Nancy P Blumenthal1,2, Michael G Petty3, Ruth McCorkle4. 1. 1 Lung Transplant Program, Penn Transplant Institute, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 2. 2 Doctorate of Nursing Practice Program, Yale University, West Haven, CT, USA. 3. 3 Department of Nursing, University of Minnesota Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN, USA. 4. 4 Division of Acute Care/Health Systems, Yale University School of Nursing, West Haven, CT, USA.
Abstract
The goal of consistent, predictable, and improved outcomes has continued to elude the scientific community in the 30 years since lung transplantation became the procedure of choice for patients with terminal, nonmalignant lung disease. BACKGROUND: Although there is consensus regarding disease-specific indications for lung transplant, ambiguity remains regarding how patient-specific attributes should influence lung transplant candidacy. This study had 3 aims (1) to establish the missing domains of the interdisciplinary assessment of the lung transplant candidate, (2) to have these domains validated by an international panel of lung transplant experts, and (3) to recommend the next step for inclusion of these domains into the lung transplant candidate selection process. METHODS: Three levels of evidence were reviewed. A search for standards and guidelines, a comprehensive literature review, and a validation of domains by experts were conducted. RESULTS: Seven domains of patient attributes were identified as relevant to lung transplant patient selection: cognitive performance, frailty, psychological factors, self-efficacy, social support, quality of life, and sociodemographic factors. Within each domain, several elements were identified to be incorporated in the process of patient assessment. CONCLUSION: Assessment of the missing domains and elements should be incorporated into the interdisciplinary lung transplant evaluation process. Standardized recognition and reporting of the patient-specific attributes will inform the work of individual transplant programs and the international transplant community. Further study is needed to associate these patient attributes with transplant outcomes. Improved understanding is needed regarding how nurses assess lung transplant candidates and how they communicate their findings within interdisciplinary settings.
The goal of consistent, predictable, and improved outcomes has continued to elude the scientific community in the 30 years since lung transplantation became the procedure of choice for patients with terminal, nonmalignant lung disease. BACKGROUND: Although there is consensus regarding disease-specific indications for lung transplant, ambiguity remains regarding how patient-specific attributes should influence lung transplant candidacy. This study had 3 aims (1) to establish the missing domains of the interdisciplinary assessment of the lung transplant candidate, (2) to have these domains validated by an international panel of lung transplant experts, and (3) to recommend the next step for inclusion of these domains into the lung transplant candidate selection process. METHODS: Three levels of evidence were reviewed. A search for standards and guidelines, a comprehensive literature review, and a validation of domains by experts were conducted. RESULTS: Seven domains of patient attributes were identified as relevant to lung transplant patient selection: cognitive performance, frailty, psychological factors, self-efficacy, social support, quality of life, and sociodemographic factors. Within each domain, several elements were identified to be incorporated in the process of patient assessment. CONCLUSION: Assessment of the missing domains and elements should be incorporated into the interdisciplinary lung transplant evaluation process. Standardized recognition and reporting of the patient-specific attributes will inform the work of individual transplant programs and the international transplant community. Further study is needed to associate these patient attributes with transplant outcomes. Improved understanding is needed regarding how nurses assess lung transplant candidates and how they communicate their findings within interdisciplinary settings.
Authors: Justin P Rosenheck; David J Ross; Mena Botros; Alexander Wong; Jonathan Sternberg; Yen-An Chen; Nathan Liang; Amy Baer; Ebad Ahmed; Ryan Swenerton; Bernhard G Zimmermann; Gordon Fehringer; Zachary P Demko; Michael Olymbios; Paul R Billings; Brian C Keller Journal: Transplant Direct Date: 2022-03-25