Literature DB >> 27888084

Are Locked Facets a Contraindication for Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion?

Rodrigo Navarro-Ramirez1, Gernot Lang2, Yu Moriguchi1, Eric Elowitz1, Jose Alfredo Corredor1, Mauricio J Avila1, Alberto Gotfryd1, Marjan Alimi1, Lena Gandevia1, Roger Härtl3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Extreme lateral interbody fusion (ELIF) has gained popularity as a minimally invasive treatment allowing for indirect decompression of neural elements. However, evidence regarding the influence of facet degeneration (FD) and facet tropism (FT) toward indirect decompression is lacking. The aim of the study was to evaluate whether indirect decompression is impaired by FD and FT in patients undergoing ELIF.
METHODS: Thirty-seven patients undergoing ELIF were included in a retrospective study. Radiographic parameters including disk height, segmental disk angle, foraminal area, FD, FT, and clinical outcome parameters (Oswestry Disability Index and Visual Analog Scale) were measured preoperatively and postoperatively. FD and FT were correlated with radiographic and clinical outcome parameters in order to determine predictors restricting indirect decompression.
RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients with a total of 74 levels were analyzed. Clinical and radiographic outcome measures including central canal area (Δ = +17.2 mm2), mean disk height (Δ = +3 mm), and foraminal area (Δ = +9.9 mm2) revealed significant improvement compared with before surgery (P ≤ 0.05). Patients with severe FD (grade 4) were more likely to have FT ≥ 12 degrees (32.3%) than patients without/mild (grades 0 and 1; 10%) or moderate FD (grades 2 and 3; 13%), P ≤ 0.05. FD and FT did not affect disk height restoration, foraminal area, canal surface area, or clinical outcome measures (P ≥ 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Indirect decompression of neural elements in ELIF is not impaired by FD and FT are not relative contraindications in patients undergoing ELIF.
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Degenerative; Facet degeneration; Facet tropism; Minimally invasive; Neural decompression; XLIF

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27888084     DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.11.059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World Neurosurg        ISSN: 1878-8750            Impact factor:   2.104


  10 in total

Review 1.  Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: What Is the Evidence of Indirect Neural Decompression? A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Matteo Formica; Emanuele Quarto; Andrea Zanirato; Lorenzo Mosconi; Davide Vallerga; Irene Zotta; Maddalena Lontaro Baracchini; Carlo Formica; Lamberto Felli
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2020-03-20

2.  Indirect Decompression Failure After Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion-Reported Failures and Predictive Factors: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Sertac Kirnaz; Rodrigo Navarro-Ramirez; Jiaao Gu; Christoph Wipplinger; Ibrahim Hussain; Joshua Adjei; Eliana Kim; Franziska Anna Schmidt; Taylor Wong; Robert Nick Hernandez; Roger Härtl
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-05-28

3.  Dynamic Posture-Related Preoperative Pain as a Single Clinical Criterion in Patient Selection for Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion Without Direct Decompression.

Authors:  Kai-Zheong Lim; Christopher Daly; Jessica Brown; Tony Goldschlager
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2018-11-15

4.  Radiographic and clinical outcome of lateral lumbar interbody fusion for extreme lumbar spinal stenosis of Schizas grade D: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Jun Li; Hao Li; Ning Zhang; Zhi-Wei Wang; Teng-Fei Zhao; Lin-Wei Chen; Gang Chen; Qi-Xin Chen; Fang-Cai Li
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (LLIF): An Update.

Authors:  Oded Rabau; Rodrigo Navarro-Ramirez; Mina Aziz; Alisson Teles; Susan Mengxiao Ge; Javier Quillo-Olvera; Jean Ouellet
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-05-28

6.  Analysis of Temporal Changes in Dural Sac Morphology After XLIF Indirect Decompression.

Authors:  Yutaka Kono; Hogaku Gen; Yoshio Sakuma
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-08-07

7.  Effects of preoperative sagittal spinal imbalance on pain after lateral lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Akihiko Hiyama; Hiroyuki Katoh; Daisuke Sakai; Masato Sato; Masahiko Watanabe
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Predictors for second-stage posterior direct decompression after lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a review of five hundred fifty-seven patients in the past five years.

Authors:  Jun Li; Tian-Zhen Xu; Ning Zhang; Qi-Xin Chen; Fang-Cai Li
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 3.479

9.  Which factor can predict the effect of indirect decompression using oblique lumbar interbody fusion?

Authors:  Joon-Bum Woo; Dong-Wuk Son; Su-Hun Lee; Jun-Seok Lee; Sang Weon Lee; Geun Sung Song
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 1.817

10.  Indirect decompression via oblique lumbar interbody fusion is sufficient for treatment of lumbar foraminal stenosis.

Authors:  Sheng-Chieh Tseng; Yu-Hsien Lin; Yun-Che Wu; Cheng-Min Shih; Kun-Hui Chen; Cheng-Hung Lee; Chien-Chou Pan
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-08-18
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.