Meike Adam1, Pierre Tennstedt2, Dominik Lanwehr2, Derya Tilki3, Thomas Steuber2, Burkhard Beyer2, Imke Thederan2, Hans Heinzer2, Alexander Haese2, Georg Salomon2, Lars Budäus2, Uwe Michl2, Dirk Pehrke2, Pär Stattin4, Jürgen Bernard5, Bernd Klaus6, Raisa S Pompe2, Cordula Petersen6, Hartwig Huland2, Markus Graefen2, Rudolf Schwarz6, Wolfgang Huber7, Stacy Loeb8, Thorsten Schlomm9. 1. Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany. 2. Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. 3. Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. 4. Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; Surgery and Perioperative Sciences, Urology and Andrology, Umeå University Hospital, Umeå, Sweden. 5. Fraunhofer-Institut für Grafische Datenverarbeitung, Darmstadt, Germany. 6. Department for Radiooncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. 7. Genome Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany. 8. Department of Urology, Population Health and Laura & Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University, NY, USA. 9. Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. Electronic address: tschlomm@uke.de.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: While the optimal use and timing of secondary therapy after radical prostatectomy (RP) remain controversial, there are limited data on patient-reported outcomes following multimodal therapy. OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of additional radiation therapy (RT) and/or androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) on urinary continence, potency, and quality of life (QoL) after RP. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Among 13150 men who underwent RP from 1992 to 2013, 905 received RP + RT, 407 RP + ADT and 688 RP + RT + ADT. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSES: Urinary function, sexual function, and overall QoL were evaluated annually using self-administered validated questionnaires. Propensity score-matched and bootstrap analyses were performed, and the distributions for all functional outcomes were analyzed as a function of time after RP. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Patients who received RP + RT had a 4% higher overall incontinence rate 3 yr after surgery, and 1% higher rate for severe incontinence (>3 pads/24h) compared to matched RP-only patients. ADT further increased the overall and severe incontinence rates by 4% and 3%, respectively, compared to matched RP + RT patients. RP + RT was associated with an 18% lower rate of potency compared to RP alone, while RP + RT + ADT was associated with a further 17% reduction compared to RP + RT. Additional RT reduced QoL by 10% and additional ADT by a further 12% compared to RP only and RP + RT, respectively. The timing of RT after RP had no influence on continence, but adjuvant compared to salvage RT was associated with significantly lower potency (37% vs 45%), but higher QoL (60% vs 56%). Limitations of our study include the observational study design and potential for selection bias in the treatments received. CONCLUSIONS: Secondary RT and ADT after RP have an additive negative influence on urinary function, potency, and QoL. Patients with high-risk disease should be counseled before RP on the potential net impairment of functional outcomes due to multimodal treatment. PATIENT SUMMARY: Men with high-risk disease choosing surgery upfront should be counseled on the potential need for additional radiation and or androgen deprivation, and the potential net impairment of functional outcomes arising from multimodal treatment.
BACKGROUND: While the optimal use and timing of secondary therapy after radical prostatectomy (RP) remain controversial, there are limited data on patient-reported outcomes following multimodal therapy. OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of additional radiation therapy (RT) and/or androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) on urinary continence, potency, and quality of life (QoL) after RP. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Among 13150 men who underwent RP from 1992 to 2013, 905 received RP + RT, 407 RP + ADT and 688 RP + RT + ADT. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSES: Urinary function, sexual function, and overall QoL were evaluated annually using self-administered validated questionnaires. Propensity score-matched and bootstrap analyses were performed, and the distributions for all functional outcomes were analyzed as a function of time after RP. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Patients who received RP + RT had a 4% higher overall incontinence rate 3 yr after surgery, and 1% higher rate for severe incontinence (>3 pads/24h) compared to matched RP-only patients. ADT further increased the overall and severe incontinence rates by 4% and 3%, respectively, compared to matched RP + RT patients. RP + RT was associated with an 18% lower rate of potency compared to RP alone, while RP + RT + ADT was associated with a further 17% reduction compared to RP + RT. Additional RT reduced QoL by 10% and additional ADT by a further 12% compared to RP only and RP + RT, respectively. The timing of RT after RP had no influence on continence, but adjuvant compared to salvage RT was associated with significantly lower potency (37% vs 45%), but higher QoL (60% vs 56%). Limitations of our study include the observational study design and potential for selection bias in the treatments received. CONCLUSIONS: Secondary RT and ADT after RP have an additive negative influence on urinary function, potency, and QoL. Patients with high-risk disease should be counseled before RP on the potential net impairment of functional outcomes due to multimodal treatment. PATIENT SUMMARY:Men with high-risk disease choosing surgery upfront should be counseled on the potential need for additional radiation and or androgen deprivation, and the potential net impairment of functional outcomes arising from multimodal treatment.
Authors: Derya Tilki; Valentin Maurer; Raisa S Pompe; Felix K Chun; Felix Preisser; Alexander Haese; Markus Graefen; Hartwig Huland; Philipp Mandel Journal: World J Urol Date: 2019-04-02 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: G Corona; S Filippi; P Comelio; N Bianchi; F Frizza; M Dicuio; G Rastrelli; S Concetti; A Sforza; L Vignozzi; M Maggi Journal: Int J Impot Res Date: 2021-03-21 Impact factor: 2.896
Authors: Heather L Huelster; Aaron A Laviana; Daniel D Joyce; Li-Ching Huang; Zhiguo Zhao; Tatsuki Koyama; Karen E Hoffman; Ralph Conwill; Michael Goodman; Ann S Hamilton; Xiao-Cheng Wu; Lisa E Paddock; Antoinette Stroup; Matthew Cooperberg; Mia Hashibe; Brock B O'Neil; Sherrie H Kaplan; Sheldon Greenfield; David F Penson; Daniel A Barocas Journal: Urol Oncol Date: 2020-07-29 Impact factor: 3.498
Authors: J N Nyarangi-Dix; J Steimer; T Bruckner; H Jakobi; S A Koerber; B Hadaschik; J Debus; M Hohenfellner Journal: World J Urol Date: 2017-08-31 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Donald S Strassberg; Suzanne M Zavodni; Paul Gardner; Christopher Dechet; Robert A Stephenson; Kelsey K Sewell Journal: Curr Urol Date: 2017-11-30
Authors: Elena Kainz; Karin Stuff; Ursula Kahl; Christian Wiessner; Yuanyuan Yu; Franziska von Breunig; Rainer Nitzschke; Alexander Haese; Markus Graefen; Marlene Fischer Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2022-01-27 Impact factor: 3.440
Authors: Heikki Seikkula; Pieter Janssen; Manuela Tutolo; Lorenzo Tosco; Antonino Battaglia; Lisa Moris; Thomas Van den Broeck; Maarten Albersen; Gert De Meerleer; Hendrik Van Poppel; Wouter Everaerts; Steven Joniau Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2017-11-22 Impact factor: 6.244