Peter A Argenta1, Karla V Ballman2, Melissa A Geller3, Linda F Carson3, Rahel Ghebre3, Sally A Mullany3, Deanna G K Teoh3, Boris J N Winterhoff3, Colleen L Rivard3, Britt K Erickson3. 1. Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Women's Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States. Electronic address: argenta@umn.edu. 2. Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Department of Healthcare Policy and Research, Weill Cornell Medical School, New York, NY, United States. 3. Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Women's Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common side effect of cancer therapy with few efficacious treatments. METHODS: We enrolled 70 patients with CIPN in a randomized, double-blinded, sham-controlled, cross-over trial to determine if photobiomodulation (PBM)±physiotherapy reduced the symptoms of neuropathy compared to sham treatment. At the conclusion of follow-up, sham-arm patients could cross-over into a third arm combining PBM and physiotherapy to determine if multimodal treatment had additive effects. Treatment included 30minute sessions 3-times weekly for 6weeks using either PBM or sham therapy. Neuropathy was assessed using the modified total neuropathy score (mTNS) at initiation and 4, 8, and 16weeks after initiating treatment. RESULTS: Sham-treated patients experienced no significant change in mTNS scores at any point during the primary analysis. PBM patients experienced significant reduction in mTNS scores at all time points. Mean changes in mTNS score (and corresponding percent drop from baseline) for sham and PBM-group patients respectively were -0.1 (-0.7%) and -4.2 (-32.4%) at 4weeks (p<0.001), 0.2 (0.0%) and -6.8 (-52.6%) at 8weeks (p<0.001), and 0.0 (0.1%) and -5.0 (-38.8%) at 16weeks (p<0.001). Patients who crossed over into the PBM/PT-group experienced similar results to those treated primarily; changes in mTNS score from baseline were -5.5 (-40.6%) 4weeks (p<0.001), -6.9 (-50.9%) at 8weeks (p<0.001), and -4.9 (-35.9%) at 16weeks (p<0.001). The addition of physiotherapy did not improve outcomes over PBM alone. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Among patients with CIPN, PBM produced significant reduction in neuropathy symptoms.
BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common side effect of cancer therapy with few efficacious treatments. METHODS: We enrolled 70 patients with CIPN in a randomized, double-blinded, sham-controlled, cross-over trial to determine if photobiomodulation (PBM)±physiotherapy reduced the symptoms of neuropathy compared to sham treatment. At the conclusion of follow-up, sham-arm patients could cross-over into a third arm combining PBM and physiotherapy to determine if multimodal treatment had additive effects. Treatment included 30minute sessions 3-times weekly for 6weeks using either PBM or sham therapy. Neuropathy was assessed using the modified total neuropathy score (mTNS) at initiation and 4, 8, and 16weeks after initiating treatment. RESULTS: Sham-treated patients experienced no significant change in mTNS scores at any point during the primary analysis. PBM patients experienced significant reduction in mTNS scores at all time points. Mean changes in mTNS score (and corresponding percent drop from baseline) for sham and PBM-group patients respectively were -0.1 (-0.7%) and -4.2 (-32.4%) at 4weeks (p<0.001), 0.2 (0.0%) and -6.8 (-52.6%) at 8weeks (p<0.001), and 0.0 (0.1%) and -5.0 (-38.8%) at 16weeks (p<0.001). Patients who crossed over into the PBM/PT-group experienced similar results to those treated primarily; changes in mTNS score from baseline were -5.5 (-40.6%) 4weeks (p<0.001), -6.9 (-50.9%) at 8weeks (p<0.001), and -4.9 (-35.9%) at 16weeks (p<0.001). The addition of physiotherapy did not improve outcomes over PBM alone. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Among patients with CIPN, PBM produced significant reduction in neuropathy symptoms.
Authors: Mariana de Pauli Paglioni; Carolina Guimarães Bonfim Alves; Elisa Kauark Fontes; Marcio Ajudarte Lopes; Ana Carolina Prado Ribeiro; Thaís Bianca Brandão; Cesar Augusto Migliorati; Alan Roger Santos-Silva Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2019-07-01 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Marwan El Mobadder; Fadi Farhat; Wassim El Mobadder; Samir Nammour Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-11-15 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Jolien Robijns; Raj G Nair; Joy Lodewijckx; Praveen Arany; Andrei Barasch; Jan M Bjordal; Paolo Bossi; Anne Chilles; Patricia M Corby; Joel B Epstein; Sharon Elad; Reza Fekrazad; Eduardo Rodrigues Fregnani; Marie-Thérèse Genot; Ana M C Ibarra; Michael R Hamblin; Vladimir Heiskanen; Ken Hu; Jean Klastersky; Rajesh Lalla; Sofia Latifian; Arun Maiya; Jeroen Mebis; Cesar A Migliorati; Dan M J Milstein; Barbara Murphy; Judith E Raber-Durlacher; Hendrik J Roseboom; Stephen Sonis; Nathaniel Treister; Yehuda Zadik; René-Jean Bensadoun Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2022-08-30 Impact factor: 5.738