Literature DB >> 27887718

Novel centrifugal technology for measuring sperm concentration in the home.

Ulrich Y Schaff1, Laura L Fredriksen1, Jon G Epperson1, Tiffany R Quebral1, Sara Naab1, Mark J Sarno2, Michael L Eisenberg3, Greg J Sommer4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the analytical performance and usability of the Trak Male Fertility Testing System, a semiquantitative (categorical) device recently US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-cleared for measuring sperm concentration in the home by untrained users.
DESIGN: A three-site clinical trial comparing self-reported lay user results versus reference results obtained by computer-aided semen analysis (CASA).
SETTING: Simulated home use environments at fertility centers and urologist offices. PATIENT(S): A total of 239 untrained users. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Sperm concentration results reported from self-testing lay users and laboratory reference method by CASA were evaluated semiquantitatively against the device's clinical cutoffs of 15 M/mL (current World Health Organization cutoff) and 55 M/mL (associated with faster time to pregnancy). Additional reported metrics include assay linearity, precision, limit of detection, and ease-of-use ratings from lay users. RESULT(S): Lay users achieved an accuracy (versus the reference) of 93.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 84.1%-97.4%) for results categorized as ≤15 M/mL, 82.4% (95% CI 73.3%-88.9%) for results categorized as 15-55 M/mL, and 95.5% (95% CI 88.9%-98.2%) for results categorized as >55 M/mL. When measured quantitatively, Trak results had a strong linear correlation with CASA measurements (r = 0.99). The precision and limit of detection studies show that the device has adequate reproducibility and detection range for home use. Subjects generally rated the device as easy to use. CONCLUSION(S): The Trak System is an accurate tool for semiquantitatively measuring sperm concentration in the home. The system may enable screening and longitudinal assessment of sperm concentration at home. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02475395.
Copyright © 2016 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Sperm count; cytometry; home test; male fertility; semen analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27887718     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.10.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  9 in total

1.  On-chip oocyte denudation from cumulus-oocyte complexes for assisted reproductive therapy.

Authors:  Lindong Weng; Gloria Y Lee; Jie Liu; Ravi Kapur; Thomas L Toth; Mehmet Toner
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 6.799

2.  An automated smartphone-based diagnostic assay for point-of-care semen analysis.

Authors:  Manoj Kumar Kanakasabapathy; Magesh Sadasivam; Anupriya Singh; Collin Preston; Prudhvi Thirumalaraju; Maanasa Venkataraman; Charles L Bormann; Mohamed Shehata Draz; John C Petrozza; Hadi Shafiee
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 17.956

3.  At-home sperm testing for epidemiologic studies: Evaluation of the Trak male fertility testing system in an internet-based preconception cohort.

Authors:  Greg J Sommer; Tanran R Wang; Jon G Epperson; Elizabeth E Hatch; Amelia K Wesselink; Kenneth J Rothman; Laura L Fredriksen; Ulrich Y Schaff; Barry Behr; Michael L Eisenberg; Lauren A Wise
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2019-12-15       Impact factor: 3.980

4.  A North American prospective study of depression, psychotropic medication use, and semen quality.

Authors:  Jennifer J Yland; Michael L Eisenberg; Elizabeth E Hatch; Kenneth J Rothman; Craig J McKinnon; Yael I Nillni; Greg J Sommer; Tanran R Wang; Lauren A Wise
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 7.490

5.  Simplified sperm testing devices: a possible tool to overcome lack of accessibility and inconsistency in male factor infertility diagnosis. An opportunity for low- and middle- income countries.

Authors:  J Onofre; L Geenen; A Cox; I Van Der Auwera; F Willendrup; E Andersen; R Campo; N Dhont; W Ombelet
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2021-03-31

Review 6.  A Novel Approach to Improving the Reliability of Manual Semen Analysis: A Paradigm Shift in the Workup of Infertile Men.

Authors:  Christopher Douglas; Neel Parekh; Linda G Kahn; Ralf Henkel; Ashok Agarwal
Journal:  World J Mens Health       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 5.400

7.  Male cellular telephone exposure, fecundability, and semen quality: results from two preconception cohort studies.

Authors:  E E Hatch; S K Willis; A K Wesselink; E M Mikkelsen; M L Eisenberg; G J Sommer; H T Sorensen; K J Rothman; L A Wise
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  Validation of a smartphone-based, computer-assisted sperm analysis system compared with laboratory-based manual microscopic semen analysis and computer-assisted semen analysis.

Authors:  Won Hee Cheon; Hyun Jun Park; Min Jung Park; Mi Young Lim; Jih Hoon Park; Byeong Jin Kang; Nam Cheol Park
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2019-08-06

9.  Web- and Artificial Intelligence-Based Image Recognition For Sperm Motility Analysis: Verification Study.

Authors:  Vincent Fs Tsai; Bin Zhuang; Yuan-Hung Pong; Ju-Ton Hsieh; Hong-Chiang Chang
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2020-11-19
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.