| Literature DB >> 27887584 |
Cheng Qian1, Fei Tan2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Vascular cognitive impairment (VCI), compared to vascular dementia (VD), has a broader definition and highlights the effect of vascular disease in dementia, and stroke seems play an important role in the development of VCI. However, not all patients with brain infarcts suffer from VCI; unique risk factors appear to cause such progression. This study aimed to find potential risk factors of vascular cognitive impairment among patients with brain infarcts.Entities:
Keywords: Low density lipoprotein; MMSE; Stroke; Vascular cognitive impairment; Vascular dementia; apoprotein B
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27887584 PMCID: PMC5123286 DOI: 10.1186/s12883-016-0766-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Neurol ISSN: 1471-2377 Impact factor: 2.474
Comparison of demographic and clinical characteristics of the two study groups
| Dementia | Infarction |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number | 37 | 74 | |
| Age | 70.62 ± 9.95 | 70.82 ± 12.04 | 0.93 |
| Sex | F: 37.84% | F: 45.95% | 0.421 |
| M: 62.16% | M: 54.05% | ||
| Smoke (%) | 16.22 | 27.03 | 0.208 |
| Hypertension (%) | 72.97 | 71.62 | 0.882 |
| Hyperlipidemia (%) | 35.14 | 59.46 | 0.015 |
| DM (%) | 27.03 | 25.68 | 0.88 |
| VitB12 deficiency (%) | 32.43 | 18.92 | 0.115 |
| Folic acid deficiency (%) | 13.51 | 5.41 | 0.143 |
| Foci of malacia (%) | 29.73 | 20.27 | 0.271 |
| Encephalatrophy (%) | 81.08 | 66.22 | 0.105 |
| Leukoaraiosis (%) | 75.68 | 66.22 | 0.312 |
Variables in the equation
| B | S.E. | Wald | df | Sig. | Exp(B) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| lipid | −0.996 | 0.418 | 5.681 | 1 | 0.017 | 0.369 |
| Constant | −0.223 | 0.274 | 0.664 | 1 | 0.415 | 0.8 |
Subtypes of lipids in two groups
| Dementia | Infarction |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| CHOL (mmol/l) | 4.30 ± 0.86 | 4.82 ± 0.90 | 0.004 |
| TG (mmol/l) | 1.22 ± 0.51 | 1.55 ± 1.07 | 0.032 |
| HDL (mmol/l) | 1.11 ± 0.4 | 1.13 ± 0.25 | 0.770 |
| LDL (mg/dl) | 1.08 ± 0.31 | 1.26 ± 0.35 | 0.006 |
| apoA-I (mg/dl) | 1.13 ± 0.19 | 1.23 ± 0.27 | 0.039 |
| apoB (mg/dl) | 0.91 ± 0.22 | 1.05 ± 0.27 | 0.005 |
Variables in the equation
| B | S.E. | Wald | df | Sig. | Exp(B) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TG | −0.634 | 0.402 | 2.489 | 1 | 0.115 | 0.530 |
| Chol | 0.511 | 0.825 | 0.384 | 1 | 0.536 | 1.667 |
| LDL | −1.944 | 2.172 | 0.801 | 1 | 0.371 | 0.143 |
| ApoA-I | −2.171 | 1.078 | 4.057 | 1 | 0.044 | 0.114 |
| ApoB | −1.004 | 2.411 | 0.173 | 1 | 0.677 | 0.366 |
| Constant | 3.639 | 1.575 | 5.335 | 1 | 0.021 | 38.052 |
Fig. 1Scatter diagram of the ratio apoB/LDL ratio and MMSE score
Correlations
| MMSE | apoB/LDL | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| MMSE | Pearson Correlation | 1 | 0.411a |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.011 | ||
| N | 37 | 37 | |
| apoB/LDL | Pearson Correlation | 0.411a | 1 |
| Sig. (2-tailed) | 0.011 | ||
| N | 37 | 37 | |
aCorrelation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed)
Model summaryb
| Model | R | R Square | Adjusted R square | Std. error of the estimate | Durbin-Watson |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.411a | .169 | 0.146 | 3.88304 | 0.451 |
aPredictors: (Constant), apoB/LDL
bDependent Variable: MMSE