| Literature DB >> 27886274 |
Chandan Biswas1,2,3, Yonghwan Kim1,2, Young Hee Lee1,2.
Abstract
Silicon based metal-semiconductor-metal (MSM) photodetectors have faster photogeneration and carrier collection across the metal-semiconductor Schottky contacts, and CMOS integratibility compared to conventional p-n junction photodetectors. However, its operations are limited by low photogeneration, inefficient carrier-separation, and low mobility. Here, we show a simple and highly effective approach for boosting Si MSM photodetector efficiency by uniformly decorating semiconducting CdSe quantum dots on Si channel (Si-QD). Significantly higher photocurrent on/off ratio was achieved up to over 500 compared to conventional Si MSM photodetector (on/off ratio ~5) by increasing photogeneration and improving carrier separation. Furthermore, a substrate-biasing technique invoked wide range of tunable photocurrent on/off ratio in Si-QD photodetector (ranging from 2.7 to 562) by applying suitable combinations of source-drain and substrate biasing conditions. Strong photogeneration and carrier separation were achieved by employing Stark effect into the Si-QD hybrid system. These results highlight a promising method for enhancing Si MSM photodetector efficiency more than 100 times and simultaneously compatible with current silicon technologies.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27886274 PMCID: PMC5122951 DOI: 10.1038/srep37857
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1(a) Schematic model of CdSe decorated Si MSM device consists of source (S) and drain (D) Cr/Au (5 nm/50 nm) metal electrodes. (b) SEM micrograph of Si MSM device without QDs. Si devices were fabricated with 10 μm channel length and various different channel widths (not shown in the figure). (c) Photoluminescence intensity plot (at 497 nm) of the QD decorated Si MSM device with a 355 nm diode-pumped solid state (DPSS) laser excitation. (d) Absorbance (QD dispersed in toluene solution) and PL (QD deposited on Si substrate) spectrum of CdSe QDs. (e) PL peak shift under different substrate bias.
Figure 2(a,b) IDS current mapping plot of Si device without QDs using different source-drain bias (VDS) and substrate biasing conditions under dark (a) and in light (b). (c,d) IDS color mapping plots of Si-QD device with identical VDS and substrate biasing conditions under dark (c) and in light (d) conditions. Dashed lines showed high current region in (d).
Figure 3(a,b) Device conductance (in dark) and photoconductance (under light) comparisons for the devices with QDs (a) and without QDs (b) under different VDS biasing conditions. (c) Photocurrent on-off ratio (ratio between the dark current and current under light) for the Si and Si-QD devices without substrate bias as the light was turned on & off. (d) Photocurrent on/off ratio for the Si and Si-QD devices with a fixed source-drain and substrate bias (+2 V).
Figure 4(a) Schematic representation of Si-QD device decorated with electric field induced photoactive QDs regions (shown in violet circular area) in source-drain channel. Inset represents the schematic model of photocarrier generation and separation. (b) Variation in photocurrent on/off ratio of Si and Si-QD device against variable applied VDS without substrate biasing (Vsub). (c) Schematic model of the Si and Si-QD band alignments under illumination. (d) Variation in photocurrent on/off ratio of Si and Si-QD device with variable applied Vsub at the same VDS potential (2 V) with different polarities.