| Literature DB >> 27886267 |
Jing-Hui Zhang1,2, Aping Niu2, Jing Li1, Jian-Wei Fu1, Qun Xu1, De-Sheng Pei2.
Abstract
Carbon quantum dots (Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27886267 PMCID: PMC5122948 DOI: 10.1038/srep37860
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Characterization of CDs by using Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM).
(A) TEM images; (B) HRTEM images; (C) particle size distribution of SCDs, HCDs and CCDs.
Figure 2Characterization of chemical structure of CDs.
(A) XRD patterns; (B) FT-IR (Fourier transform infrared) spectra; (C) XPS spectra of HCDs, SCDs and CCDs; (D) C1s profile of HCDs; (E) C1s profile of SCDs; (F) C1s profile of CCDs; (G) N1s profile of HCDs; (H) N1s profile of SCDs; (I) N1s profile of CCDs.
Element contents and the percentage of chemical bond of the CDs.
| sample | Element content (%) | Percentage of Chemical bond (%) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C1s | N1s | O1s | Other | C1s | N1s | |||||
| C-N | C-O/C=O | C-C | N-O | -NH2/-NH | N-C | |||||
| HCDs | 74.66% | 9.66% | 14.75% | 0.93% | 29.06% | 25.28% | 45.66% | 35.70% | 35.59% | 28.71% |
| SCDs | 82.93% | 2.43% | 13.52% | 1.12% | 5.31% | 6.75% | 87.95% | — | 16.78% | 83.22% |
| CCDs | 73.60% | 6.87% | 19.09% | 0.44% | 10.56% | 18.50% | 70.93% | 46.05% | 37.70% | 16.25% |
Figure 3The photoluminescence characterization of CDs.
(A) UV-vis absorption; (B–D) Fluorescent luminescence emission spectra of HCDs, SCDs and CCDs with progressively longer excitation wavelengths in 20 nm increments from 300 nm to 500 nm. Inset: the fluorescent images of CDs in deionized water solution under the UV light before and after the UV light on. (E–G) Normalized emission spectra of HCDs, SCDs and CCDs with the same excitation wavelengths.
Figure 4The fluorescent imaging of CDs in zebrafish and biocompatibility of CDs.
(A–D) Fluorescent microscopic images of bright field and fluorescent field (B blue, C green, and D red) of zebrafish embryos at 24 hpf after exposure to different concentrations of SCDs and HCDs. Scale bars, 1000 μm. (E,F) Effects of exposure concentration of SCDs, HCDs and CCDs on zebrafish mortality at 120 hpf and hatch rate at 72 hpf (n = 50). Single asterisk (*) indicated significant difference compared to control at P < 0.05, and double asterisks (**) indicated significant difference, compared to control at P < 0.01. Values represented the mean ± standard error (SE) of three replicates.
Figure 5The photoluminescence decay of CDs in zebrafish.
The fluorescent microscopic images of bright field and fluorescent field of zebrafish embryos after exposure to 0.4 mg/mL HCDs, SCDs and CCDs solutions for 2 days at different time points. Scale bars, 1,000 μm.
Figure 6The quenching effects of ATP, NADH and Fe3+ ions on CDs.
(A–C) The photoluminescence emission spectra of three CDs after added increasing concentrations (0–1,600 μM) of ATP, Fe3+ ions and NADH in PBS buffer. (D) Quenching efficiencies of ATP, Fe3+ ions and NADH on three CDs. I and I0 are the FL intensities of CDs at 340 nm excitation in the presence and absence of ATP, NADH and Fe3+ ions, respectively.