| Literature DB >> 27886130 |
Alicia Martinez1, Hugo Estrada2, Alejandra Molina3, Manuel Mejia4, Joaquin Perez5.
Abstract
The mechanisms to communicate emotions have dramatically changed in the last 10 years with social networks, where users massively communicate their emotional states by using the Internet. However, people with socialization problems have difficulty expressing their emotions verbally or interpreting the environment and providing an appropriate emotional response. In this paper, a novel solution called the Emotion-Bracelet is presented that combines a hardware device and a software system. The proposed approach identifies the polarity and emotional intensity of texts published on a social network site by performing real-time processing using a web service. It also shows emotions with a LED matrix using five emoticons that represent positive, very positive, negative, very negative, and neutral states. The Emotion-Bracelet is designed to help people express their emotions in a non-intrusive way, thereby expanding the social aspect of human emotions.Entities:
Keywords: emotions; polarity; the Emotion-Bracelet
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27886130 PMCID: PMC5190963 DOI: 10.3390/s16121980
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1The modules of the SWePT method.
Figure 2Client-Server Architecture of Emotion-Bracelet.
Figure 3Application client in the mobile service client-server.
Figure 4Emoticons.
Values of emotion.
| Emotion | Value |
|---|---|
| Very Positive | 1 |
| Positive | 0.5 |
| Neutral | 0 |
| Negative | −0.5 |
| Very Negative | −1 |
Figure 5Design of the Emotion-Bracelet.
Figure 6The emotions shown in the Emotion-Bracelet.
Results with more efficient features combination.
| Combination of Features That Give the Best Results | Corpus 1500 Comments | Corpus 3100 Comments | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 Cat. | 3 Cat. | 5 Cat. | 3 Cat. | |
| Features: (b) (c) (d) (e) | 62.4% | 83.4% | 56.6% | 77.2% |
Data obtained from questionnaires.
| PARTICIPANTS | AGE | Num of Part | IMAGE 1 (VERY POSITIVE) | IMAGE 2 (POSITIVE) | IMAGE 3 (NEUTRAL) | IMAGE 4 (NEGATIVE) | IMAGE 5 (VERY NEGATIVE) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VP | % | P | % | N | % | Ng | % | VP | % | P | % | N | % | Ng | % | VP | % | P | % | N | % | Ng | % | VNg | % | N | % | Ng | % | VNg | % | N | % | Ng | % | VNg | % | |||
| WOMEN | 15–25 | 22 | 10 | 45 | 10 | 45 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 14 | 15 | 68 | 4 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 55 | 4 | 18 | 6 | 27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 19 | 86 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 27 | 16 | 73 |
| MEN | 15–25 | 26 | 7 | 27 | 15 | 58 | 4 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 19 | 14 | 54 | 7 | 27 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 58 | 5 | 19 | 6 | 23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 15 | 20 | 77 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 19 | 21 | 81 |
| WOMEN | 25–35 | 45 | 17 | 38 | 22 | 49 | 6 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 31 | 26 | 58 | 5 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 47 | 15 | 33 | 6 | 13 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 16 | 35 | 78 | 3 | 7 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 18 | 35 | 78 |
| MEN | 25–35 | 54 | 22 | 41 | 24 | 44 | 6 | 11 | 2 | 4 | 14 | 16 | 32 | 59 | 5 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 19 | 35 | 13 | 24 | 21 | 39 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 9 | 46 | 85 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 9 | 17 | 43 | 80 |
| WOMEN | 35–45 | 7 | 2 | 29 | 4 | 57 | 1 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 43 | 2 | 29 | 1 | 14 | 1 | 14 | 3 | 43 | 3 | 43 | 1 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 29 | 5 | 71 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 86 |
| MEN | 35–45 | 15 | 6 | 40 | 4 | 27 | 5 | 33 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 27 | 7 | 47 | 3 | 20 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 13 | 4 | 27 | 8 | 53 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 93 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 7 | 5 | 33 | 9 | 60 |
| WOMEN | 45 | 4 | 1 | 25 | 2 | 50 | 1 | 25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 75 | 1 | 25 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 25 | 1 | 25 | 2 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 50 | 2 | 50 |
| MEN | 45 | 10 | 2 | 20 | 6 | 60 | 1 | 10 | 1 | 10 | 3 | 30 | 5 | 50 | 2 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 20 | 2 | 20 | 5 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 90 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 9 | 90 |
Legend: VP: Very Positive; P: Positive; N: Neutral; Ng: Negative; VNg: Very Negative.
Results of the analysis of questionnaires data.
| Gender | 3 Categories | 5 Categories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P | N | Ng | VP | P | N | Ng | VNg | |
| WOMEN | 86% | 19% | 92% | 38% | 59% | 19% | 81% | 76% |
| MEN | 81% | 38% | 94% | 35% | 55% | 38% | 85% | 78% |
Legend: P: Positive; VP: Very Positive; N: Neutral; Ng: Negative; VNg: Very Negative.
Comparative results of age between woman and men on the identification of images.
| Gender | Age | P | N | Ng |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Women | 15–25 | 68% | 27% | 86% |
| Men | 15–25 | 54% | 23% | 77% |
| Women | 25–35 | 58% | 13% | 78% |
| Men | 25–35 | 59% | 39% | 85% |
| Women | 35–45 | 29% | 14% | 71% |
| Men | 35–45 | 47% | 53% | 93% |
| Women | 45+ | 75% | 50% | 100% |
| Men | 45+ | 50% | 50% | 90% |
Legend: P: Positive; N: Neutral; Ng: Negative.
Figure 7Comparative between women and men on the identification of images by their age.