Literature DB >> 2788566

Comprehensive quality assessment approach for flow cytometric immunophenotyping of human lymphocytes.

B S Edwards1, K K Altobelli, H A Nolla, D A Harper, R R Hoffman.   

Abstract

Flow cytometric immunophenotypic (IPT) evaluation has become an important adjunct to clinical patient management and epidemiological studies. This has precipitated a need for stringent quality assessment (QA) procedures to ascertain data integrity. We evaluated a QA approach to monitor all elements of the immunophenotyping process, inclusive of blood collection and processing procedures as well as of staining reagent and instrument performance. Central to our approach was preparation each day, in parallel with clinical analytes, of lymphocytes from healthy donors, selected from a 15 donor panel. IPT parameters evaluated over a 19 month period included frequencies of CD3+, CD4+, CD8+, and CD20+ lymphocytes and the ratio of CD4+ to CD8+ lymphocytes. The sensitivity for analytical error detection was reflected by median coefficients of variation of these parameters within individual panel donors, which were 4.1%, 4.5%, 3.9%, 8.2%, and 10.1%, respectively. IPT parameter values were determined each day for two of the panel donors, then averaged and standardized to obtain a quality or Q variate, which was the basis of QA. Error detection sensitivity decreased 0.6-1.7% and the number of false rejections increased 1.2-3.3% when one panel donor rather than two was used daily for QA. This study also illuminated important aspects of what constitutes the norm for longitudinal IPT parameter variation in healthy individuals including: 1) a generally low degree of temporal parameter variation within individual donors, but 2) significant differences between donors with respect to variance estimates for CD3+ and CD8+ lymphocyte frequencies and CD4+/CD8+ lymphocyte ratios, and 3) an apparent seasonal pattern of variation in CD4+ T-cell frequencies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2788566     DOI: 10.1002/cyto.990100411

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytometry        ISSN: 0196-4763


  5 in total

1.  Data quality assessment of ungated flow cytometry data in high throughput experiments.

Authors:  Nolwenn Le Meur; Anthony Rossini; Maura Gasparetto; Clay Smith; Ryan R Brinkman; Robert Gentleman
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.355

2.  Multiparametric immunophenotyping of B cells in peripheral blood of healthy adults by flow cytometry.

Authors:  H G Höffkes; G Schmidtke; M Uppenkamp; U Schmücker
Journal:  Clin Diagn Lab Immunol       Date:  1996-01

Review 3.  Flow cytometry. Principles and applications in exercise immunology.

Authors:  H Gabriel; W Kindermann
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 4.  Use of laboratory tests for immune biomarkers in environmental health studies concerned with exposure to indoor air pollutants.

Authors:  R F Vogt
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 5.  A Critical Review on the Standardization and Quality Assessment of Nonfunctional Laboratory Tests Frequently Used to Identify Inborn Errors of Immunity.

Authors:  Sandro Félix Perazzio; Patricia Palmeira; Dewton Moraes-Vasconcelos; Andréia Rangel-Santos; João Bosco de Oliveira; Luis Eduardo Coelho Andrade; Magda Carneiro-Sampaio
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 7.561

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.