Literature DB >> 27885429

Defect width: the prognostic index for vaginal repair of cesarean section diverticula.

Xingchen Zhou1, Min Yao1, Jieru Zhou1, Weilin Tan1, Husheng Wang1, Xipeng Wang2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical parameter associated with cesarean section diverticula anatomic healing via vaginal repair management.
METHODS: Observational cohort study. From Jul 2014 to Dec 2015, 143 women with CSD underwent vaginal repair surgery in Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, and 137(95.80%) were diagnosed using both transvaginal ultrasound and MRI. A total of 124 patients (86.71%) who were followed-up for more than 6 months after surgery were enrolled in this study. Excision and suture of CSD was performed through the vaginal approach. The defect sizes of the width, length, depth and TRM before or after repair were evaluated.
RESULTS: The mean preoperative duration of menstruation was 14.47 ± 3.30 days and the thickness of the remaining muscular layer was 2.65 ± 1.13 mm before surgery. The study revealed that the healing effects of CSD repair stabilized 3 months after surgery. At the median follow-up time (11.28 months), CSD disappeared after surgery in 64.52% of patients (80/124), and 60.0% of patients (48/80) reached ≤7 days of menstruation. Meanwhile, for 35.48% of patients (44/124), CSD persisted at the median follow-up after surgery, and 31.82% (14/44) of these patients reached ≤7 days of menstruation(P < 0.05). TRM at a median follow-up time after vaginal repair >7.88 mm, 92.11% (70/76) of CSD disappeared. Moreover, when preoperative CSD width ≤18.85 mm indicates that only 18.75% (12/64) of patients will present with CSD after vaginal repair, as determined by MRI (95% CI 0.515-0.737).
CONCLUSION: The defect width of the preoperative CSD was the prognostic index of CSD anatomical repair effect. When the preoperative CSD width >18.85 mm, we should pay more attention to the edge of the defect during vaginal repairing.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cesarean section diverticula; Defect width; Thickness of remaining muscular layer; Vaginal repair

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27885429     DOI: 10.1007/s00404-016-4245-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0932-0067            Impact factor:   2.344


  6 in total

1.  Hysteroscopic treatment of cesarean scar defect.

Authors:  Yingyu Dou; Da Zeng; Zi'ang Zou; Yajun Wan; Dabao Xu; Songshu Xiao
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 2.344

2.  Evaluation of uterine scar healing by transvaginal ultrasound in 607 nonpregnant women with a history of cesarean section.

Authors:  Xingchen Zhou; Tao Zhang; Huayuan Qiao; Yi Zhang; Xipeng Wang
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 2.809

3.  Niche-related outcomes after caesarean section and quality of life: a focus group study and review of literature.

Authors:  Sanne I Stegwee; Astrid Beij; Robert A de Leeuw; Lidwine B Mokkink; Lucet F van der Voet; Judith A F Huirne
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Association between the occurrence of adenomyosis and the clinical outcomes of vaginal repair of cesarean section scar defects: an observational study.

Authors:  Huihui Chen; Wenjing Wang; Husheng Wang; Xipeng Wang
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Obstetrical outcomes after vaginal repair of caesarean scar diverticula in reproductive-aged women.

Authors:  Xingchen Zhou; Xiaoqian Yang; Huihui Chen; Xuhong Fang; Xipeng Wang
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Development and internal validation of a Nomogram for preoperative prediction of surgical treatment effect on cesarean section diverticulum.

Authors:  Yizhi Wang; Qinyi Zhu; Feikai Lin; Li Xie; Jiarui Li; Xipeng Wang
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 2.809

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.