Literature DB >> 27884387

Initial results of the National Registry of Incisional Hernia.

José Antonio Pereira1, Manuel López-Cano2, Pilar Hernández-Granados3, Xavier Feliu4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to the data from the National Registry of Incisional Hernia (EVEREG) to determine the reality of the treatment of this condition in Spain.
METHODS: EVEREG is an online prospective database which has been functioning since July 2012; operations for incisional hernia are anonymously recorded.
RESULTS: Up to March 2015, 4501 hernias from 95 of the 113 participating hospitals were registered. The mean age of the patients was 62.7, and 56.5% were women, with a mean BMI of 30.2kg/m2; 29.8% presented a high surgical risk (ASA III-V). A total of 93.7% were scheduled surgeries, 88.3% open surgery and 22.2% were recurrent incisional hernias. There were 66.9% hernias after a midline laparotomy, and 81.4% of a transverse diameter of less than 10cm. A mesh was used in 96.2% of cases. Postoperative stay was 5.3 days and 29.1% presented a complication, with a mortality of 0.8%. After a median follow-up of 7.7 months a high rate of recurrence was detected (20.7% per year), especially in hernias that were operated on after a previous repair (18.1% primary vs. 30.6% recurrent; P=.004).
CONCLUSION: the EVEREG registry is a useful tool to know the current situation of incisional hernia treatment. Analysis of the data shows several points that could be improved: a low rate of follow-up and high recurrence rate. Copyright Â
© 2016 AEC. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hernia incisional; Incisional hernia; Registros; Registry; Resultados; Results

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27884387     DOI: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2016.09.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cir Esp        ISSN: 0009-739X            Impact factor:   1.653


  6 in total

1.  A systematic methodological review of reported perioperative variables, postoperative outcomes and hernia recurrence from randomised controlled trials of elective ventral hernia repair: clear definitions and standardised datasets are needed.

Authors:  Samuel G Parker; C P J Wood; J W Butterworth; R W Boulton; A A O Plumb; S Mallett; S Halligan; A C J Windsor
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  Balancing mesh-related complications and benefits in primary ventral and incisional hernia surgery. A meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

Authors:  Manuel López-Cano; Lidia A Martin-Dominguez; José Antonio Pereira; Manuel Armengol-Carrasco; Josep M García-Alamino
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Comparison of hernia registries: the CORE project.

Authors:  I Kyle-Leinhase; F Köckerling; L N Jørgensen; A Montgomery; J F Gillion; J A P Rodriguez; W Hope; F Muysoms
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-01-06       Impact factor: 4.739

4.  Incisional hernia recurrence after open elective repair: expertise in abdominal wall surgery matters.

Authors:  J A Pereira; A Bravo-Salva; B Montcusí; S Pérez-Farre; L Fresno de Prado; M López-Cano
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Assessing the Validity and Cover Rate of the National Swedish Hernia Register.

Authors:  Erik Axman; Pär Nordin; Marina Modin; Hanna de la Croix
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 4.790

6.  Kingsnorth's modified score as predictor of complications in open inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  Alejandro Bravo-Salva; Margarita Salvá Puigserver; Clara Téllez-Marqués; Marc Pérez-Guitart; Alba González-Martín; J J Sancho-Insenser; M Pera-Roman; José A Pereira-Rodríguez
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2022-08-09
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.