Bruno Vieira1,2,3, Erwin W Hans4,5, Corine van Vliet-Vroegindeweij6, Jeroen van de Kamer6, Wim van Harten6,7,8. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. b.vieira@nki.nl. 2. Center for Healthcare Operations Improvement and Research (CHOIR), University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands. b.vieira@nki.nl. 3. Department of Health Technology and Services Research, Faculty of Behavioural Management and Social Sciences, University of Twente, PO Box 217, 7500 AE, Enschede, The Netherlands. b.vieira@nki.nl. 4. Center for Healthcare Operations Improvement and Research (CHOIR), University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands. 5. Department Industrial Engineering and Business Information Systems, Faculty of Behavioural Management and Social Sciences, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands. 6. Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 7. Department of Health Technology and Services Research, Faculty of Behavioural Management and Social Sciences, University of Twente, PO Box 217, 7500 AE, Enschede, The Netherlands. 8. Rijnstate General Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The delivery of radiotherapy (RT) involves the use of rather expensive resources and multi-disciplinary staff. As the number of cancer patients receiving RT increases, timely delivery becomes increasingly difficult due to the complexities related to, among others, variable patient inflow, complex patient routing, and the joint planning of multiple resources. Operations research (OR) methods have been successfully applied to solve many logistics problems through the development of advanced analytical models for improved decision making. This paper presents the state of the art in the application of OR methods for logistics optimization in RT, at various managerial levels. METHODS: A literature search was performed in six databases covering several disciplines, from the medical to the technical field. Papers included in the review were published in peer-reviewed journals from 2000 to 2015. Data extraction includes the subject of research, the OR methods used in the study, the extent of implementation according to a six-stage model and the (potential) impact of the results in practice. RESULTS: From the 33 papers included in the review, 18 addressed problems related to patient scheduling (of which 12 focus on scheduling patients on linear accelerators), 8 focus on strategic decision making, 5 on resource capacity planning, and 2 on patient prioritization. Although calculating promising results, none of the papers reported a full implementation of the model with at least a thorough pre-post performance evaluation, indicating that, apart from possible reporting bias, implementation rates of OR models in RT are probably low. CONCLUSIONS: The literature on OR applications in RT covers a wide range of approaches from strategic capacity management to operational scheduling levels, and shows that considerable benefits in terms of both waiting times and resource utilization are likely to be achieved. Various fields can be further developed, for instance optimizing the coordination between the available capacity of different imaging devices or developing scheduling models that consider the RT chain of operations as a whole rather than the treatment machines alone.
BACKGROUND: The delivery of radiotherapy (RT) involves the use of rather expensive resources and multi-disciplinary staff. As the number of cancerpatients receiving RT increases, timely delivery becomes increasingly difficult due to the complexities related to, among others, variable patient inflow, complex patient routing, and the joint planning of multiple resources. Operations research (OR) methods have been successfully applied to solve many logistics problems through the development of advanced analytical models for improved decision making. This paper presents the state of the art in the application of OR methods for logistics optimization in RT, at various managerial levels. METHODS: A literature search was performed in six databases covering several disciplines, from the medical to the technical field. Papers included in the review were published in peer-reviewed journals from 2000 to 2015. Data extraction includes the subject of research, the OR methods used in the study, the extent of implementation according to a six-stage model and the (potential) impact of the results in practice. RESULTS: From the 33 papers included in the review, 18 addressed problems related to patient scheduling (of which 12 focus on scheduling patients on linear accelerators), 8 focus on strategic decision making, 5 on resource capacity planning, and 2 on patient prioritization. Although calculating promising results, none of the papers reported a full implementation of the model with at least a thorough pre-post performance evaluation, indicating that, apart from possible reporting bias, implementation rates of OR models in RT are probably low. CONCLUSIONS: The literature on OR applications in RT covers a wide range of approaches from strategic capacity management to operational scheduling levels, and shows that considerable benefits in terms of both waiting times and resource utilization are likely to be achieved. Various fields can be further developed, for instance optimizing the coordination between the available capacity of different imaging devices or developing scheduling models that consider the RT chain of operations as a whole rather than the treatment machines alone.
Authors: Bruno Vieira; Derya Demirtas; Jeroen B van de Kamer; Erwin W Hans; Louis-Martin Rousseau; Nadia Lahrichi; Wim H van Harten Journal: Health Care Manag Sci Date: 2020-06-27
Authors: Jesper Lindberg; Paul Holmström; Stefan Hallberg; Thomas Björk-Eriksson; Caroline E Olsson Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2021-03-08 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Jesper Lindberg; Mrugaja Gurjar; Paul Holmström; Stefan Hallberg; Thomas Björk-Eriksson; Caroline E Olsson Journal: Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol Date: 2021-10-16
Authors: Mark Hanly; Tim Churches; Oisín Fitzgerald; Ian Caterson; Chandini Raina MacIntyre; Louisa Jorm Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2022-08-19 Impact factor: 2.908
Authors: Bruno Vieira; Derya Demirtas; Jeroen B van de Kamer; Erwin W Hans; Wim van Harten Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Date: 2019-10-24 Impact factor: 2.796