| Literature DB >> 27884171 |
Hui Dong1, Sihan Yang1,2, Qiping Zhao1, Hongyu Han1, Shunhai Zhu1, Xuelong Zhu1, Cong Li1, Ziwen Wang1, Weili Xia1, Qifei Men1, Liangyu Yang2, Bing Huang3,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Silent information regulator 2 (SIR2) proteins are a family of NAD + -dependent protein deacetylases that are considered potential targets for anti-parasitic agents. In this study, we cloned and characterized SIR2A of the protozoan parasite Eimeria tenella (EtSIR2A) and investigated its protective efficacy as a DNA vaccine.Entities:
Keywords: Coccidia; Eimeria; Recombinant plasmid; Silent information regulator 2
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27884171 PMCID: PMC5123391 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-016-1871-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Fig. 1Alignment of silent information regulator 2 (SIR2) amino acid sequences from five Eimeria species. Numbers on the right refer to the last amino acid in each corresponding line. Strictly conserved and conserved residues are shaded in black and gray, respectively. The identities and query cover between the SIR2 sequence of E. tenella Shanghai strain and the other species are listed at the end. Multiple alignments were made using ClustalX [51] and shaded using Boxshade 3.21 (http://www.ch.embnet.org/software/BOX_form.html). GenBank accession numbers for the Eimeria species are as follows: E. maxima Weybridge strain SIR2: CDJ59951; E. acervulina (Ea) Houghton strain SIR2: CDI78174; E. praecox (Ep) Houghton strain SIR2: CDI74590; E. tenella (Et) Shanghai strain SIR2A: KU871068; E. tenella Houghton strain SIR2: CDJ42555; E. necatrix (En) Houghton strain SIR2: CDJ65355. Red boxes indicate the conserved catalytic domain of a canonical sirtuin. Black boxes indicate the highly conserved regions within parasitic protozoa. Asterisks indicate the perfectly conserved residues within Apicomplexa [18]
Fig. 2qPCR analysis of EtSIR2A mRNA transcript levels in different developmental stages of E. tenella. Bars not sharing the same letters indicate significantly different expression levels (P < 0.05). Abbreviations: UO, unsporulated oocysts; SO, sporulated oocysts; Spz, sporozoites; Mrz, second-generation merozoites
Fig. 3Immunoblot of native protein of EtSIR2A in different developmental stages of E. tenella. Abbreviations: UO, unsporulated oocysts; Spz, sporozoites; SO sporulated oocysts; Mrz, second-generation merozoites
Fig. 4Localization of EtSIR2A in infected DF-1 cells by indirect immunofluorescence. Details of parasites immunostained with anti-rEtSIR2A antibodies visualized with fluorescein isothiocyanate (green) and counterstained with DAPI (blue). a Sporozoites (Spz) incubated in PBS. Infected DF-1 cells were collected at different times post-infection (p.i.). b 12 h p.i., intracellular sporozoites (iSpz); c 24 h p.i., intracellular sporozoites (iSpz); d 36 h p.i., trophozoites (Tropho); e 48 h p.i., immature first-generation schizonts (iSc); f 68 h p.i., developing first-generation schizonts (dSc); g 72 h p.i., mature first-generation schizonts (mSc); h 112 h p.i., second-generation merozoites (sMz) purified from caeca. Abbreviations: N: nucleus; pRB, posterior refractile body; fMz, first generation merozoites
Protective effects of pCAGGS-EtSIR2A against experimental Eimeria tenella infection in chickens
| Group | Average body weight gain (g) | Reduced rate of weight gain (%) | Oocyst shedding per bird (107) | Oocyst decrease (%) | Lesion scores |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pCAGGS-EtSIR2A | 97.42 ± 6.56a | 23.62 | 1.93 ± 0.15b | 62.96 | 1.09 ± 0.67b |
| pCAGGS | 75.61 ± 11.79b | 40.72 | 4.02 ± 0.26c | 22.84 | 2.20 ± 0.42c |
| TE challenged | 64.93 ± 18.53b | 49.09 | 5.21 ± 0.38d | 0 | 2.30 ± 0.68c |
| TE unchallenged | 127.54 ± 15.55a | 0 | 0.0 0.00a | 100 | 0.0 0.00a |
Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Means in the same column with different letters were significantly different between treatment groups (P < 0.05)