OBJECTIVES: To describe the prevalence of rheumatoid nodules (RN) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to compare their features with those of patients without RN. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Adult RA patients (n = 952) in the Kuwait Registry for Rheumatic Diseases from February 2013 to December 2015 were evaluated for RN. Demographic and serological features and disease activity and severity were obtained from the registry. RESULTS: Of the 952 RA patients, 22 (2.3%) had RN and 930 (97.7%) did not. Age, sex, disease duration, smoking, and family history of an autoimmune rheumatic disease were similar. Obesity was more prevalent in the RN group, i.e. 11 (50%) vs. 326 (35.1%), p = 0.016. There was no difference in rheumatoid factor (RF) or anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody positivity. Patients with RN had more sicca symptoms, i.e. 8 (36.4%) vs. 152 (16.3%), p = 0.025, a higher mean score on the visual analogue scale pain (3 ± 2.9 vs. 2 ± 2.7, p < 0.001), more tender joints (6.4 ± 8.8 vs. 4.2 ± 7.2, p = 0.001), a higher patient global assessment of disease activity (3.3 ± 2.7 vs. 2.3 ± 2.7, p < 0.001), and more deformities, i.e. 3 (13.6%) vs. 74 (8%), p = 0.034. The mean health assessment questionnaire score in RN patients was 1.1 versus 0.9 in patients without RN (p = 0.08). Patients with RN had a low disease activity (means: disease activity score [DAS-28], 3.02; clinical disease activity index, 7.7; and simple disease activity index, 10.4), similar to the other group. While the rates of methotrexate treatment were comparable, biologic therapy was administered more in patients with RN (i.e. 15 [68.2%] vs. 478 [51.4%], p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In Kuwait, the prevalence of RN is low among RA patients. Patients with and without RN are similar in terms of demographics and serologic features, except for more obesity. However, patients with RN have more sicca symptoms, joint deformities, and painful and tender joints. Disease activity scores are low with more frequent biologic therapy.
OBJECTIVES: To describe the prevalence of rheumatoid nodules (RN) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to compare their features with those of patients without RN. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Adult RApatients (n = 952) in the Kuwait Registry for Rheumatic Diseases from February 2013 to December 2015 were evaluated for RN. Demographic and serological features and disease activity and severity were obtained from the registry. RESULTS: Of the 952 RApatients, 22 (2.3%) had RN and 930 (97.7%) did not. Age, sex, disease duration, smoking, and family history of an autoimmune rheumatic disease were similar. Obesity was more prevalent in the RN group, i.e. 11 (50%) vs. 326 (35.1%), p = 0.016. There was no difference in rheumatoid factor (RF) or anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody positivity. Patients with RN had more sicca symptoms, i.e. 8 (36.4%) vs. 152 (16.3%), p = 0.025, a higher mean score on the visual analogue scale pain (3 ± 2.9 vs. 2 ± 2.7, p < 0.001), more tender joints (6.4 ± 8.8 vs. 4.2 ± 7.2, p = 0.001), a higher patient global assessment of disease activity (3.3 ± 2.7 vs. 2.3 ± 2.7, p < 0.001), and more deformities, i.e. 3 (13.6%) vs. 74 (8%), p = 0.034. The mean health assessment questionnaire score in RN patients was 1.1 versus 0.9 in patients without RN (p = 0.08). Patients with RN had a low disease activity (means: disease activity score [DAS-28], 3.02; clinical disease activity index, 7.7; and simple disease activity index, 10.4), similar to the other group. While the rates of methotrexate treatment were comparable, biologic therapy was administered more in patients with RN (i.e. 15 [68.2%] vs. 478 [51.4%], p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In Kuwait, the prevalence of RN is low among RApatients. Patients with and without RN are similar in terms of demographics and serologic features, except for more obesity. However, patients with RN have more sicca symptoms, joint deformities, and painful and tender joints. Disease activity scores are low with more frequent biologic therapy.
Authors: B-M Nyhäll-Wåhlin; C Turesson; L T H Jacobsson; J-Å Nilsson; K Forslind; K Albertsson; J Rönnelid; I F Petersson Journal: Scand J Rheumatol Date: 2010-10-05 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: J S Smolen; F C Breedveld; M H Schiff; J R Kalden; P Emery; G Eberl; P L van Riel; P Tugwell Journal: Rheumatology (Oxford) Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 7.580
Authors: Daniel Aletaha; Valerie P K Nell; Tanja Stamm; Martin Uffmann; Stephan Pflugbeil; Klaus Machold; Josef S Smolen Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2005-04-07 Impact factor: 5.156
Authors: Laura Gonzalez-Lopez; Alberto Daniel Rocha-Muñoz; Manuel Ponce-Guarneros; Alejandra Flores-Chavez; Mario Salazar-Paramo; Arnulfo Nava; Ernesto German Cardona-Muñoz; Nicte Selene Fajardo-Robledo; Soraya Amali Zavaleta-Muñiz; Teresa Garcia-Cobian; Jorge Ivan Gamez-Nava Journal: J Immunol Res Date: 2014-04-07 Impact factor: 4.818
Authors: Federica Dragoni; Rossana Conti; Simone Cazzaniga; Roberta Colucci; Lisa Pisaneschi; Luigi Naldi; Silvia Moretti Journal: Med Princ Pract Date: 2017-09-12 Impact factor: 1.927