Literature DB >> 27883975

Evaluation of current practices in transcatheter aortic valve implantation: The WRITTEN (WoRldwIde TAVI ExperieNce) survey.

Enrico Cerrato1, Luis Nombela-Franco2, Tamim M Nazif3, Helene Eltchaninoff4, Lars Søndergaard5, Henrique B Ribeiro6, Marco Barbanti7, Fabian Nietlispach8, Peter De Jaegere9, Pierfrancesco Agostoni10, Ramiro Trillo11, Pilar Jimenez-Quevedo12, Fabrizio D'Ascenzo13, Olaf Wendler14, Gabriel Maluenda15, Mao Chen16, Corrado Tamburino7, Carlos Macaya12, Martin B Leon3, Josep Rodes-Cabau17.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has been adopted worldwide as the standard treatment for severe aortic stenosis in symptomatic patients at prohibitive or high surgical risk, but there are still several areas where consensus and evidence are lacking. The purpose was to obtain a global view of current practice related to TAVI with the potential to identify the main areas of consensus and divergence between centers.
METHODS: An online questionnaire was distributed in centers performing TAVI including a total of 59 questions concerning pre-procedural evaluation, procedural practices and post-procedural management.
RESULTS: The survey was completed by 250 centers (with a cumulative experience of nearly 70,000 TAVI) from 38 different countries. Heart team meetings and surgical risk scores were routinely performed in most (>95%) centers, but frailty (44%) and quality of life (28%) assessments were less frequently performed. General anesthesia remained the most frequent type of anesthesia (60% of centers), and significant variability was detected in the examinations for residual aortic regurgitation assessment during the procedure and in post-procedural ECG monitoring and temporary pacemaker implementation (from none to ≥72h post-TAVI). Dual antiplatelet therapy duration post-TAVI was highly variable (1, 3, and ≥6months in 14%, 41% and 32% of centers, respectively) and lack of consensus in antithrombotic regimen was observed in patients with atrial fibrillation requiring anticoagulation therapy (anticoagulation alone, anticoagulation+aspirin, anticoagulation+clopidogrel, and triple therapy in 28%, 37%, 26% and 4% of centers, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: The WRITTEN survey provided extensive data on current TAVI-related practice and identified important differences between centers in key aspects of pre-, intra-, and post-operative management. This highlights the urgent need for further studies and evidence-based data to guide multiple aspects of the TAVI field.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Real world assessment valvular stenosis; TAVI; TAVR; Web-based survey

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27883975     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.11.104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


  13 in total

Review 1.  Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: status update.

Authors:  Antoinette Neylon; Khalid Ahmed; Federico Mercanti; Faisal Sharif; Darren Mylotte
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 2.  Antithrombotic management after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Fiachra McHugh; Khalid Ahmed; Antoinette Neylon; Faisal Sharif; Darren Mylotte
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in nonagenarians: selectively feasible or extravagantly futile?

Authors:  Antonis S Manolis; Antonis A Manolis
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2017-09

4.  Outcomes of surgical and transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the octogenarians-surgery still the gold standard?

Authors:  Sameer A Hirji; Fernando Ramirez-Del Val; Ahmed A Kolkailah; Julius I Ejiofor; Siobhan McGurk; Ritam Chowdhury; Jiyae Lee; Pinak B Shah; Piotr S Sobieszczyk; Sary F Aranki; Marc P Pelletier; Prem S Shekar; Tsuyoshi Kaneko
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2017-09

Review 5.  Transcatheter aortic valve replacement and stroke: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Periklis A Davlouros; Virginia C Mplani; Ioanna Koniari; Grigorios Tsigkas; George Hahalis
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 3.327

Review 6.  Anticoagulation after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Current Status.

Authors:  Antonio Greco; Davide Capodanno
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2020-04-23

7.  A retrospective study of conscious sedation versus general anaesthesia in patients scheduled for transfemoral aortic valve implantation: A single center experience.

Authors:  Jochen Renner; Anna Tesdorpf; Sandra Freitag-Wolf; Helga Francksen; Rainer Petzina; Georg Lutter; Norbert Frey; Derk Frank
Journal:  Health Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-01

8.  Ten-year experience with transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement in Finland.

Authors:  Timo Mäkikallio; Maina P Jalava; Annastiina Husso; Marko Virtanen; Teemu Laakso; Tuomas Ahvenvaara; Tuomas Tauriainen; Pasi Maaranen; Eeva-Maija Kinnunen; Sebastian Dahlbacka; Jussi Jaakkola; Juhani Airaksinen; Vesa Anttila; Mikko Savontaus; Mika Laine; Tatu Juvonen; Antti Valtola; Peter Raivio; Markku Eskola; Matti Niemelä; Fausto Biancari
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 4.709

Review 9.  Cerebrovascular Events After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

Authors:  German Armijo; Luis Nombela-Franco; Gabriela Tirado-Conte
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-07-31

10.  WorldwIde SurvEy on Clinical and Anatomical Factors Driving the Choice of Transcatheter Aortic Valve pRostheses.

Authors:  Luigi Biasco; Enrico Cerrato; Gregorio Tersalvi; Giovanni Pedrazzini; Ben Wilkins; Francesco Faletra; Enrico Ferrari; Stefanos Demertzis; Gaetano Senatore; Angelo Di Leo; Ferdinando Varbella; Ole De Backer; Luis Nombela Franco
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2020-03-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.