Literature DB >> 2788357

Comparison of cross-sectional and longitudinal measurements of age-related changes in bone mineral content.

J W Davis1, P D Ross, R D Wasnich, C J Maclean, J M Vogel.   

Abstract

Age-related, postmenopausal bone loss was examined among a cohort of Japanese-American women living in Hawaii. None of the women were using estrogens or thiazides. Cross-sectional and longitudinal measurements of bone mineral content were compared at the calcaneus, the proximal radius, and the distal radius. Cross-sectional measurements were also available for the lumbar spine. The longitudinal data showed a slowing rate of bone loss with increasing age at the radius sites. By contrast, the cross-sectional data suggested constant rates of bone loss for all ages at both radius sites and the spine. The calcaneus demonstrated a complex pattern of bone loss in both cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. The loss rates among women in their fifties were greater than for those in their sixties. From the middle sixties onward calcaneal bone loss remained essentially constant. Because of the sustained bone loss, however, women in their seventies were actually losing greater percentages of their calcaneal bone mineral than they had in their sixties.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2788357     DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.5650040309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  16 in total

1.  Prospective study of radial bone mineral density in a geographically defined population of postmenopausal Caucasian women.

Authors:  M Sowers; K Clark; R Wallace; M Jannausch; J Lemke
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 4.333

2.  On genetic studies of bone loss.

Authors:  Fang Yang; Hui Shen; Hui Jiang; Hong-Wen Deng
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  Longitudinal changes in ultrasound parameters of the calcaneus.

Authors:  P L van Daele; H Burger; C E De Laet; A Hofman; D E Grobbee; J C Birkenhäger; H A Pols
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Reconsideration of the relevance of mild wedge or short vertebral height deformities across a broad age distribution.

Authors:  W Yu; Q Lin; X Zhou; H Shao; P Sun
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  Fast and slow bone losers. Relevance to the management of osteoporosis.

Authors:  S Hough
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.923

6.  Effects of age and menopause on bone density of entire skeleton in healthy and osteoporotic women.

Authors:  R Nuti; G Martini
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 7.  Risk factors for bone loss in healthy postmenopausal women.

Authors:  B Dawson-Hughes; E A Krall; S Harris
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 8.  Bone loss in the elderly.

Authors:  J A Kanis; S Adami
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Body size, estrogen use and thiazide diuretic use affect 5-year radial bone loss in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  M R Sowers; M K Clark; M L Jannausch; R B Wallace
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  The predictive value of bone loss for fragility fractures in women: a longitudinal study over 15 years.

Authors:  P Gärdsell; O Johnell; B E Nilsson
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 4.333

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.