Sofia Laforest1,2,3, Andréanne Michaud4, Gaétan Paris5, Mélissa Pelletier1,3, Hubert Vidal6, Alain Géloën6, André Tchernof1,2,3. 1. Departement of Endocrinology and Nephrology, CHU de Quebec-Laval University, Quebec City, Canada. 2. School of Nutrition, Laval University, Quebec City, Canada. 3. Quebec Heart & Lung Institute, Quebec City, Canada. 4. Departement of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Canada. 5. Gynecology Unit, Laval University Medical Center, Quebec City, Canada. 6. Department of Physiology, University of Lyon, CARMEN INSERM U1060, INSA-Lyon, Villeurbanne, France.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether adipocyte diameters from three measurement methods are similarly associated with adiposity measurements and cardiometabolic variables. METHODS: Surgical samples of omental and abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue were obtained in a sample of 60 women (age 35-59 years; body mass index 20.3-41.1 kg/m2 ). Median adipocyte diameter of the main cell population was determined by collagenase digestion, osmium tetroxide fixation, and histological analysis. Adiposity and cardiometabolic risk factors were assessed. RESULTS: Adipocyte diameter was consistently smaller with formalin fixation than with collagenase digestion, whereas osmium-fixed cells were larger (P < 0.0001, for all). Median adipocyte diameters derived from all methods were intercorrelated (r = 0.46-0.83, P < 0.001 for all). Positive associations were found between adipocyte diameters from all techniques and regional or total adiposity measurements (P < 0.01 for all). Omental adipocyte diameter was positively associated with fasting glucose, insulin, and homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (r = 0.30-0.52, P < 0.05 for all), with osmium-fixed cell size as a stronger correlate. Osmium-fixed cell diameter was also a better correlate of plasma adiponectin and leptin. CONCLUSIONS: Although measurement techniques generated systematic differences in adipocyte size, associations with adiposity were only slightly affected by the technique. Osmium fixation generated stronger associations with cardiometabolic risk factors than collagenase digestion and histological analysis.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether adipocyte diameters from three measurement methods are similarly associated with adiposity measurements and cardiometabolic variables. METHODS: Surgical samples of omental and abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue were obtained in a sample of 60 women (age 35-59 years; body mass index 20.3-41.1 kg/m2 ). Median adipocyte diameter of the main cell population was determined by collagenase digestion, osmium tetroxide fixation, and histological analysis. Adiposity and cardiometabolic risk factors were assessed. RESULTS: Adipocyte diameter was consistently smaller with formalin fixation than with collagenase digestion, whereas osmium-fixed cells were larger (P < 0.0001, for all). Median adipocyte diameters derived from all methods were intercorrelated (r = 0.46-0.83, P < 0.001 for all). Positive associations were found between adipocyte diameters from all techniques and regional or total adiposity measurements (P < 0.01 for all). Omental adipocyte diameter was positively associated with fasting glucose, insulin, and homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (r = 0.30-0.52, P < 0.05 for all), with osmium-fixed cell size as a stronger correlate. Osmium-fixed cell diameter was also a better correlate of plasma adiponectin and leptin. CONCLUSIONS: Although measurement techniques generated systematic differences in adipocyte size, associations with adiposity were only slightly affected by the technique. Osmium fixation generated stronger associations with cardiometabolic risk factors than collagenase digestion and histological analysis.
Authors: A Michaud; J Tordjman; M Pelletier; Y Liu; S Laforest; S Noël; G Le Naour; C Bouchard; K Clément; A Tchernof Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) Date: 2016-10-04 Impact factor: 5.095
Authors: Giada Ostinelli; Sofia Laforest; Scott G Denham; Marie-Frederique Gauthier; Virginie Drolet-Labelle; Emma Scott; Frédéric-Simon Hould; Simon Marceau; Natalie Z M Homer; Catherine Bégin; Ruth Andrew; André Tchernof Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2022-07-14 Impact factor: 6.134
Authors: Han-Chow E Koh; Stephan van Vliet; Terri A Pietka; Gretchen A Meyer; Babak Razani; Richard Laforest; Robert J Gropler; Bettina Mittendorfer Journal: Diabetes Date: 2021-07-15 Impact factor: 9.337
Authors: Camila E Orsso; Eloisa Colin-Ramirez; Catherine J Field; Karen L Madsen; Carla M Prado; Andrea M Haqq Journal: Nutrients Date: 2020-09-08 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Craig A Glastonbury; Sara L Pulit; Julius Honecker; Jenny C Censin; Samantha Laber; Hanieh Yaghootkar; Nilufer Rahmioglu; Emilie Pastel; Katerina Kos; Andrew Pitt; Michelle Hudson; Christoffer Nellåker; Nicola L Beer; Hans Hauner; Christian M Becker; Krina T Zondervan; Timothy M Frayling; Melina Claussnitzer; Cecilia M Lindgren Journal: PLoS Comput Biol Date: 2020-08-14 Impact factor: 4.475