Literature DB >> 27883240

Diagnosing occupational asthma.

O Vandenplas1, H Suojalehto2, P Cullinan3.   

Abstract

Making an accurate diagnosis of occupational asthma (OA) is, generally, important. The condition has not only significant health consequences for affected workers, but also substantial socio-economic impacts for workers, their employers and wider society. Missing a diagnosis of OA may lead to continued exposure to a causative agent and progressive worsening of disease; conversely, diagnosing OA when it is not present may lead to inappropriate removal from exposure and unnecessary financial and social consequences. While the most accurate investigation is specific inhalation challenge in an experienced centre, this is a scarce resource, and in many cases, reliance is on other tests. This review provides a technical dossier of the diagnostic value of the available methods which include an appropriate clinical history, the use of specific immunology and measurement of inflammatory markers, and various methods of relating functional changes in airway calibre to periods at work. It is recommended that these approaches are used iteratively and in judicious combination, in cognizance of the individual patient's circumstances and requirements. Based on available evidence, a working diagnostic algorithm is proposed that can be adapted to the suspected agent, purpose of diagnosis and available resources. For better or worse, many of the techniques - and their interpretation - are available only in specialized centres and where there is room for doubt, referral to such a centre is probably wise. Accordingly, the implementation or development of such specialized centres with appropriate equipment and expertise should greatly improve the diagnostic evaluation of work-related asthma.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27883240     DOI: 10.1111/cea.12858

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Allergy        ISSN: 0954-7894            Impact factor:   5.018


  14 in total

1.  Non-invasive tools beyond lung function before and after specific inhalation challenges for diagnosing occupational asthma.

Authors:  Julia Engel; Vera van Kampen; Vitali Gering; Olaf Hagemeyer; Thomas Brüning; Monika Raulf; Rolf Merget
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 3.015

2.  The validity of the Canadian clinical scores for occupational asthma in European populations.

Authors:  Eva Suarthana; Mahsa Taghiakbari; Paramita Saha-Chaudhuri; Catherine Rifflart; Hille Suojalehto; Pirjo Hölttä; Jolanta Walusiak-Skorupa; Marta Wiszniewska; Xavier Muñoz; Christian Romero-Mesones; Joaquín Sastre; Manuel J Rial; Paul K Henneberger; Olivier Vandenplas
Journal:  Allergy       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 13.146

Review 3.  Occupational asthma risk from exposures to toluene diisocyanate: A review and risk assessment.

Authors:  Robert D Daniels
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 2.214

4.  Work-Related Symptoms of Patients with Asthma: A Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Dilşad Mungan; İpek Özmen; Fatma Evyapan; Füsun Topçu; Metin Akgün; Peri Arbak; Yılmaz Bülbül
Journal:  Turk Thorac J       Date:  2019-08-19

5.  Mapping Chemical Respiratory Sensitization: How Useful Are Our Current Computational Tools?

Authors:  Emily Golden; Mikhail Maertens; Thomas Hartung; Alexandra Maertens
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 3.739

Review 6.  Addressing Molecular Diagnosis of Occupational Allergies.

Authors:  Monika Raulf; Santiago Quirce; Olivier Vandenplas
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 7.  Progress in Occupational Asthma.

Authors:  Angelica I Tiotiu; Silviya Novakova; Marina Labor; Alexander Emelyanov; Stefan Mihaicuta; Plamena Novakova; Denislava Nedeva
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 8.  Skin Exposure Contributes to Chemical-Induced Asthma: What is the Evidence? A Systematic Review of Animal Models.

Authors:  Hung Chang Tsui; Steven Ronsmans; Laurens J De Sadeleer; Peter H M Hoet; Benoit Nemery; Jeroen A J Vanoirbeek
Journal:  Allergy Asthma Immunol Res       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 5.764

9.  Bronchial Response to High and Low Molecular Weight Occupational Inhalant Allergens.

Authors:  Agnieszka Lipińska-Ojrzanowska; Ewa Nowakowska-Świrta; Marta Wiszniewska; Jolanta Walusiak-Skorupa
Journal:  Allergy Asthma Immunol Res       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 5.764

Review 10.  Work-related asthma: A position paper from the Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand and the National Asthma Council Australia.

Authors:  Ryan Hoy; Jonathan Burdon; Ling Chen; Susan Miles; Jennifer L Perret; Shivonne Prasad; Naghmeh Radhakrishna; Janet Rimmer; Malcolm R Sim; Deborah Yates; Graeme Zosky
Journal:  Respirology       Date:  2020-10-05       Impact factor: 6.424

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.