E Y Lau1, G Faulkner1, W Qian2, S T Leatherdale2. 1. School of Kinesiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. 2. School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: To examine temporal variations in parental and peer influences on adolescent physical activity (PA) and whether these variations predicted changes in PA. METHODS: We analyzed data from Years 1, 2 and 3 of the COMPASS study. Participants were 22 909 students in Grades 9 to 12 (mean age [years] = 15.42 ± 1.12, 46% boys, 85% White), who had completed the following survey items on 2 or more consecutive occasions: age, sex, grade, race/ethnicity, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), parental encouragement and parental instrumental support for PA, and number of active peers. We used a linear-mixed model to investigate longitudinal effects of parental and peer influences on changes in square-root transformed average MVPA. We used a generalized-estimating-equations (GEE) model to investigate compliance with Canadian PA guidelines for youth. These models included parental encouragement, instrumental support and number of active peers as time-varying predictors, adjusting for sociodemog raphic factors and grade as covariates, and accounting for the clustering within children and schools. RESULTS: We found that adolescents perceived significantly less parental encouragement and instrumental support and reported fewer active peers as they got older. In addition, the adjusted models suggest that, for a one-unit increase in the score of parental encouragement, parental instrumental support and number of active peers, average MVPA significantly increased by 0.22 units, 0.23 units and 0.16 units, respectively. For the same one-unit increase, adjusted odds of an adolescent complying with the PA guidelines increased by 9%, 4% and 6%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Promoting parental support and facilitating the formation and maintenance of a physically active friendship network may play an important role in attenuating declines in PA during adolescence.
INTRODUCTION: To examine temporal variations in parental and peer influences on adolescent physical activity (PA) and whether these variations predicted changes in PA. METHODS: We analyzed data from Years 1, 2 and 3 of the COMPASS study. Participants were 22 909 students in Grades 9 to 12 (mean age [years] = 15.42 ± 1.12, 46% boys, 85% White), who had completed the following survey items on 2 or more consecutive occasions: age, sex, grade, race/ethnicity, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), parental encouragement and parental instrumental support for PA, and number of active peers. We used a linear-mixed model to investigate longitudinal effects of parental and peer influences on changes in square-root transformed average MVPA. We used a generalized-estimating-equations (GEE) model to investigate compliance with Canadian PA guidelines for youth. These models included parental encouragement, instrumental support and number of active peers as time-varying predictors, adjusting for sociodemog raphic factors and grade as covariates, and accounting for the clustering within children and schools. RESULTS: We found that adolescents perceived significantly less parental encouragement and instrumental support and reported fewer active peers as they got older. In addition, the adjusted models suggest that, for a one-unit increase in the score of parental encouragement, parental instrumental support and number of active peers, average MVPA significantly increased by 0.22 units, 0.23 units and 0.16 units, respectively. For the same one-unit increase, adjusted odds of an adolescent complying with the PA guidelines increased by 9%, 4% and 6%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Promoting parental support and facilitating the formation and maintenance of a physically active friendship network may play an important role in attenuating declines in PA during adolescence.
Entities:
Keywords:
active peers; parental encouragement; parental instrumental support; physical activity
Authors: Wendy Van Lippevelde; Maïté Verloigne; Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij; Johannes Brug; Mona Bjelland; Nanna Lien; Lea Maes Journal: Int J Public Health Date: 2012-08 Impact factor: 3.380
Authors: Joanna L Morrissey; Kathleen F Janz; Elena M Letuchy; Shelby L Francis; Steven M Levy Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2015-08-20 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: M Claire Buchan; Valerie Carson; Guy Faulkner; Wei Qian; Scott T Leatherdale Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-07-24 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Steffen Ce Schmidt; Jennifer Schneider; Anne Kerstin Reimers; Claudia Niessner; Alexander Woll Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-01-31 Impact factor: 3.390