Literature DB >> 27882631

Adolescents' inhibitory control: keep it cool or lose control.

Ania Aïte1, Mathieu Cassotti1,2, Adriano Linzarini1, Anaïs Osmont1, Olivier Houdé1,2, Grégoire Borst1,2.   

Abstract

Inhibitory control (i.e., the ability to resist automatisms, temptations, distractions, or interference and to adapt to conflicting situations) is a determinant of cognitive and socio-emotional development. In light of the discrepancies of previous findings on the development of inhibitory control in affectively charged contexts, two important issues need to be addressed. We need to determine (a) whether cool inhibitory control (in affectively neutral contexts) and hot inhibitory control (in affectively charged contexts) follow the same developmental pattern and (b) the degree of specificity of these two types of inhibitory control at different ages. Thus, in the present study, we investigated the developmental patterns of cool and hot inhibitory control and the degree of specificity of these abilities in children, adolescents and adults. Typically developing children, adolescents, and adults performed two Stroop-like tasks: an affectively neutral one (Cool Stroop task) and an affectively charged one (Hot Stroop task). In the Cool Stroop task, the participants were asked to identify the ink color of the words independent of color that the words named; in the Hot Stroop task, the participants were asked to identify the emotional expression of a face independent of the emotion named by a simultaneously displayed written word. We found that cool inhibitory control abilities develop linearly with age, whereas hot inhibitory control abilities follow a quadratic developmental pattern, with adolescents displaying worse hot inhibitory control abilities than children and adults. In addition, cool and hot inhibitory control abilities were correlated in children but not in adolescents and adults. The present study suggests (a) that cool and hot inhibitory control abilities develop differently from childhood to adulthood - i.e., that cool inhibition follows a linear developmental pattern and hot inhibition follows an adolescent-specific pattern - and (b) that they become progressively more domain-specific with age.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27882631     DOI: 10.1111/desc.12491

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Sci        ISSN: 1363-755X


  8 in total

Review 1.  A Lifespan Model of Interference Resolution and Inhibitory Control: Risk for Depression and Changes with Illness Progression.

Authors:  Katie L Bessette; Aimee J Karstens; Natania A Crane; Amy T Peters; Jonathan P Stange; Kathleen H Elverman; Sarah Shizuko Morimoto; Sara L Weisenbach; Scott A Langenecker
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 7.444

2.  Parenting and the Development of Impulse Control in Youth with Type 1 Diabetes: The Mediating Role of Negative Affect.

Authors:  Karol Silva; Victoria A Miller
Journal:  Appl Dev Sci       Date:  2019-12-18

3.  Developing Students' Emotional Competencies in English Language Classes: Reciprocal Benefits and Practical Implications.

Authors:  Philippe Gay; Slavka Pogranova; Laetitia Mauroux; Estelle Trisconi; Emily Rankin; Rebecca Shankland
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 4.614

4.  Pre-adolescent stress disrupts adult, but not adolescent, safety learning.

Authors:  Heidi C Meyer; Danielle M Gerhard; Paia A Amelio; Francis S Lee
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2020-11-07       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Working Memory Training in Adolescents Decreases Laboratory Risk Taking in the Presence of Peers.

Authors:  Gail M Rosenbaum; Morgan A Botdorf; Jamie L Patrianakos; Laurence Steinberg; Jason M Chein
Journal:  J Cogn Enhanc       Date:  2017-10-23

6.  Age-related differences in affective control and its association with mental health difficulties.

Authors:  Susanne Schweizer; Jenna Parker; Jovita T Leung; Cait Griffin; Sarah-Jayne Blakemore
Journal:  Dev Psychopathol       Date:  2020-02

7.  Distinct neural activation patterns of age in subcomponents of inhibitory control: A fMRI meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jixin Long; Xiaoqi Song; You Wang; Chanyu Wang; Ruiwang Huang; Ruibin Zhang
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 5.702

8.  Functional Connectivity Predicts Individual Development of Inhibitory Control during Adolescence.

Authors:  Haiyan Wang; Lingzhong Fan; Ming Song; Bing Liu; Dongya Wu; Rongtao Jiang; Jin Li; Ang Li; Tobias Banaschewski; Arun L W Bokde; Erin Burke Quinlan; Sylvane Desrivières; Herta Flor; Antoine Grigis; Hugh Garavan; Bader Chaarani; Penny Gowland; Andreas Heinz; Bernd Ittermann; Jean-Luc Martinot; Marie-Laure Paillère Martinot; Eric Artiges; Frauke Nees; Dimitri Papadopoulos Orfanos; Luise Poustka; Sabina Millenet; Juliane H Fröhner; Michael N Smolka; Henrik Walter; Robert Whelan; Gunter Schumann; Tianzi Jiang
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 4.861

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.