Literature DB >> 27882398

Supine position and REM dependence in obstructive sleep apnea : Critical model considerations.

A Steffen1, L Maibücher2, I R König3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: When considering supine position and REM dependence, many studies refer to the traditional definition in which obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) severity is at least doubled in the corresponding position/sleep stage (Cartwright index). The lack of consideration of the time spent in that particular sleep situation can lead to clinical bias. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two cohorts of patients with at least moderate OSA were analyzed retrospectively for anthropometric associations and correlations with OSA severity. One group consisted of 48 patients diagnosed using a polygraph, and the other group of 222 patients underwent polysomnography. First, the conventional Cartwright index was used, and a modified index was later applied to integrate the relative time component for REM sleep and the supine position.
RESULTS: Less than a fifth of the patients fulfilled the classic conditions for supine position or REM sleep dependency. There were no definitive cut-offs in the classic or modified Cartwright index with regard to daytime sleepiness. Both indices show there was a correlation between OSA severity and being overweight.
CONCLUSION: The modified Cartwright index allowed us to identify borderline cases that were characterized by a very low or high amount of time spent in the supine position or REM sleep situation. Therapy effects that could have been biased only by varying amounts of time spent in the supine position could be better controlled for. Future studies will possibly include various other ratios besides the previously accepted 2:1 ratio when different statistical parameters are considered, such as the reduction of OSA severity or therapy adherence.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Polysomnography; Sleep apnea syndromes; Sleep stages; Sleep-disordered breathing; Supine position

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27882398     DOI: 10.1007/s00106-016-0265-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HNO        ISSN: 0017-6192            Impact factor:   1.284


  22 in total

Review 1.  The undervalued potential of positional therapy in position-dependent snoring and obstructive sleep apnea-a review of the literature.

Authors:  M J L Ravesloot; J P van Maanen; L Dun; N de Vries
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2012-03-24       Impact factor: 2.816

2.  Positional vs nonpositional obstructive sleep apnea patients: anthropomorphic, nocturnal polysomnographic, and multiple sleep latency test data.

Authors:  A Oksenberg; D S Silverberg; E Arons; H Radwan
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 9.410

3.  Treatment outcomes of mandibular advancement devices in positional and nonpositional OSA patients.

Authors:  Jin Woo Chung; Reyes Enciso; Daniel J Levendowski; Todd D Morgan; Philip R Westbrook; Glenn T Clark
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2010-03-17

4.  Obstructive sleep apnea during REM sleep and hypertension. results of the Wisconsin Sleep Cohort.

Authors:  Babak Mokhlesi; Laurel A Finn; Erika W Hagen; Terry Young; Khin Mae Hla; Eve Van Cauter; Paul E Peppard
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 21.405

5.  Gender differences in the polysomnographic features of obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  C O'Connor; K S Thornley; P J Hanly
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 21.405

6.  Effect of uvulopalatopharyngoplasty on positional dependency in obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Chul Hee Lee; Sang-Wook Kim; Kyuhee Han; Jae-Min Shin; Sung-Lyong Hong; Ji-Eun Lee; Chae-Seo Rhee; Jeong-Whun Kim
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-07

7.  The effect of weight loss on OSA severity and position dependence in the bariatric population.

Authors:  S Morong; L B L Benoist; M J L Ravesloot; D M Laman; N de Vries
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2014-03-01       Impact factor: 2.816

8.  Are the adverse effects of body position in patients with obstructive sleep apnea dependent on sleep stage?

Authors:  M Jeffery Mador; Youngmi Choi; Abid Bhat; Jacek Dmochowski; Mark Braun; V A Gottumukkala; Brydon J Grant
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 2.816

9.  Effect of sleep position on sleep apnea severity.

Authors:  R D Cartwright
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 5.849

10.  The high dependency of supine position in obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Selma F Guven; Bulent Ciftci; Huseyin Lakadamyali; Tansu U Ciftci
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.484

View more
  5 in total

1.  The prevalence of REM-related obstructive sleep apnoea is reduced by the AASM 2012 hypopnoea criteria.

Authors:  Brett Duce; Antti Kulkas; Christian Langton; Juha Töyräs; Craig Hukins
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 2.816

2.  Evaluation of body position in upper airway stimulation for obstructive sleep apnea-is continuous voltage sufficient enough?

Authors:  Armin Steffen; Julia T Hartmann; Inke R König; Madeline J L Ravesloot; Benedikt Hofauer; Clemens Heiser
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 2.816

3.  [Sleep position trainers for treatment of supine obstructive sleep apnea : A comparison of two different training modalities].

Authors:  C Heiser; U Strassen; A Knopf; Y Leuchten; B Hofauer
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Incidence of Sleep Bruxism in Different Phenotypes of Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

Authors:  Joanna Smardz; Mieszko Wieckiewicz; Anna Wojakowska; Monika Michalek-Zrabkowska; Rafal Poreba; Pawel Gac; Grzegorz Mazur; Helena Martynowicz
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 4.964

5.  Snoring: is a reliable assessment possible?

Authors:  René Fischer; Thomas S Kuehnel; Veronika Vielsmeier; Frank Haubner; Steffen Mueller; Christian Rohrmeier
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 2.503

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.