| Literature DB >> 27882326 |
Giridhar Kaliki Venkata1, John R Forder2, Dan Clark2, Andre Shih3, Sharda Udassi4, Srinivasarao Badugu5, Melissa A Lamb6, Stacy L Porvasnik7, Renata S Shih7, Dalia Colon-Lopez7, Arno L Zaritsky8, Ikram U Haque9, Jai P Udassi10.
Abstract
Objective. Decreased cardiac function after resuscitation from cardiac arrest (CA) results from global ischemia of the myocardium. In the evolution of postarrest myocardial dysfunction, preferential involvement of any coronary arterial territory is not known. We hypothesized that there is no preferential involvement of any coronary artery during electrical induced ventricular fibrillation (VF) in piglet model. Design. Prospective, randomized controlled study. Methods. 12 piglets were randomized to baseline and electrical induced VF. After 5 min, the animals were resuscitated according to AHA PALS guidelines. After return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), animals were observed for an additional 4 hours prior to cardiac MRI. Data (mean ± SD) was analyzed using unpaired t-test; p value ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results. Segmental wall motion (mm; baseline versus postarrest group) in segment 7 (left anterior descending (LAD)) was 4.68 ± 0.54 versus 3.31 ± 0.64, p = 0.0026. In segment 13, it was 3.82 ± 0.96 versus 2.58 ± 0.82, p = 0.02. In segment 14, it was 2.42 ± 0.44 versus 1.29 ± 0.99, p = 0.028. Conclusion. Postarrest myocardial dysfunction resulted in segmental wall motion defects in the LAD territory. There were no perfusion defects in the involved segments.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27882326 PMCID: PMC5110865 DOI: 10.1155/2016/5958196
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Baseline animal characteristics.
| Parameter | Baseline | Cardiac arrest |
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 6 | 6 | n/a |
| Age, weeks | 6 | 6 | n/a |
| Weight, Kg | 16.15 ± 2.23 | 13.88 ± 0.79 | 0.05 |
| Length, m | 0.76 ± 0.02 | 0.77 ± 0.01 | 0.37 |
| BSA, Kg/m2 | 0.54 ± 0.03 | 0.51 ± 0.01 | 0.14 |
BSA, body surface area.
Basic hemodynamic parameters.
| Parameter | Baseline | Cardiac arrest |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Heart rate, bpm | 92.33 ± 8.52 | 118.33 ± 33.15 | 0.03 |
| Ejection fraction, % | 46.43 ± 9.62 | 39.52 ± 13.51 | 0.17 |
| Stroke volume, mL | 18.34 ± 4.12 | 16.20 ± 5.16 | 0.24 |
| Stroke Volume Index | 33.54 ± 6.64 | 31.35 ± 9.93 | 0.35 |
| LVEDV, mL | 39.48 ± 3.36 | 43.02 ± 11.12 | 0.23 |
| LVEDVI | 72.74 ± 7.49 | 83.16 ± 20.70 | 0.13 |
| LVESV, mL | 21.13 ± 4.05 | 26.82 ± 11.59 | 0.14 |
| LVESVI | 39.19 ± 9.27 | 51.81 ± 22.02 | 0.11 |
| CO, L/min | 1.67 ± 0.32 | 1.93 ± 0.92 | 0.25 |
| CI, L/min/m2 | 3.06 ± 0.46 | 3.75 ± 1.82 | 0.19 |
bpm: beats per minute; LVEDV: Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume; LVEDVI: Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume Index; LVESV: Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume; LVESVI: Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume Index; CO: cardiac output; CI: cardiac index.
Segmental wall motion analysis (mm).
| Parameters | Baseline | Cardiac arrest |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Segment 7 | 4.68 ± 0.54 | 3.31 ± 0.64 | 0.002 |
| Segment 13 | 3.82 ± 0.96 | 2.58 ± 0.82 | 0.02 |
| Segment 14 | 2.42 ± 0.44 | 1.29 ± 0.99 | 0.02 |
Figure 1(a) Bull's eye representation of segmental wall motion score of baseline animal. (b) Bull's eye representation of segmental wall motion score of the same animal in Figure 1(a) but after resuscitation.