Literature DB >> 27881799

Water-deficit and fungal infection can differentially affect the production of different classes of defense compounds in two host pines of mountain pine beetle.

Nadir Erbilgin1, Jonathan A Cale1, Inka Lusebrink1,2, Ahmed Najar1, Jennifer G Klutsch1, Patrick Sherwood3,4, Pierluigi Enrico Bonello3, Maya L Evenden2.   

Abstract

Bark beetles are important agents of tree mortality in conifer forests and their interaction with trees is influenced by host defense chemicals, such as monoterpenes and phenolics. Since mountain pine beetle (Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins) has expanded its host range from lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta Doug. ex Loud. (var. latifolia Engelm.))-dominated forests to the novel jack pine (Pinus banksiana Lamb.) forests in western Canada, studies investigating the jack pine suitability as a host for this beetle have exclusively focused on monoterpenes, and whether phenolics affect jack pine suitability to mountain pine beetle and its symbiotic fungus Grosmannia clavigera is unknown. We investigated the phenolic and monoterpene composition in phloem and foliage of jack and lodgepole pines, and their subsequent change in response to water deficit and G. clavigera inoculation treatments. In lodgepole pine phloem, water deficit treatment inhibited the accumulation of both the total and richness of phenolics, but had no effect on total monoterpene production or richness. Fungal infection also inhibited the total phenolic production and had no effect on phenolic or monoterpene richness, but increased total monoterpene synthesis by 71%. In jack pine phloem, water deficit treatment reduced phenolic production, but had no effect on phenolic or monoterpene richness or total monoterpenes. Fungal infection did not affect phenolic or monoterpene production. Lesions of both species contained lower phenolics but higher monoterpenes than non-infected phloem in the same tree. In both species, richness of monoterpenes and phenolics was greater in non-infected phloem than in lesions. We conclude that monoterpenes seem to be a critical component of induced defenses against G. clavigera in both jack and lodgepole pines; however, a lack of increased monoterpene response to fungal infection is an important evolutionary factor defining jack pine suitability to the mountain pine beetle invasion in western Canada.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Canadian boreal forest; chemical defenses; constitutive and induced plant defenses; invasion dynamics; secondary compounds of phloem and foliage

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27881799     DOI: 10.1093/treephys/tpw105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tree Physiol        ISSN: 0829-318X            Impact factor:   4.196


  5 in total

1.  Successful Colonization of Lodgepole Pine Trees by Mountain Pine Beetle Increased Monoterpene Production and Exhausted Carbohydrate Reserves.

Authors:  Marla Roth; Altaf Hussain; Jonathan A Cale; Nadir Erbilgin
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  A Native Parasitic Plant Systemically Induces Resistance in Jack Pine to a Fungal Symbiont of Invasive Mountain Pine Beetle.

Authors:  Jennifer G Klutsch; Ahmed Najar; Patrick Sherwood; Pierluigi Bonello; Nadir Erbilgin
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Ectomycorrhizal fungal species differentially affect the induced defensive chemistry of lodgepole pine.

Authors:  Sanat S Kanekar; Jonathan A Cale; Nadir Erbilgin
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2018-07-21       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Drought stress leads to systemic induced susceptibility to a nectrotrophic fungus associated with mountain pine beetle in Pinus banksiana seedlings.

Authors:  Jennifer G Klutsch; Simon Francis Shamoun; Nadir Erbilgin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Factors governing outbreak dynamics in a forest intensively managed for mountain pine beetle.

Authors:  Mélodie Kunegel-Lion; Mark A Lewis
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.