Literature DB >> 27881319

Influence of remaining tooth structure and restorative material type on stress distribution in endodontically treated maxillary premolars: A finite element analysis.

Junxin Zhu1, Qiguo Rong2, Xiaoyan Wang3, Xuejun Gao4.   

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: How tooth preparation and material type affect the stress distribution of endodontically treated teeth restored with endocrowns remains unclear.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this finite element (FE) study was to determine the influence of the quantity of remaining dental tissues and material type on stress distribution in endodontically treated maxillary premolars using 3-dimensional FE analysis.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Five 3-dimensional FE models were constructed on the basis of the restorative methods used and the quantity of preserved tooth tissues: a sound maxillary premolar, an endodontically treated maxillary premolar restored with composite resin, and endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with endocrowns with thicknesses of 1.0 mm, 2.0 mm, and 3.0 mm. The following endocrown materials were used: Paradigm MZ100, IPS Empress, IPS e.max CAD, and In-Ceram Zirconia. Stress distributions were analyzed under vertical and oblique loads.
RESULTS: As the quantity of preserved dental tissues increased, the von Mises stress in dentin decreased, and the peak von Mises strain value of the cement layer increased. When the elastic modulus of the endocrown material increased, the von Mises stress in endocrown and dentin increased, and the peak von Mises strain value of the cement layer decreased.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the conservative preparation of teeth for endocrowns is likely to protect the residual tooth structure, it may cause future cohesive bonding failure. An increase in the elastic modulus of the material may benefit the durability of bonding between the endocrown and the abutment tooth; however, it may cause fracture of the residual tooth structure.
Copyright © 2016 Editorial Council for the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27881319     DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.08.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  13 in total

1.  [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of cuspal-coverage thickness influence on the stress distribution of all-ceramic onlay-restored premolars].

Authors:  Ya-Hu She; Yi-Yi Zhang; Yu-Xuan Liu; Chang-Yun Fang
Journal:  Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2019-12-01

2.  [Influence of base materials on stress distribution in endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with endocrowns].

Authors:  Y S Jiang; L Feng; X J Gao
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2021-08-18

3.  Investigating inlay designs of class II cavity with deep margin elevation using finite element method.

Authors:  Yung-Chung Chen; Chi-Lun Lin; Chun-Hsien Hou
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-05-16       Impact factor: 2.757

4.  Dentists' decisions regarding the need for cuspal coverage for endodontically treated and vital posterior teeth.

Authors:  Motasum Abu-Awwad
Journal:  Clin Exp Dent Res       Date:  2019-04-15

5.  Resistance fracture of minimally prepared endocrowns made by three types of restorative materials: a 3D finite element analysis.

Authors:  Qingzhen Meng; Yuejiao Zhang; Danlu Chi; Qimei Gong; Zhongchun Tong
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2021-10-30       Impact factor: 3.896

6.  Influence of margin design and restorative material on the stress distribution of endocrowns: a 3D finite element analysis.

Authors:  Ziting Zheng; Jieli Sun; Lifang Jiang; Yuan Wu; Jiahui He; Wenhao Ruan; Wenjuan Yan
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2022-02-05       Impact factor: 2.757

7.  Endocrown restorations for extensively damaged posterior teeth: clinical performance of three cases.

Authors:  Konstantinos Tzimas; Maria Tsiafitsa; Paris Gerasimou; Effrosyni Tsitrou
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2018-08-22

8.  Influence of substrate design for in vitro mechanical testing.

Authors:  Amanda-Maria-de Oliveira Dal Piva; João-Paulo-Mendes Tribst; Alexandre-Luiz-Souto Borges; Renata-Marques de Melo; Marco-Antonio Bottino
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2019-02-01

9.  Marginal gap and fracture resistance of CAD/CAM ceramill COMP and cerasmart endocrowns for restoring endodontically treated molars bonded with two adhesive protocols: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Israa Atif Kassem; Ibrahim Elsebai Farrag; Samir Mahmoud Zidan; Jylan Fouad ElGuindy; Reham Said Elbasty
Journal:  Biomater Investig Dent       Date:  2020-02-25

10.  Computer-aided design finite element modeling of different approaches to rehabilitate endodontically treated teeth.

Authors:  Gabriela Fernandes da Fonseca; Guilherme Schmitt de Andrade; Amanda Maria de Oliveira Dal Piva; João Paulo Mendes Tribst; Alexandre Luiz Souto Borges
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2018 Oct-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.