Literature DB >> 27881254

Health Technology Assessment, International Reference Pricing, and Budget Control Tools from China's Perspective: What Are the Current Developments and Future Considerations?

Liling Koh1, Christoph Glaetzer2, Shu Chuen Li3, Meng Zhang4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: China is investing considerably in health care reforms to address issues in its health care system. An example is access to innovative drugs, which remains challenging because it is largely dependent on patient self-pay. Recognizing this, the government has invested considerably in its basic medical insurance. As health care expenditure increases, there are growing concerns on budget control. Several health policy tools have been discussed recently such as health technology assessment, international reference pricing, and hospital budget control tools, which can be viewed as addressing the affordability concerns of the government budget. China has also listed her health outcomes goals in "Healthy China 2020" initiative.
OBJECTIVES: This article aimed to discuss the "fit-for-purpose" of these tools to address budget concerns and support China in reaching her health outcomes goals.
METHODS: The findings are informed by a panel discussion at ISPOR Asia Pacific 2014, literature review, and authors' experience. This review looks at the current developments in China and the considerations and implications for using these tools by drawing experiences from countries where they are used.
RESULTS: These tools are generally used in countries with advanced health care systems. China's health care spending is still below that of countries with advanced health care systems and below World Health Organization recommendation.
CONCLUSIONS: China has not yet reached the "critical mass" necessary for the effective use of these tools. As China continues its health care reforms, increase in health care spending to balance the health needs of the population would be key. Copyright Â
© 2015. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  China; HTA; health technology assessment; international reference pricing

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 27881254     DOI: 10.1016/j.vhri.2015.06.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Value Health Reg Issues        ISSN: 2212-1099


  4 in total

1.  Variations in external reference pricing implementation: does it matter for public policy?

Authors:  Jennifer Gill; Anna-Maria Fontrier; Dionysis Kyriopoulos; Panos Kanavos
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2019-08-23

2.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of capecitabine monotherapy versus capecitabine plus oxaliplatin in elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Authors:  Jingyuan Peng; Chongqing Tan; Xiaohui Zeng; Shikun Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Strengthening health technology assessment systems in the global south: a comparative analysis of the HTA journeys of China, India and South Africa.

Authors:  Kim MacQuilkan; Peter Baker; Laura Downey; Francis Ruiz; Kalipso Chalkidou; Shankar Prinja; Kun Zhao; Thomas Wilkinson; Amanda Glassman; Karen Hofman
Journal:  Glob Health Action       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 2.640

4.  Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Hepatic Arterial Infusion of FOLFOX Combined Sorafenib for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Portal Vein Invasion.

Authors:  Meiyue Li; Shen Lin; Leslie Wilson; Pinfang Huang; Hang Wang; Shubin Lai; Liangliang Dong; Xiongwei Xu; Xiuhua Weng
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 6.244

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.