| Literature DB >> 27881156 |
Nguyen Thi Xuan1, Phi Thi Thu Trang2, Nguyen Van Phong2, Nguyen Linh Toan3, Do Minh Trung4, Nguyen Duy Bac5, Viet Linh Nguyen6, Nguyen Huy Hoang2, Nong Van Hai2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Dendritic cells (DCs) are the most potent professional antigen-presenting cells for naive T cells to link innate and acquired immunity. Klotho, an anti-aging protein, participates in the regulation of Ca2+ dependent migration in DCs. Vitamin E (VitE) is an essential antioxidant to protect cells from damage and elicits its inhibitory effects on NF-κB-mediated inflammatory response. However, the roles of VitE on mouse DC functions and the contribution of klotho to those effects both are unknown. The present study explored the effects of VitE on klotho expression, maturation, ROS production and migration in DCs.Entities:
Keywords: Dendritic cells; Klotho; LPS; Migration; ROS; Vitamin E
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27881156 PMCID: PMC5121936 DOI: 10.1186/s40659-016-0105-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biol Res ISSN: 0716-9760 Impact factor: 5.612
Fig. 1Effect of VitE on klotho expression. a Original Western blot of DCs were either treated with LPS (100 ng/ml) in the presence or absence of VitE (500 µM, 2 h) or left untreated (control). Protein extracts were analyzed by direct Western blotting using antibodies directed against p-IκBα and GAPDH. b Arithmetic mean ± SEM (n = 4) of the abundance of p-IκBα protein as the ratio of p-IκBα/GAPDH. c Arithmetic mean ± SEM (n = 5) of klotho transcript level is shown prior to control (white bar) and 5 h following incubation with VitE (500 µM) either in the absence (black bar) or presence of NF-κB inhibitor Bay 11-7082 (10 µM, grey bar). d Immunoprecipitation of klotho in DC supernatants is shown prior to control (1st panel) and 5 h following treatment with VitE (500 µM) either in the absence (2nd panel) or presence (3rd panel) of Bay 11-7082 (10 µM). Immunoprecipitates were stained for klotho and GAPDH antibodies. e Arithmetic mean ± SEM (n = 5) of the abundance of klotho protein as the ratio of klotho/GAPDH. *(p < 0.05) represent significant difference from control DCs, and #(p < 0.05) indicates significant difference from VitE-treated DCs (ANOVA)
Fig. 2Effect of VitE on DC maturation. a Original dot plots representing the percentage of CD11c+CD86+ control-(1st line) and klotho-silenced (2nd line) DCs is shown prior to control (1st panel) and 24 h following treatment with LPS (100 ng/ml) either in the absence (2nd panel) or presence of VitE (3rd panel). b Arithmetic mean ± SEM (n = 5) of CD11c+CD86+ cells is shown prior to control (1st panel) and 24 h following treatment with LPS (100 ng/ml) either in the absence (2nd bar) or presence of VitE (3rd bar) or presence of VitE and Bay 11-7082 (10 µM) (4th bar). c Arithmetic mean ± SEM (n = 4) of CD11c+CD86+ cells transfected with klotho siRNA is shown prior to control (1st panel) and 24 h following treatment with LPS (100 ng/ml) either in the absence (2nd bar) or presence (3rd bar) of VitE. d, g Arithmetic mean ± SEM (n = 5–7) of IL12p70 and TNF-α production in DCs are shown prior to control (white bar) and 24 h following treatment with LPS (100 ng/ml) either in the absence (2nd bar) or presence of VitE (3rd bar) or presence of VitE and Bay 11-7082 (10 µM) (4th bar). e, h Arithmetic mean ± SEM (n = 5–7) of IL12p70 and TNF-α production in DCs transfected with klotho siRNA are shown prior to control (1st bar) and 24 h following treatment with LPS (100 ng/ml) either in the absence (2nd bar) or presence (3rd bar) of VitE. f Original dot plots representing the percentage of CD11c+IL-12p70+ control-(1st line) and klotho-silenced (2nd line) DCs is shown prior to control (1st panel) and 24 h following treatment with LPS (100 ng/ml) either in the absence (2nd panel) or presence of VitE (3rd panel). *(p < 0.05) represents significant difference from LPS-stimulated DCs; ##(p < 0.01) and ###(p < 0.001) indicate significant difference from LPS and VitE- treated DCs (ANOVA)
Fig. 3Effect of VitE on ROS formation. a Representative FACS histograms depicting ROS-dependent DCFDA fluorescence in control-(1st panel) and klotho-silenced (2nd panel) DCs are untreated (gray filled) or treated with LPS in the absence (solid line) or presence (dotted line) of VitE. b Arithmetic mean ± SEM (n = 5) of ROS production in DCs is shown prior to control (white bar) and 24 h following treatment with LPS (100 ng/ml) either in the absence (2nd bar) or presence of VitE (3rd bar) or presence of VitE and Bay 11-7082 (10 µM) (4th bar). c Arithmetic mean ± SEM (n = 5) of ROS production in DCs transfected with klotho siRNA is shown prior to control (1st panel) and 24 h following treatment with LPS (100 ng/ml) either in the absence (2nd bar) or presence (3rd bar) of VitE. *(p < 0.05) represents significant difference from LPS-stimulated DCs (ANOVA)
Fig. 4Effect of VitE on DC migration. a Arithmetic mean ± SEM (n = 5) of the normalized migration of DCs is shown prior to control (white bar) and 24 h following treatment with LPS (100 ng/ml) either in the absence (2nd bar) or presence of VitE (3rd bar) or presence of VitE and Bay 11-7082 (10 µM) (4th bar). b Arithmetic mean ± SEM (n = 5) of the normalized migration of DCs transfected with klotho siRNA is shown prior to control (1st panel) and 24 h following treatment with LPS (100 ng/ml) either in the absence (2nd bar) or presence (3rd bar) of VitE. *(p < 0.05) represents significant difference from LPS-stimulated DCs; ##(p < 0.01) indicates significant difference from LPS and VitE- treated DCs (ANOVA)