| Literature DB >> 27881075 |
Marco Fondi1, Emanuele Bosi2, Luana Presta2, Diletta Natoli2, Renato Fani2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In their natural environment, bacteria face a wide range of environmental conditions that change over time and that impose continuous rearrangements at all the cellular levels (e.g. gene expression, metabolism). When facing a nutritionally rich environment, for example, microbes first use the preferred compound(s) and only later start metabolizing the other one(s). A systemic re-organization of the overall microbial metabolic network in response to a variation in the composition/concentration of the surrounding nutrients has been suggested, although the range and the entity of such modifications in organisms other than a few model microbes has been scarcely described up to now.Entities:
Keywords: Antarctic bacteria; Flux balance analysis; Metabolic modelling; Pseudoalteromonas haloplanktis TAC125
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27881075 PMCID: PMC5121958 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-016-3311-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 3.969
Fig. 1Summary of PhTAC125 genome-scale reprogramming following nutrients switching. a. The nutrients provided to the model in each different growth phase according to [14] b. Heat map with log values of fluxes across all the phases. c. Number of flux carrying reactions in each growth phase. d. Number of flux-changing reactions in each growth phase. The dashed line represents the average number of reactions carrying flux over all time points. e. Number of reactions whose flux is predicted to increase (blue line) and decrease (red line) following each shift in the nutrients provided; the black line accounts for those reactions whose flux is predicted to decrease not as an effect of an imposed reduced growth rate during simulations. f. functional annotation of reactions varying their flux across all the phases
Fig. 2Changes in the central metabolism of PhTAC125. a. The number of active (flux-carrying) reactions for five major pathways across all the time points is shown. b. A simplified representation of the interconnections in the central metabolism of PhTAC125. Dashed lines indicate the presence of more than one reaction between the connected compounds. Modified from [39]
Fig. 3Comparison between nutritional-MOMA and FBA. Here we show the number of predicted flux carrying reactions in each growth phase for FBA (red) and nutritional-MOMA (blue) optimization on the PhTAC125 model. Also, the number of shared reactions identified by the two approaches is shown (in yellow)
Fig. 4Functional differences between nutritional-MOMA and FBA predictions. Here we show the proportion of reactions predicted to be active by nutritional-MOMA (blue), FBA (red) and both methods (yellow) for each main functional category represented in the PhTAC125 reconstruction
Fig. 5Flux correlation analysis. Heatmap accounting for the Pearson correlation of all the flux difference vectors across all the time points. The metabolic process of each reaction is also reported
Fig. 6a. Co-varying reactions clusters identification. Common flux trends (expressed as the normalized difference between the absolute value of fluxes across each growth phase and the following one) for the reactions embedded in each of the 28 clusters. b. The distribution of STRING combined scores among all the genes embedded in each cluster of genes (primary y axis) and the number of genes embedded by each cluster (secondary y axis, red line). The grey line represents the median of the combined score computed for each possible pair of genes in the model
Fig. 7Sample STRING clusters. Evidence network, co-expression instances and co-occurrence patterns for clusters 23 (a,b, and c, respectively), 11 (d, e and f, respectively) and 2 (g, h and i, respectively). Red asterisks in g indicate those genes known to belong to the same regulon according to RegPrecise database (ArgR regulon)
Main features of the putatively co-regulated clusters found during flux-correlation analysis. In this table, for each cluster, we report its number, the name of the regulator identified, the genes embedded in it and the conserved motif found upstream of its genes
| Cluster name | Motif name | Genes | Weblogo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cluster 2 | ArgR | PSHAa0194, PSHAa0698,PSHAa2175, PSHAa2287, PSHAa2290, PSHAa2291, PSHAa2292, PSHAb0333, PSHAb0428, PSHAb0543 |
|
| Cluster 3 | CcpA | PSHAa0189, PSHAa0609, PSHAa0740, PSHAa1167, PSHAa1648, PSHAa1649, PSHAa1650, PSHAa1651, PSHAa2167, PSHAb0082, PSHAb0345 |
|
| Cluster 6 | GalR | PSHAa0603, PSHAa0871, PSHAa1364, PSHAa1767, PSHAa2301, PSHAb0295 |
|