Literature DB >> 27879975

Metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma response to nivolumab.

Frances M Walocko1, Benjamin Y Scheier2, Paul W Harms3, Leslie A Fecher2, Christopher D Lao2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is an aggressive cutaneous neuroendocrine malignancy with limited treatment options. Several lines of evidence support the programmed death-1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) axis as a likely contributor to immune evasion in MCC. CASE
PRESENTATION: We report a case of a patient with metastatic MCC with a significant and durable response to nivolumab, a humanized IgG4 monoclonal anti-PD-1 antibody.
CONCLUSION: Immunotherapy with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors has become a rational and promising treatment option for MCC in the advanced or metastatic disease. Clinical trials are currently in progress to further evaluate these novel therapeutic agents.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Case report; Immunotherapy; Merkel cell carcinoma; Nivolumab; PD-L1; Polyomavirus

Year:  2016        PMID: 27879975      PMCID: PMC5109712          DOI: 10.1186/s40425-016-0186-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Immunother Cancer        ISSN: 2051-1426            Impact factor:   13.751


Background

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare and aggressive cutaneous neuroendocrine malignancy with an annual incidence rate of 0.6 per 100,000 persons [1]. MCC is frequently diagnosed in the elderly in areas of sun-exposed skin and remains a challenging disease to treat. It has a high frequency of local recurrence (30 %) compared to melanoma (3.8 %), and more than 40 % of patients eventually develop distant metastatic disease [2, 3]. Early stage disease is typically managed by surgical excision with or without radiotherapy [4]. Adjuvant radiotherapy may improve locoregional control for some tumors, but it is unclear if it impacts survival [5, 6]. Patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic disease are most often treated with chemotherapy [7]. While there are currently no Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved therapies for advanced MCC, platinum in combination with etoposide has been the standard for advanced stage MCC based on data from small cell lung carcinoma. Cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and vincristine have also been tried with variable response rates [8]. Unfortunately, responses to chemotherapy are not durable and have not clearly demonstrated a survival advantage [9]. New approaches for the disease are needed.

Case presentation

We report a case of a man in his 80s who initially noted a lesion on his right back thought to be an infected cyst in 2014. Evaluation noted right axillary adenopathy, which prompted a biopsy of the mass and of the cyst-like lesion. Pathology demonstrated morphologic and immunohistochemical (strongly cytokeratin-20, neuron specific enolase and CD56 positive and thyroid transcription factor-1 negative) findings in both lesions consistent with MCC. Polymerase chain reaction performed on deoxyribonucleic acid extracted from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor tissue alongside appropriate controls using a previously described protocol demonstrated that the tumor lacked detectable Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV) large T antigen and small T antigen [10, 11]. Staging fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) revealed lesions in right upper lung, right upper back, right axilla and right adrenal gland consistent with metastatic disease (Fig. 1a, b and c). Subsequent biopsy of the right lung confirmed metastatic MCC. Following extensive discussions regarding the implications and options, he refused chemotherapy. At that time, no clinical trial was available to him, but programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor therapy was being tested on trial (ClinicalTrials.gov. NCT02267603). Nivolumab, a humanized IgG4 monoclonal anti-PD-1 antibody, was obtained from Bristol-Myers-Squibb outside of a clinical trial, and he was subsequently treated with nivolumab 3 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks for six cycles in 2015. Following two cycles, he had an excellent partial response on physical exam with decreased adenopathy. After five cycles, he achieved a marked partial metabolic response by FDG-PET/CT (Fig. 1d, e and f). He continued on therapy, but after cycle six, treatment was complicated by pneumonia and autoimmune hepatitis. He improved on intravenous steroids at an outside hospital and was discharged on prednisone 1 mg/kg per day. He completely recovered with a slow steroid taper, and no further treatment with nivolumab was given. He continued on surveillance alone for 8 months, and his disease remained well controlled with no recurrence on physical exam and at least an excellent partial response in his distant metastasis with no new sites of disease.
Fig. 1

Baseline and repeat FDG-PET/CT scan illustrating areas of FDG uptake. Legend: a, b and c Baseline FDG-PET/CT scan revealed hypermetabolic activity consistent with metastatic disease. d, e and f Repeat FDG-PET/CT scan following cycle 5 of nivolumab demonstrated significant decrease in size and FDG uptake of all sites of disease

Baseline and repeat FDG-PET/CT scan illustrating areas of FDG uptake. Legend: a, b and c Baseline FDG-PET/CT scan revealed hypermetabolic activity consistent with metastatic disease. d, e and f Repeat FDG-PET/CT scan following cycle 5 of nivolumab demonstrated significant decrease in size and FDG uptake of all sites of disease

Conclusions

As our understanding of the oncogenic pathways of MCC evolves, immunotherapy has become a rational and promising treatment option in the advanced or metastatic setting. In 2008, Feng et al. identified a clonally integrated polyomavirus (MCPyV) in the majority (85 %) of human MCCs [12]. Although the oncogenic potential of MCPyV is still being elucidated, the increased risk of MCC in the setting of immunosuppression supports its viral-mediated origin. Circulating antibodies to MCPyV T antigen and MCPyV-specific CD8 and CD4 T-cells have been identified in patients with MCC, but appear unable to eradicate MCPyV positive cells despite immune activation. Several lines of evidence support the expression of programmed death-1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) as a likely contributor to immune evasion in MCC [13, 14]. Lipson et al. analyzed 67 specimens from 49 patients for PD-L1 expression by immunohistochemistry and demonstrated tumor cells and immune infiltrates expressed PD-L1 (49 % and 55 %, respectively) with 97 % of PD-L1-expressing MCC cells geographically associated with immune infiltrates [15]. Afanasiev et al. reported a higher expression of MCPyV specific circulating T-cells with PD-1 expression compared to control Epstein-Barr virus and cytomegalovirus specific T-cells (p < 0.01) [16]. They also found that blocking PD-1 led to augmentation of MCPyV specific T-cell function [16]. Additionally, tumors with high PD-L1 expression were more likely to have CD8 lymphocyte infiltration than tumors with lower PD-L1 expression [16]. Other investigators demonstrated that 50 % of non-activated T cells expressed PD-1, which is thought to be a marker of T cell exhaustion [17]. Taken together, these data strongly support the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitory axis as an immune evasion strategy for MCC, and targeting this negative signal of T-cell activation could be an important treatment approach against MCC. Immunohistochemistry performed retrospectively on the tumor excised from the patient’s back demonstrated variable expression of PD-1 in tumor-associated lymphocytes (Fig. 2a and b). PD-L1 testing demonstrated patchy staining of tumor-associated inflammatory cells, predominantly histiocytes (Fig. 2c and d). There was no significant expression of PD-L1 in MCC tumor cells in comparison to positive controls. This finding is consistent with other cancers treated with PD-1 inhibitors in that PD-L1 expression may not predict the benefit from these agents [18]. Mutational load was not examined in this case. However, based on recent genomic findings in MCPyV-negative tumors, we would predict this MCPyV-negative case to display a high mutational burden with associated neoantigens that may result in susceptibility to immunotherapy [11, 19].
Fig. 2

PD-1 and PD-L1 expression in Merkel cell carcinoma primary tumor from the right upper scapula. Legend: a, b: PD-1 shows patchy expression in tumor-associated lymphocytes. c, d: There is no significant PD-L1 expression in tumor cells. Background inflammatory cells express patchy PD-L1, predominantly in larger cells consistent with histiocytes (yellow arrowheads). Magnification 40x (a, c) or 400x (b, d)

PD-1 and PD-L1 expression in Merkel cell carcinoma primary tumor from the right upper scapula. Legend: a, b: PD-1 shows patchy expression in tumor-associated lymphocytes. c, d: There is no significant PD-L1 expression in tumor cells. Background inflammatory cells express patchy PD-L1, predominantly in larger cells consistent with histiocytes (yellow arrowheads). Magnification 40x (a, c) or 400x (b, d) Preliminary results of two phase II trials provide additional evidence of PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibition as a valid and promising therapeutic approach [20, 21]. Nghiem and colleagues demonstrated that pembrolizumab (a PD-1 inhibitor) has a 56 % overall response rate in chemotherapy naïve patients with response durations ranging from 2.2 months to at least 9.7 months [20]. Avelumab (a PD-L1 inhibitor) was tested in patients with chemotherapy-refractory MCC and was shown to have a response rate of 31.7 %, with 82 % of respondents having ongoing responses at a median follow-up of 10.4 months [21]. This case highlights the potential therapeutic benefit of nivolumab, including durability of response with immunotherapy for MCC. A clinical trial evaluating nivolumab as a treatment option for virus-associated cancers, including MCC, is currently being conducted (ClinicalTrials.gov. NCT02155647).
  20 in total

Review 1.  Merkel cell carcinoma: critical review with guidelines for multidisciplinary management.

Authors:  Christopher K Bichakjian; Lori Lowe; Christopher D Lao; Howard M Sandler; Carol R Bradford; Timothy M Johnson; Sandra L Wong
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-07-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 2.  Chemotherapy in neuroendocrine/Merkel cell carcinoma of the skin: case series and review of 204 cases.

Authors:  P T Tai; E Yu; E Winquist; A Hammond; L Stitt; J Tonita; J Gilchrist
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Local recurrence in malignant melanoma: long-term results of the multiinstitutional randomized surgical trial.

Authors:  C P Karakousis; C M Balch; M M Urist; M M Ross; T J Smith; A A Bartolucci
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Avelumab in patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma: a multicentre, single-group, open-label, phase 2 trial.

Authors:  Howard L Kaufman; Jeffery Russell; Omid Hamid; Shailender Bhatia; Patrick Terheyden; Sandra P D'Angelo; Kent C Shih; Céleste Lebbé; Gerald P Linette; Michele Milella; Isaac Brownell; Karl D Lewis; Jochen H Lorch; Kevin Chin; Lisa Mahnke; Anja von Heydebreck; Jean-Marie Cuillerot; Paul Nghiem
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 41.316

5.  Merkel cell polyomavirus-specific CD8⁺ and CD4⁺ T-cell responses identified in Merkel cell carcinomas and blood.

Authors:  Jayasri G Iyer; Olga K Afanasiev; Christopher McClurkan; Kelly Paulson; Kotaro Nagase; Lichen Jing; Joshua O Marshak; Lichun Dong; Joseph Carter; Ivy Lai; Erik Farrar; David Byrd; Denise Galloway; Cassian Yee; David M Koelle; Paul Nghiem
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Antibodies to merkel cell polyomavirus T antigen oncoproteins reflect tumor burden in merkel cell carcinoma patients.

Authors:  Kelly G Paulson; Joseph J Carter; Lisa G Johnson; Kevin W Cahill; Jayasri G Iyer; David Schrama; Juergen C Becker; Margaret M Madeleine; Paul Nghiem; Denise A Galloway
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Clonal integration of a polyomavirus in human Merkel cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Huichen Feng; Masahiro Shuda; Yuan Chang; Patrick S Moore
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-01-17       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  PD-1 Blockade with Pembrolizumab in Advanced Merkel-Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Paul T Nghiem; Shailender Bhatia; Evan J Lipson; Ragini R Kudchadkar; Natalie J Miller; Lakshmanan Annamalai; Sneha Berry; Elliot K Chartash; Adil Daud; Steven P Fling; Philip A Friedlander; Harriet M Kluger; Holbrook E Kohrt; Lisa Lundgren; Kim Margolin; Alan Mitchell; Thomas Olencki; Drew M Pardoll; Sunil A Reddy; Erica M Shantha; William H Sharfman; Elad Sharon; Lynn R Shemanski; Michi M Shinohara; Joel C Sunshine; Janis M Taube; John A Thompson; Steven M Townson; Jennifer H Yearley; Suzanne L Topalian; Martin A Cheever
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Improved detection suggests all Merkel cell carcinomas harbor Merkel polyomavirus.

Authors:  Scott J Rodig; Jingwei Cheng; Jacek Wardzala; Andrew DoRosario; Jessica J Scanlon; Alvaro C Laga; Alejandro Martinez-Fernandez; Justine A Barletta; Andrew M Bellizzi; Subhashini Sadasivam; Dustin T Holloway; Dylan J Cooper; Thomas S Kupper; Linda C Wang; James A DeCaprio
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 14.808

10.  Mutational landscape of MCPyV-positive and MCPyV-negative Merkel cell carcinomas with implications for immunotherapy.

Authors:  Gerald Goh; Trent Walradt; Vladimir Markarov; Astrid Blom; Nadeem Riaz; Ryan Doumani; Krista Stafstrom; Ata Moshiri; Lola Yelistratova; Jonathan Levinsohn; Timothy A Chan; Paul Nghiem; Richard P Lifton; Jaehyuk Choi
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-01-19
View more
  17 in total

1.  Novel immune checkpoint blocker to treat Merkel cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Lorenzo Galluzzi; Guido Kroemer
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 8.110

Review 2.  Merkel cell carcinoma: Epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis and therapy.

Authors:  Teresa Amaral; Ulrike Leiter; Claus Garbe
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 6.514

3.  Merkel cell carcinoma masquerading as cellulitis: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  F Safa; M Pant; C Weerasinghe; R Felix; T Terjanian
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 3.677

4.  Biomarker-Driven Prognostication in Merkel Cell Carcinoma: A Paradigm for Personalized Therapy.

Authors:  Beth A Helmink; George Ansstas; Ryan C Fields
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 5.  Identifying Candidates for Immunotherapy among Patients with Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer: A Review of the Potential Predictors of Response.

Authors:  Enrico Zelin; Carlo Alberto Maronese; Arianna Dri; Ludovica Toffoli; Nicola Di Meo; Gianluca Nazzaro; Iris Zalaudek
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-11       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 6.  Update on Merkel Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Michael T Tetzlaff; Priyadharsini Nagarajan
Journal:  Head Neck Pathol       Date:  2018-03-20

Review 7.  Treatment of Advanced Merkel Cell Carcinoma: Current Therapeutic Options and Novel Immunotherapy Approaches.

Authors:  Daniela Femia; Natalie Prinzi; Andrea Anichini; Roberta Mortarini; Federico Nichetti; Francesca Corti; Martina Torchio; Giorgia Peverelli; Filippo Pagani; Andrea Maurichi; Ilaria Mattavelli; Massimo Milione; Nice Bedini; Ambra Corti; Maria Di Bartolomeo; Filippo de Braud; Sara Pusceddu
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 4.493

8.  Merkel Cell Carcinoma, Version 1.2018, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.

Authors:  Christopher K Bichakjian; Thomas Olencki; Sumaira Z Aasi; Murad Alam; James S Andersen; Rachel Blitzblau; Glen M Bowen; Carlo M Contreras; Gregory A Daniels; Roy Decker; Jeffrey M Farma; Kris Fisher; Brian Gastman; Karthik Ghosh; Roy C Grekin; Kenneth Grossman; Alan L Ho; Karl D Lewis; Manisha Loss; Daniel D Lydiatt; Jane Messina; Kishwer S Nehal; Paul Nghiem; Igor Puzanov; Chrysalyne D Schmults; Ashok R Shaha; Valencia Thomas; Yaohui G Xu; John A Zic; Karin G Hoffmann; Anita M Engh
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 12.693

Review 9.  Immunotherapy and Gene Therapy for Oncoviruses Infections: A Review.

Authors:  Nathália Alves Araújo de Almeida; Camilla Rodrigues de Almeida Ribeiro; Jéssica Vasques Raposo; Vanessa Salete de Paula
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-05-02       Impact factor: 5.048

Review 10.  Immune checkpoint inhibitors to treat cutaneous malignancies.

Authors:  Dulce M Barrios; Mytrang H Do; Gregory S Phillips; Michael A Postow; Tomoko Akaike; Paul Nghiem; Mario E Lacouture
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2020-05-24       Impact factor: 11.527

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.