| Literature DB >> 27879872 |
Pavel Ryant1, Eva Dolezelova1, Ivo Fabrik2, Jiri Baloun2, Vojtech Adam2,3, Petr Babula4, Rene Kizek5.
Abstract
In the present paper potato plants were cultivated in the presence of ammonium sulphate or elemental sulphur supplementation into the soil to reveal the effects of different sulphur forms on content of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, calcium, magnesium and sulphur, and yield of tubers. During the investigation of the influence of different sulphur forms on yield of potato tubers we did not observe significant changes. Average weight of tubers of control plants per one experimental pot was 355 g. Application of sulphur in both forms resulted in moderate potato tubers weight reduction per one experimental pot compared to control group; average value ranged from 320 to 350 g per one experimental pot. Further we treated the plants with two different supplementation of sulphur with cadmium(II) ions (4 mg of cadmium(II) acetate per kilogram of the soil). The significantly lowest cadmium content (p < 0.05) was determined in tissues of plants treated with the highest dosage of elemental sulphur (0.64 mg Cd/kg) compared to control plants (0.82 mg Cd/kg). We also aimed our attention on the cadmium content in proteins, lipids or soluble carbohydrates and ash. Application of sulphate as well as elemental sulphur resulted in significant cadmium content reduction in lipid fraction compared to control plants. In addition to this we quantified content of low molecular mass thiols in potatoes tissues. To determine the thiols content we employed differential pulse voltammetry Brdicka reaction. After twelve days of the treatment enhancing of thiols level was observed in all experimental groups regardless to applied sulphur form and its concentration. Finally we evaluated the effect of sulphur supplementation on Phytophora infestans infection of potato plants.Entities:
Keywords: Cadmium; Differential pulse voltammetry Brdicka reaction; Electrochemical methods; Glutathione; Heavy metal; Late blight (Phytophora infestans); Plant; Potato (Solanum tuberosum); Thiols
Year: 2008 PMID: 27879872 PMCID: PMC3675538 DOI: 10.3390/s8053165
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1.Possible scheme of metabolizing of sulphate in a plant.
Scheme of pot experiment.
| Control | Control | 0 | Without application |
| 20 SA | (NH4)2SO4 | 20 | Into soil |
| 40 SA | (NH4)2SO4 | 40 | Into soil |
| 60 SA | (NH4)2SO4 | 60 | Into soil |
| 20 ES | Elemental | 20 | Into soil |
| 40 ES | Elemental | 40 | Into soil |
| 60 ES | Elemental | 60 | Into soil |
Figure 2.Pictures of plants exposed to ammonium sulphate (SA) and elemental sulphur (ES). Numeric data correspond to applied dosage in mg/kg introduced into the soil.
Content of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, calcium, magnesium and sulphur in aerial plant parts (herb).
| Element | Statistical parameter | Control | Form of sulphur application | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ammonium sulphate | Elemental sulphur | |||||||
| 20 SA | 40 SA | 60 SA | 20 ES | 40 ES | 60 ES | |||
|
| ||||||||
| Nitrogen | mean | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| S.D. | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.2 | |
|
| ||||||||
| Phosphorus | mean | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.08 |
| S.D. | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.02 | |
|
| ||||||||
| Potassium | mean | 5.5 | 5.6 | 5.8 | 5.6 | 5.0 | 4.6 | 4.8 |
| S.D. | 0.4 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | |
|
| ||||||||
| Calcium | mean | 3.8 | 4.0 | 11 | 19 | 3.7 | 3.9 | 3.8 |
| S.D. | 0.7 | 0.1 | 1 | 15 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.4 | |
|
| ||||||||
| Magnesium | mean | 0.59 | 0.56 | 0.52 | 0.46 | 0.57 | 0.58 | 0.60 |
| S.D. | 0.08 | 0.05 | 0.09 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.04 | |
|
| ||||||||
| Sulphur | mean | 410 | 550 | 624 | 692 | 613 | 614 | 627 |
| S.D. | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
… standard deviation.
Content of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, calcium, magnesium and sulphur in tubers.
| Element | Statistical parameter | Control | Form of sulphur application | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ammonium sulphate | Elemental sulphur | |||||||
| 20 SA | 40 SA | 60 SA | 20 ES | 40 ES | 60 ES | |||
|
| ||||||||
| Nitrogen | mean | 1.9 | 1.8 | 1.7 | 1.6 | 1.7 | 1.6 | 1.8 |
| S.D. | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.2 | |
|
| ||||||||
| Phosphorus | mean | 0.25 | 0.26 | 0.27 | 0.26 | 0.24 | 0.30 | 0.27 |
| S.D. | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.06 | 0.01 | |
|
| ||||||||
| Potassium | mean | 2.9 | 2.8 | 2.9 | 2.9 | 2.8 | 2.8 | 2.9 |
| S.D. | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | |
|
| ||||||||
| Calcium | mean | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.06 |
| S.D. | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | |
|
| ||||||||
| Magnesium | mean | 0.13 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.14 |
| S.D. | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | |
|
| ||||||||
| Sulphur | mean | 168 | 179 | 174 | 168 | 169 | 164 | 183 |
| S.D. | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
… standard deviation.
Figure 3.Cadmium content in (A) proteins, (B) lipids or (C) saccharides and ash obtained from potato plants treated with elemental sulphur and ammonium sulphate (0, 20, 40 and 60 mg/kg).
Figure 4.Scheme of automated electrochemical detection of thiols.
Figure 5.Electrochemical determination of glutathione by using of automated electrochemical analyzer (sample injection was 10 ml). (A) Typical voltammogram of 100 μM GSH. (B) Dependence of height of Cat2 signal on GSH concentration. (C) Height of Cat2 signal measured after standard GSH additions (90, 180 and 360 μg/ml).
Figure 6.DP voltammograms of plants extracts after (A) ammonium sulphate and (B) elemental sulphur application.
Figure 7.Content of low molecular mass thiols in potato cultivated in the presence of (A) ammonium sulphate or (B) elemental sulphur.
Figure 8.(A) Typical DP voltammograms of extract from potato plants exposed to Phytophora infestans infection. (B) Changes in thiols levels during infection development.