Literature DB >> 27879587

Psychological Outcomes of Labiaplasty: A Prospective Study.

Gemma Sharp1,2, Marika Tiggemann1,2, Julie Mattiske1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although the demand for labiaplasty has increased rapidly over the past decade, little is known about the psychological outcomes of this procedure. In particular, there is a lack of prospective controlled studies to assess the effects of labiaplasty on women's psychological well-being and intimate relationship quality. Nor has research investigated whether preoperative patient characteristics predict satisfaction with surgery.
METHODS: The current study used a prospective controlled design. Participants were 29 adult Australian women who underwent labia minora reduction and 22 comparison women who did not. Both groups completed a baseline questionnaire (preoperatively for the labiaplasty group) and a follow-up questionnaire 6 months later. The questionnaires contained standardized measures of genital appearance satisfaction, relationship satisfaction, sexual confidence, psychological distress, self-esteem, and life satisfaction.
RESULTS: Of the 29 women who underwent labiaplasty, the vast majority reported that they were "moderately" or "extremely" satisfied with the aesthetic (82.8 percent), functional (86.2 percent), and overall (82.8 percent) outcomes. For the standardized measures, the only significant change from baseline to follow-up for the labiaplasty group relative to the comparison group was a reduction in genital appearance dissatisfaction with large effect size (p < 0.001, d = 3.26). Higher levels of psychological distress (p = 0.001) and having a romantic partner (p = 0.016) preoperatively were significantly related to lower satisfaction with surgical outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Labiaplasty appears to have a positive effect on women's genital appearance satisfaction, but not their general psychological well-being or intimate relationship quality. Medical professionals should be mindful of patients with greater psychological distress, as this may compromise satisfaction with surgical outcomes. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, II.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27879587     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002751

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  2 in total

1.  Female genital cosmetic surgery: the good, the bad, and the ugly.

Authors:  Maurizio Serati; Stefano Salvatore; Diaa Rizk
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-07-07       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 2.  The Safe Practice of Female Genital Plastic Surgery.

Authors:  Heather J Furnas; Francisco L Canales; Rachel A Pedreira; Carly Comer; Samuel J Lin; Paul E Banwell
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-07-06
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.