Literature DB >> 27879411

The role of technology in minimally invasive surgery: state of the art, recent developments and future directions.

Michele Tonutti1, Daniel S Elson1, Guang-Zhong Yang1, Ara W Darzi1, Mikael H Sodergren1.   

Abstract

The diffusion of minimally invasive surgery has thrived in recent years, providing substantial benefits over traditional techniques for a number of surgical interventions. This rapid growth has been possible due to significant advancements in medical technology, which partly solved some of the technical and clinical challenges associated with minimally invasive techniques. The issues that still limit its widespread adoption for some applications include the limited field of view; reduced manoeuvrability of the tools; lack of haptic feedback; loss of depth perception; extended learning curve; prolonged operative times and higher financial costs. The present review discusses some of the main recent technological advancements that fuelled the uptake of minimally invasive surgery, focussing especially on the areas of imaging, instrumentation, cameras and robotics. The current limitations of state-of-the-art technology are identified and addressed, proposing future research directions necessary to overcome them. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.

Keywords:  Image-guided surgery; Imaging; Laparoscopy; Minimally-invasive surgery; Surgical robotics

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27879411     DOI: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2016-134311

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Postgrad Med J        ISSN: 0032-5473            Impact factor:   2.401


  7 in total

Review 1.  Latest technology in minimally invasive thoracic surgery.

Authors:  Ivan Chi Hin Siu; Zheng Li; Calvin S H Ng
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-01

2.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery for pediatric tumors: a bicenter experience.

Authors:  P Meignan; Q Ballouhey; J Lejeune; K Braik; B Longis; A R Cook; H Lardy; L Fourcade; Aurélien Binet
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-12-29

3.  Caregiver Perspectives on Patient Participation in Biological Pediatric Cancer Research.

Authors:  Nicole E Kendel; Jennifer A Belsky; Joseph R Stanek; Keri A Streby; Nilay Shah
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-16

4.  Video is better: why aren't we using it? A mixed-methods study of the barriers to routine procedural video recording and case review.

Authors:  Laura Mazer; Oliver Varban; John R Montgomery; Michael M Awad; Allison Schulman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  A Human Gesture Mapping Method to Control a Multi-Functional Hand for Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery: The MUSHA Case.

Authors:  Fanny Ficuciello; Alberto Villani; Tommaso Lisini Baldi; Domenico Prattichizzo
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2021-12-10

6.  Near-infrared fluorescent imaging with indocyanine green in rabbit and patient specimens of esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Jiyun Rho; Yu Hua Quan; Byeong Hyeon Choi; Kook Nam Han; Beop-Min Kim; Young Ho Choi; Hyun Koo Kim
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 7.  Robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: Current evidence.

Authors:  Rana M Alhossaini; Abdulaziz A Altamran; Won Jun Seo; Woo Jin Hyung
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2017-07-28
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.