Literature DB >> 27878700

Performance of native and contrast-enhanced T1 mapping to detect myocardial damage in patients with suspected myocarditis: a head-to-head comparison of different cardiovascular magnetic resonance techniques.

Jonathan Nadjiri1,2, Hanna Nieberler3, Eva Hendrich3, Andreas Greiser4, Albrecht Will3, Stefan Martinoff3, Martin Hadamitzky3.   

Abstract

Myocardial T1 mapping is a novel technique that has proven to be superior to standard imaging for differentiation between healthy individuals in acute myocarditis. Aim of this study was comparison of T1 mapping with a clinical biomarker. We retrospectively investigated 171 patients undergoing cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) examination with suspected myocarditis by performing native and contrast enhanced T1-mapping. Additionally, T2w and T1w images and late gadolinium enhancement sequences (LGE) were utilized for myocardial evaluation; Lake Louise Criteria comprise T1w, T2w and LGE imaging in a score. Reference for positive myocarditis diagnosis was a ten-fold increase of troponin level above normal (0.14 ng/ml). Native T1 and extracellular volume (ECV) showed good association with relevant troponin elevations. Area under the curve (AUC) was 81% (p = 0.0001) for native T1 with an optimal threshold of 979 ms and 86% (p < 0.0001) for ECV with an optimal cutoff of 32.4%. AUC for T2w imaging (T2-signal intensity ratio to skeletal muscle) was 77% (p = 0.0003). AUC for T2w imaging (T2-signal intensity compared to remote myocardium) was 69% (p = 0.012). Additionally, we found positive correlation for native T1 and ECV with the Lake Louise Criteria (r = 0.44, p = 0.0001 for native T1 and r = 0.45, p = 0.0001 for ECV). Correlated to troponin as biomarker, ECV and native T1 mapping perform at least equally well in comparison to established CMR-techniques LGE, T2w imaging and the combined Lake Louise Criteria in detecting acute myocardial damage. Normal ECV values rule out myocardial damage with very high certainty. T1 mapping qualifies for further prospective evaluations to evolve as a separate biomarker.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging; Extracellular volume; Myocardial damage; Myocarditis; T1 mapping

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27878700     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-016-1029-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  26 in total

1.  Molecular imaging: T2-weighted CMR of the area at risk--a risky business?

Authors:  W Benjamin Wince; Raymond J Kim
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 32.419

2.  Extracellular volume imaging by magnetic resonance imaging provides insights into overt and sub-clinical myocardial pathology.

Authors:  Martin Ugander; Abiola J Oki; Li-Yueh Hsu; Peter Kellman; Andreas Greiser; Anthony H Aletras; Christopher T Sibley; Marcus Y Chen; W Patricia Bandettini; Andrew E Arai
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 29.983

3.  A closer look on the battlefield: the salvaged area at risk as an outcome marker for myocardial reperfusion.

Authors:  Matthias G Friedrich
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-05

4.  The assessment of area at risk and myocardial salvage after coronary revascularization in acute myocardial infarction: comparison between CMR and SPECT.

Authors:  Martin Hadamitzky; Birgit Langhans; Jörg Hausleiter; Carolin Sonne; Adnan Kastrati; Stefan Martinoff; Albert Schömig; Tareq Ibrahim
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-03

Review 5.  Clinical and experimental studies in myocarditis.

Authors:  C Kishimoto; Y Hiraoka
Journal:  Curr Opin Cardiol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 2.161

6.  Comprehensive Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Suspected Myocarditis: The MyoRacer-Trial.

Authors:  Philipp Lurz; Christian Luecke; Ingo Eitel; Felix Föhrenbach; Clara Frank; Matthias Grothoff; Suzanne de Waha; Karl-Philipp Rommel; Julia Anna Lurz; Karin Klingel; Reinhard Kandolf; Gerhard Schuler; Holger Thiele; Matthias Gutberlet
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  T2-prepared SSFP improves diagnostic confidence in edema imaging in acute myocardial infarction compared to turbo spin echo.

Authors:  Peter Kellman; Anthony H Aletras; Christine Mancini; Elliot R McVeigh; Andrew E Arai
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 8.  Acute viral myocarditis: current concepts in diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Ayelet Shauer; Israel Gotsman; Andre Keren; Donna R Zwas; Yaron Hellman; Ronen Durst; Dan Admon
Journal:  Isr Med Assoc J       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 0.892

9.  Interpreting cardiac troponin results from high-sensitivity assays in chronic kidney disease without acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Christopher deFilippi; Stephen L Seliger; Walter Kelley; Show-Hong Duh; Michael Hise; Robert H Christenson; Myles Wolf; Hanna Gaggin; James Januzzi
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 8.327

10.  Assessment of intramyocardial hemorrhage by T1-weighted cardiovascular magnetic resonance in reperfused acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Steen Fjord Pedersen; Samuel A Thrysøe; Michael P Robich; William P Paaske; Steffen Ringgaard; Hans Erik Bøtker; Esben S S Hansen; Won Yong Kim
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 5.364

View more
  4 in total

1.  Diagnostic Performance of Extracellular Volume, Native T1, and T2 Mapping Versus Lake Louise Criteria by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance for Detection of Acute Myocarditis: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jonathan A Pan; Yoo Jin Lee; Michael Salerno
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 7.792

2.  Cardiovascular imaging 2017 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Johan H C Reiber; Amer Alaiti; Hiram G Bezerra; Johan De Sutter; Paul Schoenhagen; Arthur E Stillman; Nico R L Van de Veire
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 3.  T1 mapping in cardiac MRI.

Authors:  Dina Radenkovic; Sebastian Weingärtner; Lewis Ricketts; James C Moon; Gabriella Captur
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 4.  Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Myocarditis.

Authors:  Christian L Polte; Emanuele Bobbio; Entela Bollano; Niklas Bergh; Christina Polte; Jakob Himmelman; Kerstin M Lagerstrand; Sinsia A Gao
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-03
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.