Literature DB >> 27878675

Supplementing gatekeeping with a revenue scheme for secondary care providers.

Tor Iversen1, Anastasia Mokienko2.   

Abstract

We study implications of a change in the payment scheme for radiology providers in Norway that was implemented in 2008. The change implies reduced fee-for-service and increased fixed budget for a contracted volume of services. A consequence of the change is that private providers have less incentive to conduct examinations beyond the contracted volume. Different from the situation observed before the change in 2008, the volume is no longer determined by the demand side, and a rationing of the supply occurs. We employ data on radiological examinations initiated by GPs' referrals. We apply monthly data at the physician-practice level for 2007-2010. The data set is unique because it includes information about all GPs in the Norwegian patient-list system. The results indicate that private providers conducted fewer examinations in 2008-2010 compared with previous periods and that public hospitals did either the same volume or more. We find that GPs who operate in a more competitive environment experienced a greater reduction in magnetic resonance imaging, both performed by private providers and in total for their patients. We argue that this result supports a hypothesis that patients with lower expected benefits are rationed. Hence, rationing from the supply side might supplement GP gatekeeping.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fee-for-service; Gatekeeping; Physician; Profit motive; Radiology; Referral

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27878675     DOI: 10.1007/s10754-016-9188-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Health Econ Manag        ISSN: 2199-9031


  13 in total

1.  Market conditions and general practitioners' referrals.

Authors:  Tor Iversen; Ching-to Albert Ma
Journal:  Int J Health Care Finance Econ       Date:  2011-10-19

2.  Gatekeeping in health care.

Authors:  Kurt R Brekke; Robert Nuscheler; Odd Rune Straume
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2006-08-04       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Service production and contract choice in primary physician services.

Authors:  Rune J Sørensen; Jostein Grytten
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.980

4.  Treatment and referral decisions under different physician payment mechanisms.

Authors:  Marie Allard; Izabela Jelovac; Pierre Thomas Léger
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 3.883

5.  Physician provider type influences utilization and diagnostic utility of magnetic resonance imaging of the knee.

Authors:  James D Wylie; Julia R Crim; Zachary M Working; Robert L Schmidt; Robert T Burks
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Patient switching in general practice.

Authors:  Tor Iversen; Hilde Lurås
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 3.883

7.  The demand for elective surgery in a public system: time and money prices in the UK National Health Service.

Authors:  Hugh Gravelle; Mark Dusheiko; Matthew Sutton
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.883

8.  What causes increasing and unnecessary use of radiological investigations? A survey of radiologists' perceptions.

Authors:  Kristin B Lysdahl; Bjørn M Hofmann
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Influence of magnetic resonance of the knee on GPs' decisions: a randomised trial.

Authors:  Stephen D Brealey
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.386

10.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee in Norway 2002-2004 (national survey): rapid increase, older patients, large geographic differences.

Authors:  Ansgar Espeland; Nils L Natvig; Ingard Løge; Lars Engebretsen; Jostein Ellingsen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-07-22       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.