Literature DB >> 27878467

Outcomes of retesting BRCA negative patients using multigene panels.

Siddhartha Yadav1,2, Ashley Reeves3, Sarah Campian3, Amy Paine3, Dana Zakalik3,4.   

Abstract

The utility of multigene panels in retesting patients who previously tested negative for a pathogenic mutation by BRCA1/2 testing is not well established. Patients who previously tested negative for a pathogenic BRCA1/2 mutation by standard sequencing, and who were seen in cancer genetics center between November 1, 2012 and June 30, 2015 for additional testing utilizing multigene panels, were identified using our genetic testing registry. Data on demographics, personal and family history of cancer, results of panel testing and the impact on patient management was collected retrospectively. A total of 122 patients underwent retesting during the study period. Thirteen (11%) pathogenic mutations were identified in the following genes: CHEK2(4), PALB2(3), ATM(2), CDH1, APC, BARD1 and MRE11A. Eleven out of these thirteen mutations were deemed actionable based on published guidelines. Of these eleven, seven patients had an actual change in clinical management as a result of retesting. Furthermore, retesting also led to a change in clinical management in the two patients with mutations in genes (BARD1 and MRE11A) which do not have clear guidelines for management. There were no significant differences in demographics and personal and family history of cancer between patients who tested positive and those who tested negative on retesting. This study demonstrates the clinical utility of multigene panels in a group of high risk individuals who previously tested negative for a BRCA1/2 mutation. This retesting approach revealed a pathogenic mutation in 11% of cases. Retesting led to significant change in clinical management in a majority of patients with actionable mutations (7 out of 11), as well as in those with mutations in genes which do not have specific management guidelines.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Actionability; BRCA negative; Clinical impact; Multigene panel; Outcomes; Retesting

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27878467     DOI: 10.1007/s10689-016-9956-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Cancer        ISSN: 1389-9600            Impact factor:   2.375


  37 in total

1.  Usefulness of Multigene Testing: Catching the Train That's Left the Station.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Swisher
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 31.777

2.  Multiplex genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: out on the high wire without a net?

Authors:  Susan M Domchek; Angela Bradbury; Judy E Garber; Kenneth Offit; Mark E Robson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Multigene panel testing: planning the next generation of research studies in clinical cancer genetics.

Authors:  Mark Robson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Next-generation sequencing for the diagnosis of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer using genomic capture targeting multiple candidate genes.

Authors:  Laurent Castéra; Sophie Krieger; Antoine Rousselin; Angélina Legros; Jean-Jacques Baumann; Olivia Bruet; Baptiste Brault; Robin Fouillet; Nicolas Goardon; Olivier Letac; Stéphanie Baert-Desurmont; Julie Tinat; Odile Bera; Catherine Dugast; Pascaline Berthet; Florence Polycarpe; Valérie Layet; Agnes Hardouin; Thierry Frébourg; Dominique Vaur
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 4.246

5.  Gene-panel sequencing and the prediction of breast-cancer risk.

Authors:  Douglas F Easton; Paul D P Pharoah; Antonis C Antoniou; Marc Tischkowitz; Sean V Tavtigian; Katherine L Nathanson; Peter Devilee; Alfons Meindl; Fergus J Couch; Melissa Southey; David E Goldgar; D Gareth R Evans; Georgia Chenevix-Trench; Nazneen Rahman; Mark Robson; Susan M Domchek; William D Foulkes
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 6.  The DNA damage response and cancer therapy.

Authors:  Christopher J Lord; Alan Ashworth
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Multigene panel analysis identified germline mutations of DNA repair genes in breast and ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Yosuke Hirotsu; Hiroshi Nakagomi; Ikuko Sakamoto; Kenji Amemiya; Toshio Oyama; Hitoshi Mochizuki; Masao Omata
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 2.183

8.  Utilization of multigene panels in hereditary cancer predisposition testing: analysis of more than 2,000 patients.

Authors:  Holly LaDuca; A J Stuenkel; Jill S Dolinsky; Steven Keiles; Stephany Tandy; Tina Pesaran; Elaine Chen; Chia-Ling Gau; Erika Palmaer; Kamelia Shoaepour; Divya Shah; Virginia Speare; Stephanie Gandomi; Elizabeth Chao
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Sequence variant classification and reporting: recommendations for improving the interpretation of cancer susceptibility genetic test results.

Authors:  Sharon E Plon; Diana M Eccles; Douglas Easton; William D Foulkes; Maurizio Genuardi; Marc S Greenblatt; Frans B L Hogervorst; Nicoline Hoogerbrugge; Amanda B Spurdle; Sean V Tavtigian
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.878

10.  The next controversy in genetic testing: clinical data as trade secrets?

Authors:  Robert Cook-Deegan; John M Conley; James P Evans; Daniel Vorhaus
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 4.246

View more
  8 in total

1.  Lower gastrointestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms associated with hereditary cancer syndromes: a case series.

Authors:  Trilokesh D Kidambi; Christina Pedley; Amie Blanco; Emily K Bergsland; Jonathan P Terdiman
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.375

2.  Outcomes of retesting in patients with previously uninformative cancer genetics evaluations.

Authors:  Shenin A Dettwyler; Erika S Koeppe; Michelle F Jacobs; Elena M Stoffel
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 2.446

3.  Multigene Panel Testing in Turkish Hereditary Cancer Syndrome Patients.

Authors:  Esra Arslan Ates; Ayberk Turkyilmaz; Ceren Alavanda; Ozlem Yildirim; Ahmet Ilter Guney
Journal:  Medeni Med J       Date:  2022-06-23

4.  Germline Testing in a Cohort of Patients at High Risk of Hereditary Cancer Predisposition Syndromes: First Two-Year Results from South Italy.

Authors:  Francesco Paduano; Emma Colao; Fernanda Fabiani; Valentina Rocca; Francesca Dinatolo; Adele Dattola; Lucia D'Antona; Rosario Amato; Francesco Trapasso; Francesco Baudi; Nicola Perrotti; Rodolfo Iuliano
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 4.141

5.  Impact of changing guidelines on genetic testing and surveillance recommendations in a contemporary cohort of breast cancer survivors with family history of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Annie Wang; Jessica N Everett; Jennifer Chun; Cindy Cen; Diane M Simeone; Freya Schnabel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Identification of genetic variants for clinical management of familial colorectal tumors.

Authors:  Mev Dominguez-Valentin; Sigve Nakken; Hélène Tubeuf; Daniel Vodak; Per Olaf Ekstrøm; Anke M Nissen; Monika Morak; Elke Holinski-Feder; Alexandra Martins; Pål Møller; Eivind Hovig
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 2.103

7.  Summary of BARD1 Mutations and Precise Estimation of Breast and Ovarian Cancer Risks Associated with the Mutations.

Authors:  Malwina Suszynska; Piotr Kozlowski
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 4.096

8.  Identifying sequence variants contributing to hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 negative breast and ovarian cancer patients.

Authors:  Elisabeth Jarhelle; Hilde Monica Frostad Riise Stensland; Geir Åsmund Myge Hansen; Siri Skarsfjord; Christoffer Jonsrud; Monica Ingebrigtsen; Nina Strømsvik; Marijke Van Ghelue
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.