Dong-Mei Wang1, Guang-Chuan Wang2, Jing Yang3, Nicolas P Plotnikoff4, Noreen Griffin4, Yu-Man Han1, Rui-Qun Qi5, Xing-Hua Gao5, Feng-Ping Shan1. 1. Department of Immunology, School of Basic Medical Science, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning 110122, P.R. China. 2. Department of Immunology, School of Basic Medical Science, Liaoning Medical University, Jinzhou, Liaoning 121000, P.R. China. 3. Department of Pathology, School of Basic Medical Science, Liaoning Medical University, Jinzhou, Liaoning 121000, P.R. China. 4. Immune Therapeutics, Inc., Orlando, FL 32801, USA. 5. Department of Dermatology, No. 1 Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning 110001, P.R. China.
Abstract
Melanoma is an aggressive cancer, the incidence of which is increasing worldwide. Limited therapies are currently available, particularly following metastasis. The aim of the present study was to investigate the inhibiting effect of methionine enkephalin (MENK) on human melanoma via opioid receptors. The results of the present study revealed that MENK markedly regulates the proliferation of A375 cells, causing cell cycle arrest in G0/G1 phase and a decrease in the percentage of cells in S and G2/M phases. Reverse transcription‑quantitative polymerase chain reaction demonstrated that MENK treatment increased opioid receptor expression in A375 cells. Furthermore, the expression level of survivin, an inhibitory apoptotic protein, was 1.1% of the level in the control group in the MENK group following 48 h of treatment. In conclusion, the results of the present study revealed, to the best of our knowledge for the first time, that MENK may inhibit growth and induce apoptosis of A375 cells, and describes a potential mechanism underlying these effects. Therefore, MENK should be investigated as a primary therapy for human melanoma cancer and as an adjuvant to other chemotherapies. Further studies are required to develop an optimal strategy for the use of MENK for the treatment of human cancers.
Melanoma is an aggressive cancer, the incidence of which is increasing worldwide. Limited therapies are currently available, particularly following metastasis. The aim of the present study was to investigate the inhibiting effect of methionineenkephalin (MENK) on humanmelanoma via opioid receptors. The results of the present study revealed that MENK markedly regulates the proliferation of A375 cells, causing cell cycle arrest in G0/G1 phase and a decrease in the percentage of cells in S and G2/M phases. Reverse transcription‑quantitative polymerase chain reaction demonstrated that MENK treatment increased opioid receptor expression in A375 cells. Furthermore, the expression level of survivin, an inhibitory apoptotic protein, was 1.1% of the level in the control group in the MENK group following 48 h of treatment. In conclusion, the results of the present study revealed, to the best of our knowledge for the first time, that MENK may inhibit growth and induce apoptosis of A375 cells, and describes a potential mechanism underlying these effects. Therefore, MENK should be investigated as a primary therapy for humanmelanoma cancer and as an adjuvant to other chemotherapies. Further studies are required to develop an optimal strategy for the use of MENK for the treatment of humancancers.
Humanmelanoma is the most malignant skin cancer (1) and its incidence has risen rapidly in recent years. It is the most common skin cancer in females aged 25–29 (2). The median survival for patients with metastatic melanoma is ~7 months (3,4); surgery is currently the primary treatment. Drug resistance is a common problem associated with anticancer drugs (5,6). Natural products and medicines have been developed as cosmeceutical ingredients to treat esthetic skin problems, including skin darkening and wrinkles (7–10). Therefore, it may be beneficial to develop natural therapeutic agents for the treatment of melanoma.Methionineenkephalin (MENK), an endogenous opioid neuropentapeptide composed of Tyr-Ala-Ala-Phe-Met, is derived from pre-enkephalin and circulates in the blood at low concentrations. Various types of opioid receptors have been described and two of the most studied are µ (MOR) and δ (DOR) (11,12). These receptors are expressed on the surface of immune cells and various tumor cells, including pancreatic cancer and melanoma cells (13,14). MENK upregulates the activity of immune cells and may inhibit tumor growth (15,16). MENK and opioid receptors form a biological axis that regulates cell proliferation by delaying G1/S cell cycle progression under homeostatic conditions and in neoplasia, and inhibits pancreatic tumor progression (17). However, the molecular mechanism underlying this effect remains unclear. The present study aimed to investigate the mechanism underlying the therapeutic effect of MENK on melanoma, to determine whether MENK may be a potential therapeutic strategy for the treatment of cancer and other conditions in which the immune system is suppressed.
Materials and methods
Cell culture
A375humanmelanoma cells were provided by No. 1 Hospital, China Medical University (Shenyang, China), and cultured in RPMI 1640 (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA), supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS; Biological Industries, Kibbutz Beit Haemek, Israel), 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 µg/ml streptomycin. Cells were cultured at 37°C and 5% CO2, and cells in the exponential phase of growth were used for subsequent experiments.
Reagents
MENK (≥97% purity) was provided by Penta Biotech, Inc. (Union City, CA, USA). Reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) kits were purchased from Takara Bio, Inc. (Otsu, Japan). TRIzol® was obtained from Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. Propidium iodide (PI), dimethylsulfoxide and thymidine were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich; Merck Millipore (Darmstadt, Germany).
Cell culture and MENK administration in vitro
A375 cells were treated with various concentrations of MENK (0, 2.5, 5, 10 and 12.5 mg/ml in RPMI 1640) for various times (24, 48, 72 and 96 h). Cell viability was evaluated by MTS assays and flow cytometry.Morphologic observation of A375 cells. Cells were treated with 12.5 mg/ml MENK for 48 h and alterations in morphology were observed under a conventional light microscope.
Cell growth and cell cycle analysis
A375 cells were collected as target cells and seeded into 96-well plates (3×103/well). The A375 proliferation in each well was determined 3 h following plating by measuring the optical density at 570 nm using a bichromatic microplate reader.A375 cells were seeded in 6-well plates for 48 h (5×105/well). The cells were trypsinized, washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and fixed in 70% ethanol. Prior to flow cytometric analysis, fixed cells were stained with 0.5 mg/ml PI in PBS containing 50 mg/ml RNase A. Cells were acquired on a flow cytometer and the data was analyzed using ModiFit LT™ software version 4.0 (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA).
RT-qPCR analysis of MENK-associated opioid receptors
The mRNA expression levels of MOR, DOR and κ-opioid receptors (KOR) were detected by RT-qPCR. A375 cells (3×106/well) were divided into 3 groups: MENK (12.5 mg/ml), MENK with naltrexone (NTX; 1 mg/ml; Penta Biotech, Inc., Union City, CA, USA) and control. Cells were cultured for 48 h. Total RNA was extracted from cells of the 3 groups using TRIzol, and cDNA was synthesized using reverse transcriptase. Aliquots of cDNA were used as the template for qPCR reactions containing primers for MOR, DOR, KOR or β-actin. The primers were synthesized by Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. and had the following oligo-nucleotide sequences: Forward, 5′-TGCTCCTGGCTCAACTTGTCC-3′ and reverse, 5′-GCGTGCTAGTGGCTAAGGCATCTG-3′ for MOR; forward, 5′-CCATCCACATCTTCGTCATCGTCTG-3′ and reverse, 5′-TCGTCCAGGAAGGCGTAGAGAAC-3′ for DOR; forward, 5′-TCTCCCAGTGCTTGCCTTCTCC-3′ and reverse, 5′-TTGCGGTCTTCATCTTCGTGTATCG-3′ for KOR; and forward, 5′-TTCCAGCGTTCCTTCTTGGGTAT-3′ and reverse, 5′-GTTGGCATAGAGGTGTTTACGG-3′ for β-actin. The qPCR reactions were performed using an Applied Biosystems 7500 Real-Time PCR System (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) and SYBR® Premix EX Taq II. The cycling conditions were as follows: An initial denaturation step at 95°C for 2 min, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 15 sec and annealing at 60°C for 1 min. Data were normalized to β-actin using the 2−ΔΔCq method (18).
Apoptosis analysis
Apoptosis was assessed by labeling A375 cells with Annexin V-fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) and PI (BD Biosciences) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The samples were acquired on a FACSCalibur flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) and analyzed with ModiFit LT software version 4.0 or WinMDI version 2.9 (The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA).
Apoptosis antibody assay
A375 cells (1×107) were seeded into plates and the assay was performed using a RayBio® Human Apoptosis Antibody array (RayBiotech, Inc., Norcross, GA, USA) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Signals were imaged using an Axon Genepix® microarray scanner (Molecular Devices, LLC, Sunnyvale, CA, USA).
Transwell invasion assay
The invasive ability of cells was determined by transwell assay. Briefly, the 8-µm pore polycarbonate filters were coated with extracellular matrix (50 µg/filter; Sigma-Aldrich; Merck Millipore); 500 µl (2×105) cells were added to the upper chamber and 500 µl RPMI 1640 with 10% FCS was pipetted into the lower chamber. The non-invasive cells in the upper chamber were gently wiped off 12 h later. The cells that penetrated to the lower chamber were stained with crystal violet, imaged and counted. Each experiment was performed in triplicate.
Statistical analysis
All experiments were performed in triplicate at least. Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. Statistical analyses were performed SPSS software version 13.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Groups were compared using one-way analyses of variance followed by the Student-Newman-Keuls post hoc test. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Results
Morphological alterations in A375 cells
Following culture with 12.5 mg/ml MENK for 48 h the A375 cells exhibited typical apoptotic morphology with long protrusions and extensions. A375 cells exhibited disintegration and apoptotic bodies as presented in Fig. 1.
Figure 1.
Morphology of A375 cells. (A) A375 cells cultured in RMPI 1640 only. (B) A375 cells treated with 12.5 mg/ml MENK for 48 h. Following MENK treatment, cells exhibited oval or irregularly shaped nuclei, with long protrusions and a reduction in cell number. Magnification, ×200. MENK, methionine encephalin.
MENK inhibits A375 cell proliferation
The viability of A375 cells treated with MENK was reduced in a dose- and time-dependent manner. At 12.5 mg/ml MENK, the rate of cell growth inhibition reached a plateau; the rate of inhibition was 57.64 and 63.8% at 72 and 96 h, respectively, compared with the control group (P<0.001; Fig. 2A).
Figure 2.
MENK inhibits A375 growth by cell cycle arrest. (A) The inhibition rate of A375 cells treated with 0, 2.5, 5, 10 or 12.5 mg/ml MENK for 24, 48, 72 and 96 h was evaluated by an MTS assay. The inhibition rate in the 12.5 mg/ml MENK group was significantly increased compared with control cultures receiving RPMI 1640. *P<0.05 and **P<0.01 vs. RPMI 1640. (B) The cell cycle of A375 cells treated with 0, 2.5, 10 or 12.5 mg/ml MENK for 48 h was analyzed by flow cytometry. (C) The percentage of 10 mg/ml MENK-treated cells in G0/G1 was significantly elevated compared with control. **P<0.01 vs. RPMI 1640. Mean percentage of cells in G0/G1, S, and G2/M phases are presented. MENK, methionine encephalin.
MENK induces cell cycle arrest
The effect of MENK on cell cycle distribution was analyzed by flow cytometry (Fig. 2B). The percentage of the 10 mg/ml MENK group in G0/G1 phase was 69.41% compared with 57.14% of the control cells (P=0.015). Correspondingly, the number of 10 mg/ml MENK group cells in S phase decreased to 14.8% compared to 29.52% of control cells (P=0.004). The percentage of cells subjected to 10 mg/ml MENK treatment in G2/M phase was 15.79% compared with 13.34% of control cells (P=0.24; Fig. 2C).
MENK increases mRNA expression levels of opioid receptors on A375 cells
Following treatment with 12.5 mg/ml MENK, mRNA expression levels of MOR, DOR and KOR on A375 cells were determined by RT-qPCR (Fig. 3). mRNA expression levels of DOR, MOR and KOR were 6.68, 5.46 and 2.81, respectively, compared with 1 in the control group. These differences reached significance for DOR (P<0.001) and MOR (P=0.001). This increased expression of all 3 ORs was attenuated by NTX (P=0.004).
Figure 3.
mRNA expression levels of DOR, MOR and KOR in A375 cells. mRNA expression levels were detected using reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction following treatment with RPMI 1640 only, MENK or MENK + NTX in vitro for 48 h. β-actin served as an internal reference. MENK upregulated the mRNA expression levels of DOR, MOR and KOR in A375 cells. DOR and MOR were significantly upregulated following MENK treatment compared with the RPMI 1640 group. The increased expression was attenuated by NTX. *P<0.05 and **P<0.01 vs. RPMI 1640. DOR, δ-opioid receptors; MOR, µ-opioid receptors; KOR, κ-opioid receptors; MENK, methionine encephalin; NTX, naltrexone.
MENK induces apoptosis in vitro
Following MENK treatment of A375 cells, decreased viability was accompanied by alterations in cell morphology, including the appearance of blebs and cell disintegration into apoptotic bodies. This was confirmed by annexin V/PI staining; there was a significant dose-dependent increase in annexin V+/PI− apoptotic cells following MENK treatment, compared with control cells (Fig. 4). Apoptosis appeared to peak at 48 h. The rate of apoptosis increased from 4.22% in the control group to 25.1% in the 12.5 mg/ml MENK treatment group (P=0.001).
Figure 4.
MENK induces apoptosis in A375 cells. (A) Annexin V/PI staining of A375 cells was performed following treatment with 0, 2.5, 5, 10 or 12.5 mg/ml MENK for 12, 24, 48 or 72 h. Apoptotic cells were defined as annexin V+/PI−. Experiments were performed 3 times with similar results and one representative experiment is presented. (B) The rate of apoptosis increased from 4.22% in the control group to 25.1% in the 12.5 mg/ml MENK treatment group. *P<0.05 and **P<0.01 vs. RPMI 1640. MENK, methionine encephalin; PI, propidium iodide.
Assay of human apoptosis mediators
Various factors have been described to be responsible for the induction of apoptosis. The expression of 47 genes was analyzed in A375 cells following 12, 24 or 48 h exposure to 0 or 12.5 mg/ml MENK (Fig. 5A and B). Analysis revealed that the expression of apoptosis inducer proteins was elevated and apoptosis inhibitor proteins declined in MENK-treated cells compared with controls. The expression of survivin and X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis (XIAP) was 1.1 and 3.4%, respectively, in the MENK group compared with control at 48 h (P<0.001; Fig. 5C).
Figure 5.
Apoptotic protein analysis. Analysis of 43 apoptotic factors in A375 cells was performed following treatment with 12.5 mg/ml MENK for 12, 24 or 48 h. (A) The position of each apoptotic factor. (B) Proteins bound to antibody spots in the MENK treatment and control groups. (C) Quantification of the data at 48 h. The rate of signal value between MENK and control groups. MENK, methionine encephalin; TRAILR-2, tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand receptor 2; IGFBP, insulin-like growth factor-binding protein; XIAP, X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis.
MENK inhibits cell invasion
The invasion capacity of A375 cells was determined using a transwell assay. The number of cells that invaded through the membrane decreased significantly by 10.5% in the 5 mg/ml MENK group (P=0.026) and 28.3% in 12.5 mg/ml MENK group (P<0.001) compared with the control group (Table I).
MENK, an endogenous neuropeptide, may contribute to immune responses against tumors and viral infections by activating multiple types of immune cells, enabling them to secrete various cytokines or directly kill target cells (19,20). Previous studies have provided evidence for the direct modulation of the immune system via opioid receptors (21,22). Investigations into MENK have revealed that the nuclear membrane of certain cancer cells expressed receptors to which MENK bound, resulting in marked growth inhibition of cancer cells in vitro (23–28).The present study investigated the detailed mechanisms underlying the effects of MENK on humanmelanomaA375 cell growth. The results of the present study revealed that the concentration of MENK that achieved optimal inhibition of A375 cell growth, of those assessed, was 12.5 mg/ml. In addition, the mRNA expression levels of DOR, MOR and KOR in A375 cells increased following MENK treatment; DOR and MOR were predominant. This increased expression was attenuated by NTX. Furthermore, MENK induced apoptosis of A375 cells and inhibited invasion.The inhibitory effects of MENK on cell replication were first described in developing rat brain (29) and in tissue culture studies on mouse and humanneuroblastoma (30). MENK inhibits DNA synthesis and replication of healthy cells and tissues (31), humanneoplasia and bacteria. The activity of MENK is receptor-mediated, dose- and time-dependent, and reversible. This neuropeptide is present in developing and regenerating tissues, and has been identified in embryonic tissues and numerous human cancers (32). Exogenous MENK inhibited progression and growth of a tumor overexpressing opioid receptors (33).The present study demonstrated that MENK inhibited proliferation and induced apoptosis in A375humanmelanoma cells for, to the best of our knowledge, the first time. Cells exhibited growth inhibition following exposure to MENK and MENK arrested cell cycle progression in G0-G1 phase. The action of MENK may therefore be closely associated with another key regulator of the G1-S phase transition, the tumor suppressor retinoblastoma protein. The effect of MENK on the cell cycle may be associated with opioid receptors; this is consistent with the study by Zagon et al (17), indicating the specific and singular receptor for MENK action on the replication of a humanpancreatic cancer cell line is MOR.MENK significantly increased apoptosis in A375 cells; XIAP and survivin were differentially expressed between control and MENK-treated groups. XIAP and survivin are members of the inhibitor of apoptosis (IAP) family, which are the most powerful apoptosis inhibitors currently identified. Survivin is important for the regulation of cell mitosis and apoptosis and is a dual-function protein, affecting the mitotic apparatus assembly and cytokinesis time, and regulating apoptosis through phosphorylation. Survivin is a mediator of apoptosis resistance and cell cycle progression, and is highly expressed in cancer. A previous study have revealed that survivin is upregulated in melanoma compared with healthy melanocytes, and is required for melanoma cell viability (34). A previous study in melanoma cell lines and animal models have implicated survivin as an important molecule in melanoma pathogenesis (35). Its clinical relevance in this disease is underscored by studies demonstrating a correlation between survivin expression and poor outcome in patients (36,37). The role of p53 in tumor suppression has been well characterized, acting in a gene-specific manner as a transcriptional activator (for pro-apoptotic genes including bax) or repressor (for various oncogenes including c-myc) (38). Induction of wild type p53 by DNA-damaging agents, including UV light and doxorubicin, or introduction of exogenous p53 (39), downregulated survivin expression in malignant cells. In the present study, the expression of survivin was 0.011-fold in the MENK group compared with the control group at 48 h, suggesting that MENK may induce apoptosis by inhibiting survivin expression.In conclusion, the results of the present study revealed, to the best of our knowledge for the first time, that MENK may inhibit growth and induce apoptosis of A375 cells, and describes a potential mechanism underlying these effects. MENK is readily degraded, without alteration of cell migration, differentiation or survival and thus may be considered a biotherapeutic agent. Clinically, MENK is safe, non-toxic and extends survival and reduces tumor burden in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer (40). Therefore, MENK should be investigated as a primary therapy for humanmelanoma cancer and as an adjuvant to other chemotherapies. Further studies are required to develop an optimal strategy for the use of MENK in the treatment of humancancers.
Authors: I S Zagon; C D Roesener; M F Verderame; B M Ohlsson-Wilhelm; R J Levin; P J McLaughlin Journal: Int J Oncol Date: 2000-11 Impact factor: 5.650
Authors: Jill P Smith; Sandra I Bingaman; David T Mauger; Harold H Harvey; Laurence M Demers; Ian S Zagon Journal: Open Access J Clin Trials Date: 2010-03-01
Authors: Eleni Linos; Susan M Swetter; Myles G Cockburn; Graham A Colditz; Christina A Clarke Journal: J Invest Dermatol Date: 2009-01-08 Impact factor: 8.551