Literature DB >> 27878063

Retrospective Study of Punch Scoring Versus Freehand Approach for First Stage Mohs Micrographic Surgery.

Nikoo Cheraghi1, Abdulhadi Jfri2, Robert Bacigalupi2, Hooman Khorasani2.   

Abstract

Objective: The objective was to observe whether there is a difference in the number of subjects requiring more than one stage of Mohs micrographic surgery for small lesion nonmelanoma skin cancers using the punch scoring method versus freehand approach. Design: Retrospective review. Setting: Outpatient Mohs Clinic. Participants: Thirty patients with small lesion (<5mm) basal cell and squamous cell carcinoma who had Mohs micrographic surgery using either the punch scoring method (15) for scoring the first layer or the freehand method (15). Measurements: Differences between the two groups were evaluated by the number of subjects requiring more than one stage and the reason for any additional stages.
Results: There was no observed difference in the number of subjects requiring more than one Mohs stage between the punch scoring group and the freehand group.
Conclusion: Dermatologic surgeons can use the punch scoring method or the freehand approach for scoring small lesion Mohs based on provider preference.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 27878063      PMCID: PMC5110330     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol        ISSN: 1941-2789


  2 in total

1.  Residual skin cancer after preoperative biopsy: evaluation by Mohs micrographic surgery.

Authors:  Joseph Alcalay; Ronen Alkalay; Bilha Hazaz
Journal:  Int J Dermatol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.736

2.  'Scoring with a punch': facilitating Mohs surgery around small biopsy scars.

Authors:  A Kapadia; W Hussain
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 9.302

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.