INTRODUCTION: We sought to understand the contemporary pharmacologic management of overactive bladder (OAB) in a single-payer system. We examined temporal trends in the use of anticholinergic medications and assessed whether the likelihood of patients changing their anticholinergic therapy was predicted by their current therapy. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, population-based analysis of prescription records from the PharmaNet database in BC, Canada. We identified patients treated with one or more anticholinergic prescriptions between 2001 and 2009. We characterized temporal trends in the use of anticholinergic medications. We used generalized estimating equations with a logit wing to assess the relationship between the type of anticholinergic medication and the change in prescription. RESULTS: The 114 325 included patients filled 1 140 296 anti-cholinergic prescriptions. The number of prescriptions each year increased over the study, both in aggregate and for each individual medication. While oxybutynin was the most commonly prescribed medication (68% of all prescriptions), the proportion of newer anticholinergics (solifenacin, darifenacin, and trospium) prescribed increased over time (p<0.0001). Patients taking tolterodine (odds ratio [OR] 1.03; p=0.01) and darifenacin (OR 1.12; p=0.0006) were significantly more likely to change their prescription than those taking oxybutynin. There was no association seen for patients taking solifenacin (p=0.6) and trospium (p=0.9). CONCLUSIONS: There are an increasing number of anticholinergic prescriptions being filled annually. Patients taking newer anticholinergics are at least as likely to change therapy as those taking oxybutynin. The reimbursement environment in BC likely affects these results. Restrictions in the available data limit assessment of other relevant predictors.
INTRODUCTION: We sought to understand the contemporary pharmacologic management of overactive bladder (OAB) in a single-payer system. We examined temporal trends in the use of anticholinergic medications and assessed whether the likelihood of patients changing their anticholinergic therapy was predicted by their current therapy. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, population-based analysis of prescription records from the PharmaNet database in BC, Canada. We identified patients treated with one or more anticholinergic prescriptions between 2001 and 2009. We characterized temporal trends in the use of anticholinergic medications. We used generalized estimating equations with a logit wing to assess the relationship between the type of anticholinergic medication and the change in prescription. RESULTS: The 114 325 included patients filled 1 140 296 anti-cholinergic prescriptions. The number of prescriptions each year increased over the study, both in aggregate and for each individual medication. While oxybutynin was the most commonly prescribed medication (68% of all prescriptions), the proportion of newer anticholinergics (solifenacin, darifenacin, and trospium) prescribed increased over time (p<0.0001). Patients taking tolterodine (odds ratio [OR] 1.03; p=0.01) and darifenacin (OR 1.12; p=0.0006) were significantly more likely to change their prescription than those taking oxybutynin. There was no association seen for patients taking solifenacin (p=0.6) and trospium (p=0.9). CONCLUSIONS: There are an increasing number of anticholinergic prescriptions being filled annually. Patients taking newer anticholinergics are at least as likely to change therapy as those taking oxybutynin. The reimbursement environment in BC likely affects these results. Restrictions in the available data limit assessment of other relevant predictors.
Authors: Debra E Irwin; Ian Milsom; Steinar Hunskaar; Kate Reilly; Zoe Kopp; Sender Herschorn; Karin Coyne; Con Kelleher; Christian Hampel; Walter Artibani; Paul Abrams Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2006-10-02 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Tatyana Shamliyan; Jean F Wyman; Rema Ramakrishnan; François Sainfort; Robert L Kane Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2012-06-19 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Michael B Chancellor; Kristen Migliaccio-Walle; Thomas J Bramley; Sham L Chaudhari; Catherine Corbell; Denise Globe Journal: Clin Ther Date: 2013-10-03 Impact factor: 3.393
Authors: Bernard T Haylen; Dirk de Ridder; Robert M Freeman; Steven E Swift; Bary Berghmans; Joseph Lee; Ash Monga; Eckhard Petri; Diaa E Rizk; Peter K Sand; Gabriel N Schaer Journal: Neurourol Urodyn Date: 2010 Impact factor: 2.696
Authors: Joshua S Benner; Michael B Nichol; Eric S Rovner; Zhanna Jumadilova; Jose Alvir; Mohamed Hussein; Kristina Fanning; Jeffrey N Trocio; Linda Brubaker Journal: BJU Int Date: 2009-11-12 Impact factor: 5.588