| Literature DB >> 27877611 |
Matthias Bönisch1, Mariana Calin1, Thomas Waitz2, Ajit Panigrahi2, Michael Zehetbauer2, Annett Gebert1, Werner Skrotzki3, Jürgen Eckert4.
Abstract
Aiming at understanding the governing microstructural phenomena during heat treatments of Ni-free Ti-based shape memory materials for biomedical applications, a series of Ti-Nb alloys with Nb concentrations up to 29 wt% was produced by cold-crucible casting, followed by homogenization treatment and water quenching. Despite the large amount of literature available concerning the thermal stability and ageing behavior of Ti-Nb alloys, only few studies were performed dealing with the isochronal transformation behavior of initially martensitic Ti-Nb alloys. In this work, the formation of martensites (α' and α″) and their stability under different thermal processing conditions were investigated by a combination of x-ray diffraction, differential scanning calorimetry, dilatometry and electron microscopy. The effect of Nb additions on the structural competition in correlation with stable and metastable phase diagrams was also studied. Alloys with 24 wt% Nb or less undergo a [Formula: see text] transformation sequence on heating from room temperature to 1155 K. In alloys containing >24 wt% Nb α″ martensitically reverts back to β0, which is highly unstable against chemical demixing by formation of isothermal ωiso. During slow cooling from the single phase β domain α precipitates and only very limited amounts of α″ martensite form.Entities:
Keywords: 10.07; biomedical applications; differential scanning calorimetry; dilatometry; martensite; niobium; thermal stability; titanium
Year: 2013 PMID: 27877611 PMCID: PMC5090374 DOI: 10.1088/1468-6996/14/5/055004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Technol Adv Mater ISSN: 1468-6996 Impact factor: 8.090
Nb and O contents of the as-cast alloys. The fraction of Ti is the balance to 100 wt%.
| Nominal composition (wt%) | Analysis results | |
|---|---|---|
| Nb (wt%) | O (wt%) | |
| Ti–14Nb | 13.7 | 0.097 |
| Ti–16.5Nb | 16.1 | 0.103 |
| Ti–19Nb | 18.6 | 0.082 |
| Ti–21.5Nb | 21.1 | 0.082 |
| Ti–24Nb | 23.5 | 0.139 |
| Ti–26.5Nb | 26.2 | 0.129 |
| Ti–29Nb | 28.5 | 0.099 |
Figure 1.XRD-patterns of homogenized and water-quenched Ti–(14–29)Nb alloys.
Figure 2.Secondary electron SEM micrograph of the as-quenched Ti–19Nb alloy illustrating the needle-like morphology of martensitic microstructure. GBs: grain boundaries.
Figure 3.DSC scans of homogenized and water quenched alloys during the first two cycles: (a) first and second heating, (b) first and second cooling.
Overview of specimens used for phase analysis after additional heat treatment.
| Alloy (wt%) | Specimen | Heat treatment | Resulting phases |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ti–14Nb | P1 | ↑1420 K↓RT (10 K min−1) | |
| Ti–21.5Nb | P2 | ↑813 K+WQ | |
| P3 | ↑1420 K↓RT (10 K min−1) | ||
| Ti–29Nb | P4 | ↑550 K+WQ | |
| P5 | ↑670 K+WQ | ||
| P6 | ↑818 K+WQ | ||
| P7 | ↑1420 K↓670 K+WQ | ||
| P8 | ↑1420 K↓RT (10 K min−1) |
Heat treated in the DSC.
Heat treated in the furnace.
Figure 4.First DSC and dilatometry cycles (right) of Ti–14Nb in relation to the Ti–Nb phase diagrams (left). Dotted lines belong to the equilibrium α/β diagram. Gray areas represent the miscibility gaps in the metastable ω/β phase diagram.
Figure 5.XRD-patterns of heat-treated Ti–Nb alloys. (a) Ti–14Nb, (b)–(c) Ti–21.5Nb and (d)–(h) Ti–29Nb. Intensities are plotted logarithmically for better visibility of low intensity reflections.
Figure 6.First DSC and dilatometry cycles (right) of Ti–21.5Nb in relation to the Ti–Nb phase diagrams (left). Gray areas represent the miscibility gaps in the metastable ω/β phase diagram.
Figure 7.First DSC and dilatometry cycles (right) of Ti–29Nb in relation to the Ti–Nb phase diagrams (left). Gray areas represent the miscibility gaps in the metastable ω/β phase diagram.
Figure 8.(a) Dark-field (DF) TEM image of ωiso precipitates and (b) the corresponding selected area electron diffraction pattern exhibiting sharp reflections of two ω variants as well as pronounced double diffraction. The beam direction was parallel to [011] of β and [] of both ω variants. The reflection used for imageing the ωiso precipitates in (a) is marked by a circle. In the key diagram (c) primary reflections are represented by filled symbols, open symbols and crosses represent reflections caused by double diffraction.