Literature DB >> 2787735

A longitudinal survey of self-reported bowel habits in the United States.

J E Everhart1, V L Go, R S Johannes, S C Fitzsimmons, H P Roth, L R White.   

Abstract

Information concerning bowel habits was gathered from a representative sample of 14,407 United States adults in the first National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey in 1971-1975 and approximately 10 years later among the same individuals. The prevalence of self-reported constipation, diarrhea, infrequent defecation (three or fewer bowel movements per week), and frequent defecation (two or more bowel movements per day) increased with aging. Women were more likely than men (P less than 0.05) to report constipation (20.8% compared to 8.0%) and infrequent defecation (9.1% compared to 3.2%). Blacks were more likely than whites to report infrequent defecation (P less than 0.05). Older respondents reporting constipation were more likely to use laxatives or stool softeners than younger respondents reporting constipation, but they were also less likely to have infrequent defecation. To evaluate factors predictive of impaired bowel function, case definitions were created using information concerning complaint of constipation, laxative use, frequency of defecation, and stool consistency. Female gender, black race, fewer years of education, low physical activity, and symptoms of depression were independent risk factors for impaired bowel function. This study provides national estimates of bowel complaints and their natural history and examines possible risk factors for constipation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2787735     DOI: 10.1007/bf01537261

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  17 in total

1.  Bowel habit in older people.

Authors:  J S Milne; J Williamson
Journal:  Gerontol Clin (Basel)       Date:  1972

2.  Defaecation frequencies in Black, Indian, Coloured and White populations - what do they signify?

Authors:  A R Walker; B F Walker; D Bhamjee; E J Walker; J Ncongwane; I Segal
Journal:  S Afr Med J       Date:  1982-08-07

3.  Gastrointestinal transit: the effect of the menstrual cycle.

Authors:  A Wald; D H Van Thiel; L Hoechstetter; J S Gavaler; K M Egler; R Verm; L Scott; R Lester
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  A statistical methodology for analyzing data from a complex survey: the first National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Authors:  J R Landis; J M Lepkowski; S A Eklund; S A Stehouwer
Journal:  Vital Health Stat 2       Date:  1982-09

5.  A study of constipation in the elderly living at home.

Authors:  I P Donald; R G Smith; J G Cruikshank; R A Elton; M E Stoddart
Journal:  Gerontology       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 5.140

6.  How trustworthy are bowel histories? Comparison of recalled and recorded information.

Authors:  A P Manning; J B Wyman; K W Heaton
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1976-07-24

7.  Demographic and dietary determinants of constipation in the US population.

Authors:  R S Sandler; M C Jordan; B J Shelton
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Severe chronic constipation of young women: 'idiopathic slow transit constipation'.

Authors:  D M Preston; J E Lennard-Jones
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  SOME PRELIMINARY FINDINGS ON PHYSICAL COMPLAINTS FROM A PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF 1,064,004 MEN AND WOMEN.

Authors:  E C HAMMOND
Journal:  Am J Public Health Nations Health       Date:  1964-01

10.  Bowel habits in young adults not seeking health care.

Authors:  R S Sandler; D A Drossman
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 3.199

View more
  76 in total

Review 1.  Rectocele: pathogenesis and surgical management.

Authors:  A P Zbar; A Lienemann; H Fritsch; M Beer-Gabel; M Pescatori
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2003-03-29       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  Identifying and managing patients at low risk of bowel cancer in general practice.

Authors:  M R Thompson; I Heath; B G Ellis; E T Swarbrick; L Faulds Wood; W S Atkin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-08-02

3.  What is chronic constipation? Definition and diagnosis.

Authors:  James R Gray
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.522

Review 4.  Lubiprostone in constipation: clinical evidence and place in therapy.

Authors:  Nicholas Wilson; Ron Schey
Journal:  Ther Adv Chronic Dis       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 5.091

5.  Factors associated with persistent and nonpersistent chronic constipation, over 20 years.

Authors:  Rok Seon Choung; G Richard Locke; Enrique Rey; Cathy D Schleck; Charles Baum; Alan R Zinsmeister; Nicholas J Talley
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2012-01-28       Impact factor: 11.382

6.  Comparison of bowel patterns in Hispanics and non-Hispanic whites.

Authors:  M J Zuckerman; L G Guerra; D A Drossman; J A Foland; G G Gregory
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  The evaluation of constipation.

Authors:  Matthew D Vrees; Eric G Weiss
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2005-05

8.  Work-up of the constipated patient.

Authors:  Elisa H Birnbaum
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2008-11

9.  Pilot study of pathophysiology of constipation among community diabetics.

Authors:  D Maleki; M Camilleri; D D Burton; D M Rath-Harvey; L Oenning; J H Pemberton; P A Low
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Prospective cohort studies of bowel movement frequency and laxative use and colorectal cancer incidence in US women and men.

Authors:  Xuehong Zhang; Kana Wu; Eunyoung Cho; Jing Ma; Andrew T Chan; Xiang Gao; Walter C Willett; Charles S Fuchs; Edward L Giovannucci
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2013-03-02       Impact factor: 2.506

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.