| Literature DB >> 27876885 |
Gang Chen1, Zhi-Xiang Wu1, An-Ping Yu1, Zhi-Hai Zhang1, Zhong-Quan Wen1, Kun Zhang1,2, Lu-Ru Dai2, Sen-Lin Jiang1, Yu-Yan Li1, Li Chen1, Chang-Tao Wang3, Xian-Gang Luo3.
Abstract
The generation of a sub-diffraction optical hollow ring is of great interest in various applications, such as optical microscopy, optical tweezers, and nanolithography. Azimuthally polarized light is a good candidate for creating an optical hollow ring structure. Various of methods have been proposed theoretically for generation of sub-wavelength hollow ring by focusing azimuthally polarized light, but without experimental demonstrations, especially for sub-diffraction focusing. Super-oscillation is a promising approach for shaping sub-diffraction optical focusing. In this paper, a planar sub-diffraction diffractive lens is proposed, which has an ultra-long focal length of 600 λ and small numerical aperture of 0.64. A sub-diffraction hollow ring is experimentally created by shaping an azimuthally polarized wave. The full-width-at-half-maximum of the hollow ring is 0.61 λ, which is smaller than the lens diffraction limit 0.78 λ, and the observed largest sidelobe intensity is only 10% of the peak intensity.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27876885 PMCID: PMC5120339 DOI: 10.1038/srep37776
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1(a) Generation of a sub-diffraction hollow ring by shaping the azimuthally polarized wave with a planar binary phase lens, and (b) the micro lens structure.
Figure 2(a) The normalized theoretical intensity and phase distribution of the incident azimuthally polarized light; (b) the optimized lens phase distribution; (c) the designed intensity and phase distribution on the focal plane. The inset of (b) is the zoom-in plot of the lens phase distribution and the inset of (c) is the normalized intensity on the focal plane.
Figure 3COMSOL Multiphysics simulation results.
(a) The color map of the intensity distribution on the focal plane; (b) the variation of the optical intensity along the radial direction on the focal plane; (c) the change in the FWHM, peak intensity, and sidelobe ratio along the propagation axis Z. The inset of (b) gives the comparison between the theoretical design and the COMSOL simulation.
Figure 4(a) The SEM images of the micro lens, and (b) the zoom-in of the lens central part.
Figure 5The intensity distribution of the incident azimuthally polarized wave at five different directions with angles of 0, 0.2 π, 0.4 π, 0.6 π, and 0.8 π crossing the beam’s center on the lens input surface.
Figure 6The (a) 3D and (b) 2D color maps of the measured optical intensity on the focal plane; the optical intensity distribution along the (c) x-axis and (b) y-axis.
Figure 7The optical intensity distribution taken in a large range in the x-direction across the focus center on the focal plane.