| Literature DB >> 27876835 |
Fei Ma1, Tianfeng Wu2, Jiangang Zhao3, Aili Song3, Huan Liu2, Weili Xu1,4, Guowei Huang2.
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate whether folic acid supplementation would improve cognitive performance by reducing serum inflammatory cytokine concentrations. This RCT was performed in Tianjin, China. Participants with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) were randomly assigned to the folic acid (400 μg/day) or conventional treatment groups. Neuropsychological tests were administered, and folate, homocysteine, vitamin B12, IL-6, TNF-α, Aβ-42, and Aβ-40 were measured at baseline and at 6- and 12-month time points.152 participants (folic acid: 77, conventional: 75) completed the trial. Significant improvements in folate (ηp2 = 0.703, P = 0.011), homocysteine (ηp2 = 0.644, P = 0.009), Aβ-42 (ηp2 = 0.687, P = 0.013), peripheral IL-6 (ηp2 = 0.477, P = 0.025), TNF-α (ηp2 = 0.709, P = 0.009) levels were observed in folic acid group compared with conventional group. Folic acid supplementation improved the Full Scale Intelligence Quotient (P = 0.028; effect size d = 0.153), Information (P = 0.031; d = 0.157) and Digit Span (P = 0.009; d = 0.172) scores at 12 months compared with conventional treatment. Based on these findings, daily oral administration of a 400-μg folic acid supplement to MCI subjects for 12 months can significantly improve cognitive performance and reduce peripheral inflammatory cytokine levels.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27876835 PMCID: PMC5120319 DOI: 10.1038/srep37486
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Flow diagram of the subjects’ enrollment from the initial contact through study completion.
Baseline characteristics of the study population.
| Profile | Folic acid group (n = 84) | Control group (n = 84) | P-valuea |
|---|---|---|---|
| Demographics | |||
| Age at screening (years) | 73.71 ± 2.57 | 73.52 ± 3.03 | 0.77 |
| Female | 57 (67.86) | 58 (69.05) | 0.43 |
| Total education (years) | 9.14 ± 3.53 | 9.81 ± 3.09 | 0.15 |
| Lifestyle | |||
| Smoker—ever | 51 (60.71) | 53 (63.10) | 0.19 |
| Alcohol (units/week) | 9.09 ± 9.11 | 8.51 ± 8.33 | 0.13 |
| Systolic BP (mmHg) | 145 ± 22 | 147 ± 24 | 0.66 |
| Diastolic BP (mmHg) | 82 ± 11 | 81 ± 10 | 0.54 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 24.53 ± 3.79 | 25.01 ± 4.11 | 0.17 |
| Medical history | |||
| Diabetes mellitus—ever | 5 (5.95) | 4 (4.76) | 0.13 |
| Hypertension | 6 (7.14) | 7 (8.33) | 0.64 |
| Vascular disease | 11 (13.10) | 10 (11.90) | 0.24 |
| MMSE | 25.60 ± 2.22 | 26.13 ± 2.51 | 0.33 |
| Folate (ng/mL) | 7.01 ± 1.01 | 6.33 ± 0.97 | 0.44 |
| Hcy (mmol/L) | 13.65 ± 4.82 | 12.19 ± 3.85 | 0.57 |
| Vitamin B12(pg/mL) | 571.25 ± 23.37 | 568.48 ± 16.33 | 0.46 |
Results are shown as n (%) for the chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests and as the mean ± SD for independent t-tests (two-tailed). aP < 0.01: significant difference between groups. Abbreviations: BP, blood pressure; BMI, Body Mass Index; Hcy, homocysteine.
The levels of serum biomarker parameters in the folic acid and control groups at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months.
| Item | Groups | Cases (n) | Treatment time* | Repeated measures§ | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before treatment | 6 months | 12 months | Interaction effect, P ( | Time effect, P ( | Group effect, P ( | |||
| Folate (ng/mL) | Intervention | 84 | 7.01 ± 3.64 | 8.97 ± 0.62 | 9.44 ± 0.33 | 0.011 (0.703) | 0.016 (0.117) | 0.229 (0.041) |
| Control | 84 | 5.79 ± 2.67 | 5.96 ± 2.11 | 5.88 ± 2.03 | ||||
| Hcy (μmol/L) | Intervention | 84 | 13.65 ± 4.82 | 9.49 ± 5.72 | 8.21 ± 4.22 | 0.009 (0.644) | 0.046 (0.098) | 0.723 (0.007) |
| Control | 84 | 12.19 ± 3.85 | 10.97 ± 2.42 | 11.33 ± 4.51 | ||||
| Vitamin B12(pg/mL) | Intervention | 84 | 571.25 ± 23.37 | 583.78 ± 25.44 | 571.33 ± 20.45 | 0.279 (0.103) | 0.588 (0.094) | 0.271 (0.211) |
| Control | 84 | 568.48 ± 16.33 | 537.43 ± 27.39 | 555.45 ± 19.58 | ||||
| Aβ-40(pg/mL) | Intervention | 84 | 53.06 ± 1.02 | 52.44 ± 1.28 | 51.50 ± 1.08 | 0.306 (0.042) | 0.677 (0.016) | 0.479 (0.013) |
| Control | 84 | 53.55 ± 1.84 | 53.45 ± 1.27 | 52.49 ± 1.07 | ||||
| Aβ-42(pg/mL) | Intervention | 84 | 53.07 ± 1.04 | 50.23 ± 1.29 | 49.16 ± 1.09 | 0.013 (0.687) | 0.609 (0.028) | 0.463 (0.021) |
| Control | 84 | 53.55 ± 1.84 | 53.45 ± 1.27 | 52.49 ± 1.07 | ||||
| IL-6(pg/mL) | Intervention | 84 | 9.48 ± 0.22 | 9.21 ± 0.39 | 7.71 ± 0.21 | 0.025 (0.477) | 0.247 (0.047) | 0.948 (0.001) |
| Control | 84 | 9.56 ± 0.19 | 9.39 ± 0.28 | 9.01 ± 0.17 | ||||
| TNF-α(pg/mL) | Intervention | 84 | 138.41 ± 2.44 | 126.21 ± 7.97 | 101.09 ± 6.76 | 0.009(0.709) | 0.011*(0.123) | 0.229 (0.044) |
| Control | 84 | 139.21 ± 2.73 | 140.21 ± 6.58 | 138.77 ± 6.97 | ||||
§ηp2 describes the percentage of variance in the dependent variable explained by a predictor variable. P values for each group (intervention versus control) were derived from the ANCOVA and adjusted for the respective baseline values.
Abbreviations: Hcy, homocysteine; IL-6, interleukin-6; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-α.
Neuropsychological test results at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months.
| Cognitive test | Groups | Cases (n) | Treatment time | Repeated measures | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before treatment | 6 months | 12 months | Interaction effect, P (ηp2) | Time effect, P (ηp2) | Group effect, P (ηp2) | |||
| Full Scale IQ | Intervention | 84 | −1.10 ± 0.95 | 0.25 ± 0.09 | 0.85 ± 1.04 | 0.044 (0.082) | 0.286 (0.049) | 0.376 (0.022) |
| Control | 84 | −0.87 ± 0.90 | 0.11 ± 0.18 | 0.16 ± 0.61 | ||||
| Information | Intervention | 84 | −0.61 ± 0.24 | 0.54 ± 0.86 | 1.15 ± 1.10 | 0.000 (0.452) | 0.609 (0.021) | 0.507 (0.023) |
| Control | 84 | −0.70 ± 0.04 | 0.23 ± 1.02 | 0.25 ± 0.98 | ||||
| Comprehension | Intervention | 84 | 1.05 ± 1.08 | 1. 01 ± 0.88 | 0.94 ± 0.20 | 0.059 (0.087) | 0.116 (0.082) | 0.359 (0.034) |
| Control | 84 | 1.09 ± 1.14 | 1.08 ± 0.40 | 1.21 ± 0.73 | ||||
| Digit Span | Intervention | 84 | 1.37 ± 0.21 | 1.77 ± 1.09 | 1.96 ± 0.88 | 0.000 (0.388) | 0.063 (0.092) | 0.509 (0.016) |
| Control | 84 | 1.44 ± 0.52 | 1.54 ± 0.63 | 1.39 ± 1.15 | ||||
| Vocabulary | Intervention | 84 | −1.05 ± 0.15 | 0.14 ± 1.07 | 0.12 ± 0.92 | 0.189 (0.055) | 0.144 (0.064) | 0.854 (0.007) |
| Control | 84 | −1.07 ± 0.37 | 0. 1 ± 1.13 | 0.16 ± 0.76 | ||||
| Arithmetic | Intervention | 84 | −1.00 ± 0.58 | −1.00 ± 1.15 | −0.91 ± 0.58 | 0.388 (0.032) | 0.679 (0.015) | 0.471 (0.014) |
| Control | 84 | −0.76 ± 1.12 | −1.13 ± 0.32 | −0.37 ± 0.80 | ||||
| Similarities | Intervention | 84 | −1.04 ± 0.82 | 1.02 ± 1.12 | 0.98 ± 0.30 | 0.688 (0.015) | 0.706 (0.015) | 0.516 (0.014) |
| Control | 84 | −1.05 ± 1.09 | 1.11 ± 0.22 | 0.94 ± 0.87 | ||||
| Picture Completion | Intervention | 84 | −0.31 ± 0.55 | 0.81 ± 0.60 | 0.72 ± 1.15 | 0.282 (0.087) | 0.756 (0.012) | 0.842 (0.009) |
| Control | 84 | −0.87 ± 0.81 | 1.09 ± 0.31 | 0.83 ± 1.12 | ||||
| Picture Arrangement | Intervention | 84 | −1.05 ± 1.15 | 0.94 ± 0.62 | 0.11 ± 0.54 | 0.116 (0.096) | 0.225 (0.0523) | 0.839 (0.007) |
| Control | 84 | −0.94 ± 0.25 | −1.05 ± 0.85 | 0.10 ± 1.10 | ||||
| Block Design | Intervention | 84 | −1.02 ± 1.05 | −0.99 ± 0.94 | 1.01 ± 0.11 | 0.385 (0.064) | 0.242 (0.059) | 0.309 (0.033) |
| Control | 84 | −1.23 ± 0.75 | −0.71 ± 0.39 | 0.98 ± 1.14 | ||||
| Object Assembly | Intervention | 84 | 1.53 ± 0.84 | −1.15 ± 0.27 | 0.62 ± 1.11 | 0.721 (0.012) | 0.260 (0.046) | 0.657 (0.022) |
| Control | 84 | 1.15 ± 1.13 | −0.63 ± 0.36 | 0.53 ± 0.77 | ||||
| Digit Symbol | Intervention | 84 | −0.87 ± 1.15 | −0.23 ± 0.51 | 1.09 ± 0.64 | 0.911 (0.007) | 0.255 (0.052) | 0.751 (0.012) |
| Control | 84 | −1.15 ± 0.78 | −0.52 ± 0.35 | 0.63 ± 1.13 | ||||
Z scores are shown; the data are standardized according to the crude cognitive test scores at baseline and after 6 months (or 12 months), which were pooled to calculate the grand mean and SD per test.
§ηp2 describes the percentage of variance in the dependent variable explained by a predictor variable. P values for each group (intervention versus control) were derived from the ANCOVA and adjusted for the respective baseline values.
P values for each group (intervention versus control) were derived from the ANCOVA and adjusted for the respective baseline values. Abbreviations: IQ, Intelligence Quotient.
Interaction between vitamin B12 status and serum folate levels in relation to the Full Scale IQ at baseline, 6 months and 12 months.
| Vitamin B12 status | Groups | Cases (n) | Treatment time | Repeated measures | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before treatment | 6 months | 12 months | Interaction effect P (ηp2) | Time effect P (ηp2) | Group effect P (ηp2) | |||
| High vitamin B12 status (>569.24 pg/mL) | Intervention | 32 | −1.11 ± 0.92 | 0.24 ± 0.07 | 0.82 ± 1.07 | 0.032 (0.109) | 0.279 (0.043) | 0.158 (0.671) |
| Control | 30 | −0.86 ± 0.91 | 0.12 ± 0.15 | 0.13 ± 0.63 | ||||
| Low vitamin B12 status (<569.24 pg/mL) | Intervention | 52 | −1.02 ± 0.54 | −1.07 ± 1.05 | −0.92 ± 0.52 | 0.351 (0.019) | 0.552 (0.008) | 0.477 (0.123) |
| Control | 54 | −0.72 ± 1.02 | −1.10 ± 0.33 | −0.33 ± 0.61 | ||||
According to the crude cognitive test scores at baseline and after 6 months (or 12 months), which were pooled to calculate the grand mean and SD per test.
§ηp2 describes the percentage of variance in the dependent variable explained by a predictor variable. P values for each group (intervention versus control) were derived from the ANCOVA and adjusted for the respective baseline values.
P values for each group (intervention versus control) were derived from the ANCOVA and adjusted for the respective baseline values. Abbreviations: IQ, Intelligence Quotient.
Mixed-model analysis describing the association between the Full Scale IQ, Information, and Digit Span test scores and the laboratory variables at baseline.
| Cognition score | Estimate | SEMs | P value | 95% CI | Effect size, P | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | ||||||
| Full Scale IQ | |||||||
| Intercept | 20.561 | 0.258 | 15.471 | 0.009 | 19.433 | 24.294 | |
| Hcy (baseline) | −0.118 | 0.034 | −2.073 | 0.029 | −0.230 | −0.016 | |
| IL-6 (baseline) | −0.154 | 0.021 | −2.051 | 0.037 | −0.262 | −0.051 | |
| TNF-α(baseline) | −0.583 | 0.197 | −3.251 | 0.013 | −0.726 | −0.458 | |
| Aβ-42 (baseline) | −0.297 | 0.264 | −1.148 | 0.267 | −0.595 | 0.016 | |
| FA × wave | 0.153 | ||||||
| FA × Baseline | 0.001 | 0.001 | |||||
| FA × 6 months | −0.238 | 0.225 | −1.093 | 0.188 | −0.749 | 0.224 | |
| FA × 12 months | 0.512 | 0.243 | 2.503 | 0.027 | 0.074 | 1.145 | |
| Information | |||||||
| Intercept | 6.163 | 0.231 | 18.466 | 0.007 | 5.638 | 6.702 | |
| Hcy (baseline) | −0.078 | 0.029 | −4.873 | 0.000 | −0.114 | −0.045 | |
| IL-6 (baseline) | −0.141 | 0.015 | −4.401 | 0.0123 | −0.246 | −0.035 | |
| TNF-α(baseline) | −0.534 | 0.029 | −4.144 | 0.015 | −0.685 | −0.409 | |
| Aβ-42 (baseline) | −0.071 | 0.163 | −1.021 | 0.343 | −0.246 | 0.118 | |
| FA × wave | 0.157 | ||||||
| FA × Baseline | 0.001 | 0.001 | |||||
| FA × 6 months | −0.068 | 0.109 | −0.567 | 0.573 | −0.303 | 0.169 | |
| FA × 12 months | 0.222 | 0.133 | 2.040 | 0.026 | 0.013 | 0.462 | |
| Digit span | |||||||
| Intercept | 4.727 | 0.257 | 15.977 | 0.001 | 4.152 | 5.303 | |
| Hcy (baseline) | −0.053 | 0.032 | −3.277 | 0.006 | −0.087 | −0.032 | |
| IL-6 (baseline) | −0.142 | 0.016 | −4.403 | 0.011 | −0.249 | −0.040 | |
| TNF-α(baseline) | −0.587 | 0.069 | −4.159 | 0.012 | −0.732 | −0.461 | |
| Aβ-42 (baseline) | −0.159 | 0.157 | −1.629 | 0.113 | −0.372 | 0.048 | |
| FA × wave | 0.172 | ||||||
| FA × Baseline | 0.001 | 0.001 | |||||
| FA × 6months | 0.030 | 0.129 | 0.245 | 0.827 | −0.211 | 0.259 | |
| FA × 12 months | 0.309 | 0.148 | 2.571 | 0.007 | 0.094 | 0.588 | |
Abbreviations: IQ, Intelligence Quotient; Hcy, homocysteine; IL-6, Interleukin-6; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-α; FA, folate; Aβ, amyloid β-protein.
aReference category.
bCohen’s d refers to the magnitude of the standardized mean effect (i.e., the mean difference between two groups in SD units). Significance was set at P < 0.05.