| Literature DB >> 27876827 |
Liqiong Yang1,2,3, Pan Luo1,2,3, Li Wen1,2,3, Dejun Li1,2.
Abstract
This study was aimed to investigate the direction and magnitude of soil organic carbon (SOC) dynamics and the underlying mechanisms following agricultural abandonment in a subtropical karst area, southwest China. Two post-agriculture succession sequences including grassland (~10 years), shrubland (~29 years), secondary forest (~59 years) and primary forest with cropland as reference were selected. SOC and other soil physicochemical variables in the soil depth of 0-15 cm (representing the average soil depth of the slope in the studied area) were measured. SOC content in the grassland was not significantly elevated relative to the cropland (42.0 ± 7.3 Mg C ha-1). SOC content in the shrubland reached the level of the primary forest. On average, SOC content for the forest was 92.6 ± 4.2 Mg C ha-1, representing an increase of 120.4 ± 10.0% or 50.6 ± 4.2 Mg ha-1 relative to the cropland. Following agricultural abandonment, SOC recovered to the primary forest level in about 40 years with a rate of 1.38 Mg C ha-1 yr-1. Exchangeable Ca and Mg were found to be the strongest predictors of SOC dynamics. Our results suggest that SOC content may recover rapidly following agricultural abandonment in the karst region of southwest China.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27876827 PMCID: PMC5120287 DOI: 10.1038/srep37118
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Variation of SOC content along post-agriculture succession for sequence I, sequence II and the overall data set (CR, cropland; GR, grassland; SH, shrubland; SF, secondary forest; PF, primary forest).
Bars represent mean ± standard error. Different letters represent significant difference among successional stages at p < 0.05 level.
Figure 2Relationship between SOC content and years following agricultural abandonment (y = 41.23 + 54.64(1 − exp(−0.17×))76.28, r2 = 0.75, p < 0.0001, n = 21).
Each point denotes the mixture of 10 soil samples in a plot.
Pearson’s correlation coefficients based on the multiple linear regression analysis.
| Ca | K | Mg | Na | Clay | Silt | Sand | P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K | 0.33 | |||||||
| Mg | 0.98** | 0.29 | ||||||
| Na | −0.02 | 0.04 | −0.07 | |||||
| Clay | −0.92** | −0.28 | −0.91** | 0.17 | ||||
| Silt | 0.82** | 0.28 | 0.77** | −0.06 | −0.90** | |||
| Sand | 0.75** | 0.18 | 0.80** | −0.27 | −0.76** | 0.45* | ||
| P | 0.75** | 0.40* | 0.72** | 0.19 | −0.70** | 0.65** | 0.52** | |
| SOC | 0.94** | 0.44* | 0.94** | −0.16 | −0.93** | 0.82** | 0.76** | 0.76** |
*And ** denote p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively.
Figure 3Relationship between SOC content and exchangeable Ca (y = 6.14 + 112.20(1 − exp(−0.05×), r2 = 0.93, p < 0.0001, n = 27) or Mg (y = 26.49 + 87.43(1 − exp(−0.11×), r2 = 0.93, p < 0.0001, n = 27).
Each point denotes the mixture of 10 soil samples in a plot.
Results of stepwise multiple linear regression analyses showing the dependence of SOC on soil physicochemical variables.
| Explanatory variable | Coefficient | Partial R2 | Model R2 | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ca | 0.98 | 0.891 | 0.89 | 0.000 |
| Clay | −1.34 | 0.025 | 0.92 | 0.014 |
| K | 28.30 | 0.021 | 0.94 | 0.012 |
Positive and negative values of coefficients denote positive and negative relationship, respectively, between the explanatory variables and SOC.
Figure 4Classification and regression tree (CART) showing how predictor variables explain SOC variance (86% variance explained).
Figure 5Normalized importance of each explanatory variable to SOC variance according to classification and regression tree analysis (CART).
Variation of bulk density (BD, g cm−3), pH, soil organic carbon (SOC, g C kg−1), total N (g N kg−1), total P (g P kg−1), exchangeable cations (cmol kg−1) and soil texture (%) along with vegetation succession (with a soil depth of 0–15 cm).
| BD | pH | SOC | N | C:N | P | Ca | K | Mg | Na | Clay | Silt | Sand | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CR | Mean | 1.32b | 6.31b | 20.86b | 1.69c | 14.16a | 0.52c | 8.61bc | 0.44ab | 1.95b | 0.37a | 32.66a | 50.58b | 16.77b |
| (n = 3) | SE | 0.01 | 0.09 | 4.45 | 0.28 | 0.66 | 0.03 | 2.36 | 0.10 | 1.27 | 0.06 | 1.36 | 0.65 | 0.70 |
| GR | Mean | 1.37a | 6.28b | 19.91b | 1.85c | 12.63a | 0.83b | 8.21c | 0.20c | 2.00b | 0.40a | 36.28a | 47.23c | 16.49b |
| (n = 6) | SE | 0.01 | 0.10 | 1.21 | 0.11 | 0.63 | 0.09 | 0.61 | 0.02 | 0.17 | 0.03 | 1.43 | 0.62 | 0.95 |
| SH | Mean | 1.16c | 6.88ab | 42.97a | 4.40b | 11.97a | 1.57a | 25.58ab | 0.31b | 9.42a | 0.52a | 23.48b | 58.54a | 17.99ab |
| (n = 6) | SE | 0.05 | 0.31 | 6.41 | 0.83 | 0.77 | 0.20 | 6.17 | 0.02 | 2.92 | 0.07 | 3.03 | 2.25 | 0.82 |
| SF | Mean | 1.01c | 7.31a | 64.59a | 6.65a | 13.52a | 1.37ab | 33.00a | 0.30b | 14.79a | 0.16b | 17.81b | 59.56a | 22.63a |
| (n = 6) | SE | 0.05 | 0.15 | 7.72 | 0.90 | 3.46 | 0.34 | 3.96 | 0.03 | 2.42 | 0.02 | 2.36 | 1.11 | 2.29 |
| PF | Mean | 1.05c | 6.91a | 57.88a | 5.57ab | 12.07a | 1.73a | 28.45a | 0.53a | 11.65a | 0.46a | 22.61b | 57.65a | 19.74ab |
| (n = 6) | SE | 0.03 | 0.18 | 5.42 | 0.42 | 0.26 | 0.07 | 3.27 | 0.07 | 1.67 | 0.04 | 1.35 | 0.88 | 1.51 |
Note: CR, cropland; GR, grassland; SH, shrubland; SF, secondary forest; PF, primary forest; SE, standard error. Different letters denote significant difference among succession stages at p < 0.05 level.