Literature DB >> 2787669

Interaction of amphotericin B and its N-fructosyl derivative with murine thymocytes: a comparative study using fluorescent membrane probes.

N Henry-Toulmé1, M Seman, J Bolard.   

Abstract

The polyene antibiotics amphotericin B (AmB) and N-(1-deoxy-D-fructos-1-yl)amphotericin (N-Fru-AmB) have different activity towards murine thymocytes (N-Fru-AmB is less toxic but is a potent immunomodulator). The interactions of the drugs with these cells have been studied by fluorescence methods. Fluorescence energy transfer from 1-[4-(trimethylammonio) phenyl]-6-phenylhexa-1,3,5-triene, p-toluenesulfonate (TMA-DPH) to polyenes was used to follow the binding of the two drugs to the plasma membrane. The results, confirmed by circular dichroism measurements, indicate that at saturation the ratio AmB bound/plasma membrane lipid is low (less than 1 molecule of polyene for 170 lipids). The slightly higher binding of AmB as compared to N-Fru-AmB demonstrates that affinity of the antibiotic for plasma membrane does not account for the activity of the polyenes towards lymphocytes. The effect of the two polyenes on membrane fluidity was studied by steady-state fluorescence anisotropy. The results suggest that AmB strongly perturbs the structure of the membrane whereas only a slight decrease of the anisotropy is observed with N-Fru-AmB in the range of concentration where the biological activity has been demonstrated. Polyene location was further investigated by comparing the energy transfer efficiency obtained with TMA-DPH and with the parental compound 1,6-diphenylhexa-1,3,5-triene, p-toluene sulfonate (DPH). While AmB binds to plasma membrane, as well as to intracellular structures, N-Fru-AmB seems to accumulate into the cell and bind to intracellular membrane structures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2787669     DOI: 10.1016/0005-2736(89)90061-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta        ISSN: 0006-3002


  8 in total

Review 1.  In vitro models for studying toxicity of antifungal agents.

Authors:  V Joly; J Bolard; P Yeni
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Amphotericin B: current understanding of mechanisms of action.

Authors:  J Brajtburg; W G Powderly; G S Kobayashi; G Medoff
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Na+, K+ and Cl- selectivity of the permeability pathways induced through sterol-containing membrane vesicles by amphotericin B and other polyene antibiotics.

Authors:  S C Hartsel; S K Benz; W Ayenew; J Bolard
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.733

4.  Amphotericin B incorporated into egg lecithin-bile salt mixed micelles: molecular and cellular aspects relevant to therapeutic efficacy in experimental mycoses.

Authors:  J Brajtburg; S Elberg; G S Kobayashi; J Bolard
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Use of cilofungin as direct fluorescent probe for monitoring antifungal drug-membrane interaction.

Authors:  Y T Ko; R D Ludescher; D J Frost; B P Wasserman
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Effect of amphotericin B on larval growth of Echinococcus multilocularis.

Authors:  Stefan Reuter; Marion Merkle; Klaus Brehm; Peter Kern; Burkhard Manfras
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  The endocytic process in CHO cells, a toxic pathway of the polyene antibiotic amphotericin B.

Authors:  A Vertut-Doï; S I Ohnishi; J Bolard
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Effect of ketoconazole on lethal action of amphotericin B on Leishmania mexicana promastigotes.

Authors:  H Ramos; M Saint-Pierre-Chazalet; J Bolard; B E Cohen
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 5.191

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.