Literature DB >> 27876633

Classification of nuclear morphology in endocytoscopy of colorectal neoplasms.

Toyoki Kudo1, Shin-Ei Kudo1, Yuichi Mori1, Kunihiko Wakamura1, Masashi Misawa1, Takemasa Hayashi1, Hideyuki Miyachi1, Atsushi Katagiri1, Fumio Ishida1, Haruhiro Inoue2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We investigated endocytoscopy (EC) findings that were considered risk factors for colorectal neoplasms and determined whether they could be used as new indices to identify carcinomas with massive submucosal invasion (SM-m) or worse outcomes.
METHODS: We performed a multivariate analysis of 8 factors on EC images to determine whether they were associated with SM-m or worse. Based on the results, we divided the EC3a category of the EC classification into low grade or high grade and investigated the diagnostic accuracy of this subclassification. In addition, we compared the diagnostic ability of EC for SM-m with that of other modalities (narrow-band imaging and pit pattern).
RESULTS: The multivariate analysis indicated that unclear glandular lumens (ULs), high degree of nuclear enlargement (HNE), and multilayered nuclei (MNs) were the most useful factors for the diagnosis of SM-m or worse. The odds ratios for these factors were 12.47, 12.29, and 10.48, respectively (P < .001). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, accuracy, and positive likelihood ratio for the diagnostic accuracy of the EC3a subclassification were 88.9%, 91.3%, 75.0%, 96.6%, 90.8%, and 10.2, respectively (P < .001). The sensitivity, negative predictive value, and accuracy of EC were significantly higher than those of narrow-band imaging and pit pattern.
CONCLUSIONS: From the EC findings, the presence of ULs, HNE, and MNs are important risk factors for SM-m or worse outcomes. Furthermore, the EC3a subclassification taking these findings into consideration could be effective for the diagnosis of SM-m or worse. (Clinical trial registration number: UMIN 000014906.).
Copyright © 2017 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27876633     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.10.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  4 in total

Review 1.  Endocytoscopy: technology and clinical application in the lower GI tract.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Takamaru; Shih Yea Sylvia Wu; Yutaka Saito
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2020-07-05

2.  Noncoding Centromeric RNA Expression Impairs Chromosome Stability in Human and Murine Stem Cells.

Authors:  David Y L Chan; Daniela Moralli; Suhail Khoja; Zoia L Monaco
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 3.434

Review 3.  Advances in optical gastrointestinal endoscopy: a technical review.

Authors:  Yubo Tang; Sharmila Anandasabapathy; Rebecca Richards-Kortum
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2020-09-19       Impact factor: 6.603

4.  New application of endocytoscope for histopathological diagnosis of colorectal lesions.

Authors:  Fumihiro Inoue; Daizen Hirata; Mineo Iwatate; Santa Hattori; Mikio Fujita; Wataru Sano; Tamotsu Sugai; Hiroshi Kawachi; Kazuhito Ichikawa; Yasushi Sano
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2022-08-16
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.