| Literature DB >> 27876549 |
Joel Quintino de Oliveira Júnior1, Ederson da Conceição Jesus2, Francy Junio Lisboa3, Ricardo Luis Louro Berbara3, Sergio Miana de Faria2.
Abstract
The family Leguminosae comprises approximately 20,000 species that mostly form symbioses with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and nitrogen-fixing bacteria (NFB). This study is aimed at investigating and confirming the dependence on nodulation and biological nitrogen fixation in the specie Piptadenia gonoacantha (Mart.) Macbr., which belongs to the Piptadenia group. Two consecutive experiments were performed in a greenhouse. The experiments were fully randomized with six replicates and a factorial scheme. For the treatments, the two AMF species and three NFB strains were combined to nodulate P. gonoacantha in addition to the control treatments. The results indicate this species' capacity for nodulation without the AMF; however, the AMF+NFB combinations yielded a considerable gain in P. gonoacantha shoot weight compared with the treatments that only included inoculating with bacteria or AMF. The results also confirm that the treatment effects among the AMF+NFB combinations produced different shoot dry weight/root dry weight ratios. We conclude that AMF is not necessary for nodulation and that this dependence improves species development because plant growth increases upon co-inoculation.Entities:
Keywords: Biological nitrogen fixation; Nodulation; Synergy; “Pau-jacaré”
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27876549 PMCID: PMC5221347 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjm.2016.10.013
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Microbiol ISSN: 1517-8382 Impact factor: 2.476
The effect of co-inoculation on Piptadenia gonoacantha development. Mean of three replicates.
| Treatment | SDW (mg) | NDW (mg) | Efficiency (%) | Efficacy (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20.00 | b | 0.00 | b | 50 | 18.2 | |
| BR 4812 | 30.00 | b | 0.00 | b | 75 | 27.3 |
| 40.00 | b | 0.00 | b | 102.5 | 36.4 | |
| Abs control | 40.00 | b | 0.00 | b | 100 | 36.4 |
| Nitrogen control | 50.00 | b | 0.00 | b | 125 | 45.45 |
| BR 4802 | 90.00 | ab | 14.12 | a | 225 | 81.82 |
| 110.00 | ab | 0.00 | b | 275 | 100 | |
| 261.00 | a | 122.37 | a | 652.5 | 237.2 | |
| CV (%) | 176.1 | 264.9 | ||||
Shoot dry weight.
Nodule dry weight.
Efficiency = (treat SDW/abscontrol SDW × 100).
Efficacy = (treat SDW/NT(NH4NO3) SDW × 100).
Nodule number, nodule dry weight (NDW), and mycorrhizal colonization rate in the inoculation treatments with without adding the mycorrhizal fungus of the second experiment using Piptadenia gonoacantha and the mycorrhization rate. Mean of three replicates.
| Treatment | Nodule no. | NDW (mg) | Myc. rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 73 | 14.01 | 16 | |
| 73 | 13.11 | 11 | |
| 71 | 14.12 | 18 | |
| 21 | 5.20 | 25 | |
| BR 4802 | 52 | 11.33 | – |
| BSP1 | 99 | 14.45 | – |
The effect of co-inoculation on Piptadenia gonoacantha development. Mean of three replicates. Means followed by the same letter in the column do not differ at a 5% probability level by Tukey's test.
| Treatment | SDW (mg) | NDW (mg) | Efficiency (%) | Efficacy (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gig.marg | 60.86 | c | 0.00 | b | 68.39 | 45.30 |
| 82.41 | c | 0.00 | b | 92.58 | 61.33 | |
| Abs control | 89.11 | c | 0.00 | b | 100 | 66.32 |
| 131.33 | c | 14.51 | a | 147.57 | 97.74 | |
| 925.11 | a | 8.36 | ab | 1039.33 | 688.53 | |
| 746.33 | b | 11.01 | a | 838.58 | 555.47 | |
| BSP1 | 98.93 | c | 14.43 | a | 111.16 | 73.63 |
| 107.76 | c | 16.4 | a | 121.09 | 80.20 | |
| BR 4802 | 92.61 | c | 10.23 | a | 104.04 | 68.92 |
| 108.81 | c | 0.00 | b | 122.25 | 80.98 | |
| 134.36 | c | 0.00 | b | 150.97 | 100.00 | |
| CV(%) | 122.36 | 96.24 | ||||
Shoot dry weight.
Nodule dry weight.
Efficiency = (treat SDW/abscontrol SDW × 100).
Efficacy = (treat SDW/NT(NH4NO3) SDW × 100).
Comparative analysis between the SDW/ROOT ratios and between the treatments that yielded the greatest weight gain with the species Piptadenia gonoacantha. Mean of three replicates. Means followed by the same letter in the column did not differ at a 5% probability level using the Scott Knott test.
| Treatment | SDW/ROOT ratio |
|---|---|
| 0.48c | |
| BSP1 | 1.51b |
| 1.61b | |
| 1.71b | |
| 1.75b | |
| 1.83b | |
| Absolute control | 1.84b |
| BR 4802 | 1.87b |
| 2.05a | |
| 2.16a | |
| CV (%) | 12.66 |