Literature DB >> 27876514

An investigation of the spatial selectivity of the duration after-effect.

Jim Maarseveen1, Hinze Hogendoorn2, Frans A J Verstraten2, Chris L E Paffen3.   

Abstract

Adaptation to the duration of a visual stimulus causes the perceived duration of a subsequently presented stimulus with a slightly different duration to be skewed away from the adapted duration. This pattern of repulsion following adaptation is similar to that observed for other visual properties, such as orientation, and is considered evidence for the involvement of duration-selective mechanisms in duration encoding. Here, we investigated whether the encoding of duration - by duration-selective mechanisms - occurs early on in the visual processing hierarchy. To this end, we investigated the spatial specificity of the duration after-effect in two experiments. We measured the duration after-effect at adapter-test distances ranging between 0 and 15° of visual angle and for within- and between-hemifield presentations. We replicated the duration after-effect: the test stimulus was perceived to have a longer duration following adaptation to a shorter duration, and a shorter duration following adaptation to a longer duration. Importantly, this duration after-effect occurred at all measured distances, with no evidence for a decrease in the magnitude of the after-effect at larger distances or across hemifields. This shows that adaptation to duration does not result from adaptation occurring early on in the visual processing hierarchy. Instead, it seems likely that duration information is a high-level stimulus property that is encoded later on in the visual processing hierarchy.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Adaptation; Duration after-effect; Duration perception; Temporal processing

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27876514     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2016.11.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  8 in total

1.  Visual timing-tuned responses in human association cortices and response dynamics in early visual cortex.

Authors:  Evi Hendrikx; Jacob M Paul; Martijn van Ackooij; Nathan van der Stoep; Ben M Harvey
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 17.694

2.  Serial dependence in time and numerosity perception is dimension-specific.

Authors:  Irene Togoli; Marta Fedele; Michele Fornaciai; Domenica Bueti
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Multiple Time Intervals of Visual Events Are Represented as Discrete Items in Working Memory.

Authors:  Zhiwei Fan; Yuko Yotsumoto
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-08-02

4.  The duration aftereffect does not reflect adaptation to perceived duration.

Authors:  Jim Maarseveen; Chris L E Paffen; Frans A J Verstraten; Hinze Hogendoorn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Representations of time in human frontoparietal cortex.

Authors:  Masamichi J Hayashi; Wietske van der Zwaag; Domenica Bueti; Ryota Kanai
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2018-12-21

6.  Color Sensitivity of the Duration Aftereffect Depends on Sub- and Supra-second Durations.

Authors:  Bingxin Lin; Youguo Chen; Li Pan; Gang Du; Xiting Huang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-03-22

7.  Attention Gates the Selective Encoding of Duration.

Authors:  Jim Maarseveen; Hinze Hogendoorn; Frans A J Verstraten; Chris L E Paffen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Duration Selectivity in Right Parietal Cortex Reflects the Subjective Experience of Time.

Authors:  Masamichi J Hayashi; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 6.167

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.