| Literature DB >> 27876066 |
Peter Opriessnig1, Harald Mangge1, Rudolf Stollberger2, Hannes Deutschmann3, Gernot Reishofer4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Diffusion weighted (DW) cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has shown great potential to discriminate between healthy and diseased vessel tissue by evaluating the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) along the arterial axis. Recently, ex vivo studies on porcine arteries utilizing diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) revealed a circumferential fiber orientation rather than an organization in axial direction, suggesting dominant diffusion perpendicular to the slice direction. In the present study, we propose a method to access tangential and radial diffusion of carotids in vivo by utilizing a pulse sequence that enables high resolution DW imaging in combination with a two-dimensional (2D) diffusion gradient direction sampling scheme perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the artery.Entities:
Keywords: Atherosclerosis; Cardiovascular diseases; Cardiovascular magnetic resonance; Diffusion tensor imaging
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27876066 PMCID: PMC5120527 DOI: 10.1186/s12968-016-0304-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson ISSN: 1097-6647 Impact factor: 5.364
Fig. 1Gradient direction scheme to measure tangential and radial diffusion. Top, The concept of tangential and radial diffusion is outlined as well as the 2D ellipsoid with eigenvalues (λ) and eigenvectors (ε). Middle, The sketch outlines the anatomical region of interest (carotid artery) and the orientation of the 18 diffusion gradient directions on a hemicycle within a plane perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the carotid artery (black arrows). Bottom, Representative in vivo DWI from a carotid artery at a b-value of 600 s/mm2 for the 18 diffusion directions (white headless arrows)
Volunteer Demographics and mean diffusion components of the in vivo high resolution 2D-DTI case
| Demographic | Diffusion tensor | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volunteer | Age | Tangential (λ1) | Radial (λ2) | MD | FA |
| male | yr | mm2/s | mm2/s | mm2/s | |
| V1 | 27 | 1.59 ± 0.52 | 0.44 ± 0.32 | 1.02 ± 0.36 | 0.697 ± 0.192 |
| V2 | 29 | 1.84 ± 0.47 | 0.55 ± 0.22 | 1.19 ± 0.28 | 0.659 ± 0.147 |
| V3 | 32 | 1.85 ± 0.69 | 0.64 ± 0.36 | 1.24 ± 0.50 | 0.636 ± 0.151 |
| V4 | 33 | 2.29 ± 0.80 | 0.71 ± 0.30 | 1.50 ± 0.50 | 0.653 ± 0.118 |
| V5 | 33 | 3.61 ± 2.60 | 1.14 ± 0.52 | 2.38 ± 1.49 | 0.612 ± 0.131 |
| V6 | 34 | 3.10 ± 1.07 | 1.11 ± 0.44 | 2.11 ± 0.67 | 0.592 ± 0.145 |
| V7 | 37 | 2.05 ± 0.77 | 0.74 ± 0.43 | 1.40 ± 0.54 | 0.604 ± 0.180 |
| V8 | 41 | 2.31 ± 0.63 | 1.04 ± 0.39 | 1.68 ± 0.44 | 0.500 ± 0.148 |
| V9 | 44 | 2.56 ± 0.65 | 0.99 ± 0.48 | 1.78 ± 0.50 | 0.581 ± 0.181 |
| V10 | 45 | 2.34 ± 0.79 | 0.91 ± 0.42 | 1.63 ± 0.55 | 0.571 ± 0.165 |
| V11 | 47 | 2.58 ± 0.66 | 1.09 ± 0.41 | 1.84 ± 0.46 | 0.527 ± 0.163 |
| V12 | 57 | 2.22 ± 0.54 | 0.88 ± 0.29 | 1.55 ± 0.38 | 0.563 ± 0.118 |
| x1e-3 | x1e-3 | x1e-3 | |||
Data are reported as x̅ ± σ
Fig. 2Color coded vector images of the principle diffusion tensor direction and FA map. a Representative RG vector image illustrating the diffusion tensor directions as 2D ellipsoids. b Corresponding FA map with superimposed direction of the principle DTI vectors by red lines. c RGB vector image based on the 3D-DTI rs-EPI with 30 gradient directions representing diffusion tensor directions as 3D ellipsoids of a porcine aorta. d RG vector image based on the 2D-DTI rs-EPI with 18 gradient directions representing diffusion tensor directions as 2D ellipsoids of the same porcine aorta
Repeatability of mean FA measurements tested on four male volunteers
| Volunteer | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | R2 | R3 | R4 | |
| #1 | 0.525 | 0.551 | 0.592 | 0.535 |
| #2 | 0.562 | 0.585 | 0.604 | 0.540 |
| #3 | 0.563 | 0.614 | 0.607 | 0.566 |
| #4 | 0.597 | 0.617 | 0.628 | 0.602 |
| σ | 0.029 | 0.031 | 0.015 | 0.031 |
| x̅ | 0.562 | 0.592 | 0.608 | 0.561 |
| CV | 5.3 % | 5.2 % | 2.5 % | 5.4 % |
Mean diffusion components of the ex vivo high resolution 2D-DTI (top) and 3D-DTI (bottom) case
| 2D | ||||
| tangential (λ1) | radial (λ2) | MD | FA | |
| mm2/s | mm2/s | mm2/s | ||
| 1.10 ± 0.08 | 0.65 ± 0.10 | 0.88 ± 0.08 | 0.36 ± 0.07 | |
| x1e-3 | x1e-3 | x1e-3 | ||
| 3D | ||||
| tangential (λ1) | radial | longitudinal | MD | FA |
| mm2/s | mm2/s | mm2/s | mm2/s | |
| 1.07 ± 0.06 | 0.64 ± 0.10 | 0.62 ± 0.07 | 0.78 ± 0.06 | 0.32 ± 0.04 |
| x1e-3 | x1e-3 | x1e-3 | x1e-3 | |
Data are reported as x̅ ± σ
Fig. 3Vessel wall ADC map generated from six b-values images (0–1000 s/mm2). a B-value images along a certain gradient direction perpendicular to the slice direction (white headless arrow). b ADC map generated from the six b-value images illustrating a signal enhancement along and a signal drop perpendicular to the direction of the applied gradient direction. c Histogram distribution of ADC map indicating two populations of ADC values. d Result of signal simulation using equation S(b) = S 0 e − and found ADC populations (green line 2.11 and blue line 1.27e-3 mm2/s). Red vertical lines indicate the final set of selected b-values and black dashed vertical line the maximum difference of the found ADC pool
Fig. 4Linear regression analyses to compare FA, RD and λ1 vessel wall values with volunteer’s age. a Significant linear relationship (p-value = 0.00477) between mean FA and age; black solid line represents the fitted linear model (adjusted R2 = 0.52; linear equation: y = −0.0049x + 0.79). b Linear trend (p-value = 0.095) between mean RD and age; black solid line represents the fitted linear model (adjusted R2 = 0.18; linear equation: y = 1e-5x + 3.4e-4). c No linear relationship (p-value = 0.65) between the mean primary eigenvalues (λ1) and age was found; black solid line represents the fitted linear model (adjusted R2 = −0.08; linear equation: y = 1e-5x + 2e-3). In addition, calculated 95 % confidence (CI, red dashed line) and prediction intervals (PI, green dashed line) are plotted