Literature DB >> 27875691

Traffic noise drowns out great tit alarm calls.

Christopher N Templeton1, Sue Anne Zollinger2, Henrik Brumm2.   

Abstract

Anthropogenic noise is one of the fastest growing and most ubiquitous types of environmental pollution and can impair acoustic communication in a variety of animals [1]. Recent research has shown that birds can adjust acoustic parameters of their sexual signals (songs) in noisy environments [2,3], yet we know little about other types of vocalizations. Anti-predator signals contain subtle information that is critical for avoiding predation [4,5], and failure to detect these calls [6,7] as a result of anthropogenic noise pollution could have large fitness consequences by negatively impacting survival. We investigated whether traffic noise impacts both the production and perception of avian alarm calls using a combination of lab and field experiments with great tits (Parus major), a songbird that frequently inhabits noise-polluted environments. In response to experimental noise manipulation in controlled laboratory conditions, great tits increased the amplitude, but not the frequency parameters, of their mobbing alarm calls (hereafter 'alarm calls'). Playback experiments conducted in the wild indicate that current levels of road traffic noise mask alarm calls, impeding the ability of great tits to perceive these critical signals. These results show that, despite the vocal adjustments used to compensate for anthropogenic noise, great tits are not able to restore the active space of their calls in even moderately noisy environments. Consequently, birds are likely to suffer from increased predation risk under noise, with likely effects on their behaviour, populations, and community dynamics in noise-polluted areas.
Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27875691     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.09.058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  17 in total

1.  Social learning of acoustic anti-predator cues occurs between wild bird species.

Authors:  Sara C Keen; Ella F Cole; Michael J Sheehan; Ben C Sheldon
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  High-magnitude innovators as keystone individuals in the evolution of culture.

Authors:  Michal Arbilly
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Chronic anthropogenic noise disrupts glucocorticoid signaling and has multiple effects on fitness in an avian community.

Authors:  Nathan J Kleist; Robert P Guralnick; Alexander Cruz; Christopher A Lowry; Clinton D Francis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Higher songs of city birds may not be an individual response to noise.

Authors:  Sue Anne Zollinger; Peter J B Slater; Erwin Nemeth; Henrik Brumm
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Assessment of noise pollution and its effects on human health in industrial hub of Pakistan.

Authors:  Zia Ur Rahman Farooqi; Muhammad Sabir; Junaid Latif; Zubair Aslam; Hamaad Raza Ahmad; Iftikhar Ahmad; Muhammad Imran; Predrag Ilić
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Multi-modal communication: song sparrows increase signal redundancy in noise.

Authors:  Çağlar Akçay; Michael D Beecher
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  Traffic noise inhibits cognitive performance in a songbird.

Authors:  Alison Osbrink; Megan A Meatte; Alan Tran; Katri K Herranen; Lilliann Meek; May Murakami-Smith; Jacelyn Ito; Some Bhadra; Carrie Nunnenkamp; Christopher N Templeton
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Habitat-related differences in song structure and complexity in a songbird with a large repertoire.

Authors:  Krzysztof Deoniziak; Tomasz S Osiejuk
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 2.964

9.  Noisy anthropogenic infrastructure interferes with alarm responses in Savannah sparrows (Passerculus sandwichensis).

Authors:  Bridget Antze; Nicola Koper
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 2.963

10.  The Impact of Environmental Factors on the Efficacy of Chemical Communication in the Burying Beetle (Coleoptera: Silphidae).

Authors:  Johanna Chemnitz; Christian von Hoermann; Manfred Ayasse; Sandra Steiger
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 1.857

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.