Literature DB >> 27875655

Postoperative Pain Evaluation After Robotic Transaxillary Thyroidectomy Versus Conventional Thyroidectomy: A Prospective Study.

Lorenzo Fregoli1, Gabriele Materazzi1, Mario Miccoli2, Piermarco Papini1, Gianmarco Guarino1, Hurn-Sheng Wu3, Paolo Miccoli1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Robot-assisted transaxillary thyroidectomy (RATT) is an emerging technique with excellent cosmetic results but is supposedly more invasive and painful than conventional thyroidectomy (CT). This prospective study compared pain after RATT and CT.
METHODS: Inclusion criteria were a nodule <5 cm and volume <30 mL. Patients received the same analgesia. Pain was evaluated by visual analog scale (VAS) in the recovery room (VASrr), on the first postoperative day at 8:00 a.m. (VAS 8 a.m.) and 8:00 p.m. (VAS 8 p.m.), at 8:00 a.m. on the second postoperative day (VAS 8*a.m.), and after 7 days (VAS 7). Operative time and complications were evaluated.
RESULTS: From May 2015 to September 2015, 124 patients (all women) underwent thyroidectomy: 62 underwent RATT and 62 underwent CT. Mean age was 39.7 ± 10.2 years in the RATT group and 41.4 ± 12.5 years in the CT group. Groups were comparable for thyroid volume and nodule diameter. Operative time was longer in the RATT group than in the CT group (119.4 ± 25.5 versus 70.3 ± 11.0 minutes). Complications were three transient hypocalcemia in RATT and four in the CT group. No definitive complications occurred. VASrr was lower in the RATT group (1.79 ± 2.06 versus 2.5 ± 1.18; P < .0001). There was no difference between groups for VAS 8 a.m., VAS 8 p.m., and VAS 8*a.m., but VAS 7 was higher in the RATT group (0.85 ± 1.77 versus 0.17 ± 0.52; P < .010). DISCUSSION: RATT is as safe and effective as CT. Patients undergoing RATT, surprisingly, experienced less pain in the immediate postoperative period. However, the VAS 7 score was higher in the RATT group, probably because the intact neck is favorable in the early phase of recovery, but the large dissection takes longer for healing.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cervicotomy; pain; robot; thyroidectomy; transaxillary

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27875655     DOI: 10.1089/lap.2016.0461

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A        ISSN: 1092-6429            Impact factor:   1.878


  5 in total

1.  Robot-Assisted Transaxillary Thyroidectomy (RATT): A Series Appraisal of More than 250 Cases from Europe.

Authors:  Gabriele Materazzi; Lorenzo Fregoli; Piermarco Papini; Sohail Bakkar; Malince Chicas Vasquez; Paolo Miccoli
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Advances in Robotic Transaxillary Thyroidectomy in Europe.

Authors:  Micaela Piccoli; Barbara Mullineris; Daniele Santi; Davide Gozzo
Journal:  Curr Surg Rep       Date:  2017-06-26

3.  Drainage During Endoscopic Thyroidectomy.

Authors:  Gao-Xiang Chen; Cheng Li; Hai Zhang
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2019 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

4.  Postsurgical complications after robot-assisted transaxillary thyroidectomy: critical analysis of a large cohort of European patients.

Authors:  Leonardo Rossi; Valentina Buoni; Lorenzo Fregoli; Piermarco Papini; Andrea De Palma; Gabriele Materazzi
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2022-03-03

5.  Comparison of Postoperative Neck Pain and Discomfort, Swallowing Difficulty, and Voice Change After Conventional Open, Endoscopic, and Robotic Thyroidectomy: A Single-Center Cohort Study.

Authors:  Tae Kwun Ha; Dong Wook Kim; Ha Kyoung Park; Gi Won Shin; Young Jin Heo; Jin Wook Baek; Yoo Jin Lee; Hye Jung Choo; Do Hun Kim; Soo Jin Jung; Ji Sun Park; Sung Ho Moon; Ki Jung Ahn; Hye Jin Baek; Taewoo Kang
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 5.555

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.